SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨☐
Check the appropriate box:
| | | | | | |
¨
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | ☐ | ¨ | | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
x
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | | |
¨
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | | |
¨
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-11(c) or §240.14a-12 | | |
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
¨ | ☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 12a(6)(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
¨ | ☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
1301 “A” Street
Tacoma, Washington 98402
March 16, 2016
April 12, 2019
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to invite you to Columbia Banking System’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The meeting will be at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 27, 2016May 22, 2019 at the GreaterWilliam W. Philip Hall at the University of Washington Tacoma, Convention and Trade Center, 1500 Broadway,1918 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, Washington 98402.
At the meeting, you and the other shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on proposals with respect to (i) the election of eleven nominees for director to serve on our Board of Directors; (ii) the approval of an Amendment to our 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (iii) the approval, on an advisory basis (non-binding), of the compensation of our named executive officers; and (iii)(iv) the approval, on an advisory basis (non-binding), of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20162019 fiscal year.
You also will have the opportunity to hear ourColumbia’s management discuss the developments in our business and our industry in the past year and to ask questions. You will find additional information concerning Columbia Banking System and its operations, including its audited financial statements, in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, which is available on our website at www.columbiabank.com.
We hope that you can join us on April 27th.May 22nd . Whether or not you plan to attend, please take the time to vote via the Internet oronline, by telephone or by completing and mailing the proxy card (if you received one) as soon as possible.Your opinion and your vote are important to us. Voting by proxy will not prevent you from voting in person if you attend the meeting, but it will ensure that your vote is counted if you are unable to attend.
| | | | |
 | | |
 | |   |
William T. WeyerhaeuserCraig D. Eerkes | | | | Melanie J. DresselHadley S. Robbins |
| Chairman | | | | President and CEO& Chief Executive Officer |
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD APRIL 27, 2016MAY 22, 2019
| | | | |
| TIME | | 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 27, 2016May 22, 2019 |
| |
| PLACE | | The GreaterWilliam W. Philip Hall at University of Washington Tacoma Convention and Trade Center, 1500 Broadway,- 1918 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, Washington 98402 |
| |
| ITEMS OF BUSINESS | | The purposes of the meeting are as follows: |
| | |
| | (1) | | To elect the eleven nominees for director named in the attachedthis proxy statement to serve on the Board of Directors until the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors have been elected and have qualified. |
| | |
| | (2) | To approve an Amendment to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| (3) | To approve, on an advisory basis (non-binding), the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. |
| | |
| | (3) | (4) | To approve, on an advisory basis (non-binding), the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2019. |
| | |
| | (4) | (5) | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
| |
| RECORD DATE | | You are entitled to vote at the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereofof the meeting if you were a shareholder at the close of business on Monday, March 7, 2016.25, 2019. |
| |
| VOTING BY PROXY | | Please vote via the Internetonline or by telephone or submit your proxy card (if you received one), as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the annual meeting in accordance with your instructions. For specific instructions on voting, please refer to the instructions in the proxy statement and on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail or, if you received a hard copy of the proxy materials, on the enclosed proxy card. |
|
| By Order of the Board of Directors |
| | |
 | |  |
| | |
| | Kumi Y. Baruffi |
| | Corporate Secretary |
The proxy statement was first made available or mailed to shareholders on March 16, 2016.April 12, 2019.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
ii
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
1301 “A” Street
Tacoma, Washington 98402-4200
(253) 305-1900
PROXY STATEMENT
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 20162019 Shareholder Meeting:
This proxy statement, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) and our annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20152018 (the “2015“2018 Annual Report”) are available atwww.columbiabank.com.
The Columbia Board of Directors (the “Board”) is soliciting proxies for this year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the meeting. Please read it carefully.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
The meeting will be at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 27, 2016May 22, 2019 at the Greater Tacoma Convention and Trade Center, 1500 Broadway,William W. Philip Hall, University of Washington, 1918 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, Washington 98402.
The Board set March 7, 201625, 2019 as the record date for the meeting (the “Record Date”). Shareholders who owned Columbia common stock at the close of business on that date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, with each share entitled to one vote for each matter to be voted on at the meeting. There were 57,989,09673,469,797 shares of Columbia common stock outstanding on the Record Date.
In this proxy statement, the terms the “Company,” “Columbia,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Columbia Banking System, Inc.
Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders on the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies of the materials (including the 20152018 Annual Report) to each shareholder. As a result, unless you previously elected to receive paper copies or request them this year, you will not receive paper copies of these proxy materials. We are sending to our shareholders (other than those that previously elected to receive paper copies) a copy of the Notice, which will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials over the Internet. The Notice will also instruct you as to how you may access your proxy card to vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, free of charge, please follow the instructions included in the Notice.
The Notice was mailed to shareholders on March 16, 2016.April 12, 2019.
COMPANY PHILOSOPHY
Our goal is to be thea leading Pacific Northwest regional community bank, with a significant presence in selected markets, and to consistently increase earnings per share and shareholder value. Management believes that there continues to be opportunity for organic growth based upon branch footprint and the organization’s commitment to delivering exceptional customer satisfaction and qualityquality` products, and growth through selective acquisitions. Our business strategy is to provide our customers with the financial sophistication and breadth of products of a regional banking company while retaining the appeal and service level of a community bank. We continually evaluate our existing business processes while focusing on maintaining asset quality and balanced loan and deposit portfolios, building our strong core deposit base, expanding total revenue and controlling expenses in an effort to increase our return on average equity and gain operational efficiencies. We believe that, as a result of our strong commitment to highly personalized, relationship-oriented customer service, our varied products, our strategic branch locations and the long-standing community presence of our managers, banking officers and branch personnel, we are well positioned to attract and retain new customers and to increase our market share of loans, deposits, and other financial services in the communities we serve. We are committed to increasing market share in the communities we serve by continuing to leverage our existing branch network strategically adding new branch locations and considering business combinations that are consistent with our expansion strategy. We believe that achievement of these goals will create long-term value for our shareholders, consistent with protecting the interests of depositors.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of paper copies of the proxy materials?
In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to all shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, we are furnishing the proxy materials to our shareholders over the Internet. If you received the Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials. Instead, the Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials and submit your vote via the Internet. If you received the Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice for requesting such materials.
We mailed the Notice on March 16, 2016,April 12, 2019 to all shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the date of mailing of the Notice, all shareholders and beneficial owners have the ability to access all of our proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice. These proxy materials are available free of charge.
What is being voted on at the Annual Meeting?
At the Annual Meeting you will be asked to vote on:
the election of eleven nominees to serve on the Board until the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors have been elected and have qualified;
the approval of an Amendment to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan;
the approval, on an advisory basis (non-binding), of the compensation of Columbia’s named executive officers; and
the approval, on an advisory basis (non-binding), of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.
2019.
Who is entitled to vote?
Only shareholders who owned Columbia common stock, either directly or beneficially, as of the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote the shares that they held on that date at the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting.
How do I vote?
At the Meeting. Shares held in your name as the shareholder of record may be voted by you in person at the Annual Meeting. Shares held beneficially in “street name” may be voted by you in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker or other agent that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares, and you bring the legal proxy to the Annual Meeting.
By Mail. Shareholders who ask for and receive a paper proxy card may vote by mail and should complete, sign and date their proxy card and mail it in the pre-addressed envelope that will accompany the delivery of the paper proxy card. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the time of the meeting in order for your shares to be voted.
By Internet. For shares registered in your name, you may go tohttp://www.proxyvote.com to transmit a proxy to vote your shares by means of the Internet. You will be required to provide our number and the control number, both of which are contained on the Notice or the proxy card, as applicable. You will then be asked to complete an electronic proxy card. The votes represented by such proxy will be generated on the computer screen, and you will be prompted to submit or revise them as desired. We must receive votes submitted via the Internet by 11:59 p.m. ET on April 26, 2016.
May 21, 2019.By Telephone.You may grant a proxy to vote your shares by telephone. The telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to grant a proxy to vote your shares, and to confirm that your instructions have been recorded properly. To vote by telephone, call1-800-690-6903by 11:59 p.m. ET on April 26, 2016.May 21, 2019. Please see the instructions on the Notice or the proxy card, as applicable.
For shares registered in the name of a broker or bank.Most beneficial owners, whose stock is held in “street name,” receive instructions for granting proxies from their banks, brokers or other agents, rather than a proxy card. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and as the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker on how to vote.
A number of brokers and banks are participating in a program provided through Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. that offers the means to grant proxies to vote shares over the telephone and Internet. If your shares are held in an account with a broker or bank participating in the Broadridge program, you may grant a proxy to vote those shares by calling the telephone number or visiting the website shown on the instruction form received from your broker or bank.
Can I revoke my proxy and/or change my vote?
Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised by filing with Columbia’s Secretary a notice of revocation, voting again by Internet or telephone (only your last Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the meeting will be counted), signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date, obtaining a legal proxy from the broker or other agent that holds your shares, or attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. The powers of the proxy holders will be suspended if you attend the Annual Meeting in person and so request, although attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy.
What are the Board’s recommendations?
The Board recommends a vote (i) FOR the election of the director nominees listed in this proxy statement, (ii) FOR the approval of the Amendment to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, (iii) FORthe approval, on an advisory basis (non-binding), of the compensation of Columbia’s named executive officers, and (iv) FORthe approval, on an advisory basis (non-binding), of Deloitte as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2016.2019.
If you indicate when voting by Internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board, or if you sign and return a proxy card without specific instructions as to how to vote, William T. WeyerhaeuserCraig D. Eerkes and Melanie J. Dressel,Hadley S. Robbins, as the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card, will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors. If any other matters are considered at the meeting, Mr. WeyerhaeuserEerkes and Ms. DresselMr. Robbins will vote as recommended by the Board. If the Board does not give a recommendation, Mr. WeyerhaeuserEerkes and Ms. DresselMr. Robbins will have discretion to vote as they think best.
Will my shares be voted if I do not vote by using the Internet, by telephone or by signing and returning my proxy card?
If your shares are registered in your name and you do not vote by using the Internet, by telephone or by returning a signed proxy card or do not vote in person at the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted.
If your shares are held in “street name” and you do not submit voting instructions to your broker,your broker may vote your shares at this meeting on the advisory (non-binding) approval of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm onlyonl.y. If no instructions are given with respect to the election of directors, orthe approval, on an advisory basis (non-binding), of the compensation of Columbia’s named executive officers or the selection on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the frequency for holding future advisory shareholder votes to approve executive compensation, your broker cannot vote your shares on these proposals.
How many votes are needed to hold the Annual Meeting?
A majority of Columbia’s outstanding shares as of the Record Date (a quorum) must be present at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. Shares are counted as present at the meeting if a shareholder is present and votes in person at the meeting or has properly submitted a proxy card. As of the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, 57,989,09673,469,797 shares of Columbia common stock were
outstanding and eligible to vote. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. Broker non-votes, however, are not counted as shares present and entitled to be voted with respect to a matter on which the broker has expressly not voted. Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because (i) the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (ii) the broker lacks discretionary voting power to vote such shares.
What vote is required to elect directors?
In an uncontested election, a nominee for election to a position on the Board will be elected as a director if the votes castFor the nominee exceed the votes castAgainst the nominee (known as majority voting). The term of any director who does not receive a majority of votes cast in an election held under that standard terminates on the earliest to occur of: (i) 90 days after the date election results are certified; (ii) the date the director resigns; and (iii) the date the Board fills the position. Our Bylaws provide that an election is considered “contested,” and will be held under a plurality standard, if there are shareholder nominees for director pursuant to the advance notice provision in Section 1.17 of our Bylaws who are not withdrawn by the advance notice deadline set forth in that section. You may voteFor, Against, orAbstainfrom voting for the listed nominees. The following will not be votes cast and will have no effect on the election of any director nominee: (i) a share whose ballot is marked as abstain; (ii) a share otherwise present at the meeting but for which there is an abstention; and (iii) a share otherwise present at the meeting as to which a shareholder gives no authority or direction. Shareholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of directors.
What vote is required to approve the Amendment to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan?
To approve the Amendment to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, we must receive the affirmative vote For the proposal by holders of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal. You may vote For, Against or Abstain from approving the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.
What vote is required to approve the advisory (non-binding) resolution on the compensation of Columbia’s executive officers?
The affirmative voteForby a majority of those shares present in person or by proxy and voting on this matter is required on the advisory (non-binding) resolution on the compensation of Columbia’s named executive officers. You may voteFor, Against orAbstainfrom approving the advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve named executive officer compensation. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.
What vote is required to approve the advisory (non-binding) proposal on the appointment of the independent registered public accountants?
The proposal to approve, on an advisory basis (non-binding), the appointment of Deloitte as Columbia’s independent registered public accounting firm will be adopted if a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy and voting on this matter are castForthe proposal. You may voteFor Against, Against orAbstainfrom approving the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.
Can I vote on other matters?
We have not received timely notice of any shareholder proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting, and the Board does not know of any other matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting.
Who is soliciting my proxy and who is paying the cost of solicitation?
The Board is soliciting proxies for use at the 20162019 Annual Meeting. Certain directors, officers and employees of Columbia and its banking subsidiary, Columbia State Bank, or its trust company subsidiary, Columbia Trust Company, may solicit proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile, or in person.
We will pay for the costs of solicitation. We do not expect to pay any compensation for the solicitation of proxies, except to brokers, nominees and similar record holders for reasonable expenses in mailing proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock. However, management may, if it determines it necessary to obtain the requisite shareholder vote, retain the services of a proxy solicitation firm.
How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. We will publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. After the Form 8-K is filed, you may obtain a copy by visiting our website at www.columbiabank.com, the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, or by writing to: Columbia Banking System, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 1301 “A” Street, Tacoma, Washington, 98402-4200.
When are proposals and director nominations for the 20172020 Annual Meeting due?
Proposals by shareholders to transact business at Columbia’s 20172020 Annual Meeting must be delivered to Columbia’s Secretary no later than December 28, 2016January 23, 2020 in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card and should contain such information as is required under our Bylaws. Such proposals will also need to comply with the SEC’s regulations regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in Columbia-sponsored proxy materials. In order for a shareholder proposal to be raised from the floor during next year’s annual meeting, or for a shareholder to nominate a person or persons for a director, written notice must be received by us no earlier than the 150th150th day and no later than the 120th120th day prior to the first anniversary of the 20162019 Annual Meeting (meaning no earlier than November 28, 2016,December 24, 2019, and no later than December 28, 2016)January 23, 2020), and should contain such information as required under our Bylaws. However, if the date of the 20172020 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the anniversary of the 20162019 Annual Meeting, notice must be delivered no earlier than the 150th150th day and no later than the 120th120th day prior to the date of the 20172020 Annual Meeting or, if the first public announcement of the 20172020 Annual Meeting date is less than 100 days before the meeting date, notice must be delivered no later than the 10th10th day following the date of the Company’s first public announcement of the 20172020 Annual Meeting date.
To be in proper form, a shareholder’s notice must include the specified information concerning the proposal or director nominee as described in our Bylaws. The Company will not consider any proposal or nomination that is not timely or otherwise does not meet the Bylaw and SEC requirements for submitting a proposal or nomination.
Notice of intention to present proposals at the 20172020 Annual Meeting, or to obtain a copy of the detailed procedures regarding notice requirements for proposals or director nominations, should be directed to Columbia’s Corporate Secretary, 1301 “A” Street, Tacoma, Washington 98402.
STOCK OWNERSHIP
Beneficial Owners of More Than Five Percent
As of January 31, 2016March 15, 2019 (except as otherwise noted), the shareholders identified in the table below beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Columbia common stock.shares. To the Company’s knowledge, based on the public filings which beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Columbia common stockshares are required to make with the SEC, there are no other beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Columbia common stockshares as of January 31, 2016,March 15, 2019, other than those set forth below. The percentage ownership data is based on 73,467,373 Columbia common shares outstanding as of March 15, 2019.
| | | | | | | | |
Name and Address | | Number of Shares (1) | | | Percentage | |
| | |
Blackrock, Inc. (2) 55 East 52ndStreet New York, NY 10055 | | | 5,397,231 | | | | 9.35 | % |
| | |
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (3) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | | | 4,289,438 | | | | 7.43 | % |
| | |
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) 225 Liberty Street New York, NY 10286 | | | 3,002,471 | | | | 5.20 | % |
| Name and Address | | | Number of Shares (1) | | | Percentage | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Blackrock, Inc. (2) | | | 10,189,781 | | | | 13.87 | % |
| 55 East 52nd Street | | | | | | | | |
| New York, NY 10055 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. (3) | | | 7,687,182 | | | | 10.46 | % |
| 100 Vanguard Blvd. | | | | | | | | |
| Malvern, PA 19355 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| T Rowe Price (4) | | | 4,335,517 | | | | 5.9 | % |
| 100 East Pratt St. | | | | | | | | |
| Baltimore, MD 21202 | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Pursuant to rules promulgated by the SEC, a person or entity is considered to beneficially own shares of common stock if the person or entity has or shares (i) voting power, meaning the power to vote or direct the voting of the shares, or (ii) investment power, meaning the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of the shares. |
| (2) | An amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 201624, 2019 indicates that BlackRock, Inc. had sole voting power over 5,255,53810,010,726 shares and sole dispositive power over 5,397,23110,189,781 shares. Various persons had the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the Columbia common stock of the Company.shares. No one person’s interest in the Columbia common stockshares was more than five percent of the total outstanding Columbia common stock of the Company.shares. |
| (3) | An amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 20162019 indicates that The Vanguard Group, Inc. had sole voting power over 73,10671,451 shares, shared voting power over 3,3008,238 shares, sole dispositive power over 4,216,4927,613,872 shares and shared dispositive power over 72,94673,310 shares. |
| (4) | A Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2016February 14, 2019 indicates that The Bank of New York Mellon CorporationT. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. had sole voting power over 2,851,8241,105,160 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,486,990 shares and shared dispositive power over 493,3074,335,517 shares. |
Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows, as of January 31, 2016,March 15, 2019, the amount of Columbia common stock directly owned (unless otherwise indicated) by (a) each director and director nominee; (b) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below; and (c) all of our directors and executive officers (including those not named in the Summary Compensation Table) as a group. Except as otherwise noted, we believe that the beneficial owners of the shares listed below, based on information furnished by such owners, have or share with a spouse voting andand/or investment power with respect to the shares. Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and includes shares that could be acquired within 60 days through the exercise of an option or other right.SEC.
| Name | | Position | | Number (1) | | Percentage | | | Position | | Number | | | Percentage | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
William T. Weyerhaeuser | | Chairman of the Board | | | 247,746 | (2) | | | * | | |
Melanie J. Dressel | | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | | | 142,965 | (3) | | | * | | |
| Craig D. Eerkes | | | Chairman of the Board | | | 10,322 | (1) | | | * | |
| Hadley S. Robbins | | | Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer | | | 64,964 | (2) | | | * | |
| Kumi Y. Baruffi | | | Executive Vice President, General Counsel | | | 20,148 | (3) | | | * | |
David A. Dietzler | | Director | | | 6,612 | | | | | Director | | | 12,303 | (1) | | | * | |
Craig D. Eerkes | | Director | | | 4,631 | | | | * | | |
Ford Elsaesser | | Director | | | 35,573 | | | | * | | | Director | | | 41,264 | (1) | | | * | |
Mark A. Finkelstein | | Director | | | 2,000 | | | | * | | | Director | | | 7,691 | (1) | | | * | |
John P. Folsom | | Director | | | 42,638 | (4) | | | * | | | Director | | | 48,329 | (4) | | | * | |
| Eric S. Forrest | | | Director | | | 7,463 | (5) | | | * | |
Thomas M. Hulbert | | Director | | | 42,015 | | | | * | | | Director | | | 47,706 | (1) | | | * | |
Michelle M. Lantow | | Director | | | 9,500 | | | | * | | | Director | | | 15,191 | (1) | | | * | |
David C. Lawson | | Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer | | | 6,653 | | | | * | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer | | | 20,856 | (6) | | | * | |
| Randal L. Lund | | | Director | | | 3,524 | (1) | | | * | |
Andrew L. McDonald | | Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer | | | 29,438 | | | | * | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer | | | 43,683 | (7) | | | * | |
S. Mae Fujita Numata | | Director | | | 8,825 | (5) | | | * | | | Director | | | 14,516 | (8) | | | * | |
Hadley J. Robbins | | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | | | 12,682 | (6) | | | * | | |
Elizabeth W. Seaton | | Director | | | 4,000 | | | | * | | | Director | | | 9,691 | (1) | | | * | |
| Gregory A. Sigrist | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | | 5,910 | (9) | | | * | |
Clint E. Stein | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | | 15,245 | | | | * | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | | | 35,728 | (10) | | | * | |
| | | | | | | | |
Directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons) | | | | | 615,166 | | | | 1.07 | % | |
| Janine T. Terrano | | | Director | | | 2,525 | (1) | | | * | |
| William T. Weyerhaeuser | | | Director | | | 253,437 | (11) | | | * | |
| Directors and executive officers as a group (20) | | | | | | 677,924 | | | | 0.92 | % |
| * | Represents less than 1% of outstanding common stock. |
| (1) | Includes 1,691 unvested time-based restricted shares for which the director has voting but not investment power. |
(1) | There(2) | Includes 4,183 vested performance shares, which were nocalculated and approved by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors in February 2019, 20,413 unvested time-based restricted shares and 28,940 unvested performance-based restricted shares, the maximum amount of Columbia common stockperformance-based shares that Mr. Robbins is eligible to receive, which are subject to options or other rights exercisable within 60 days.final calculation and approval by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors. Mr. Robbins has voting but not investment power for his unvested restricted shares. |
(2) | 223,249(3) | Includes 2,627 vested performance shares, which were calculated and approved by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors in February 2019, 5,172 unvested time-based restricted shares, and 5,400 unvested performance-based restricted shares, the maximum amount of performance-based shares that Ms. Baruffi is eligible to receive, which are held indirectlysubject to final calculation and approval by WBW Trust Number One,the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors. Ms. Baruffi has voting but not investment power for her unvested restricted shares. |
| (4) | Includes 1,691 unvested time-based restricted shares for which Mr. Weyerhaeuser is the trustee with soleFolsom has voting andbut not investment power. |
(3) | Includes 51,134 shares held in Ms. Dressel’s Family LLC, 2,408 shares held by a corporation owned by Ms. Dressel and her spouse, and 9,136 shares held in Ms. Dressel’s 401(k). |
(4) | Includespower, 10,600 shares held indirectly in Mr. Folsom’s IRA, 950 shares held in Mrs. Folsom’s IRA and 23,088 shares held in a joint account with his wife. |
| (5) | Includes 1,691 unvested time-based restricted shares for which Mr. Forrest has voting but not investment power and 933 shares held in a joint account with his wife. |
| (6) | Includes 2,844 vested performance shares, which were calculated and approved by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors in February 2019, 5,436 unvested time-based restricted shares, and 5,610 unvested performance-based restricted shares, the maximum amount of performance-based shares that Mr. Lawson is eligible to receive, which are subject to final calculation and approval by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors. Mr. Lawson has voting but not investment power for his unvested restricted shares. |
| (7) | Includes 3,329 vested performance shares, which were calculated and approved by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors in February 2019, 6,358 unvested time-based restricted shares, and 6,545 unvested performance-based restricted shares, the maximum amount of performance-based shares that Mr. McDonald is eligible to receive, which are subject to final calculation and approval by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors. Mr. McDonald has voting but not investment power for his unvested restricted shares. |
| (8) | Includes 1,691 unvested time-based restricted shares for which Ms. Numata has voting but not investment power, and 825 shares held jointly with spouse. |
(6) | (9) | Includes 4,7312,370 unvested time-based restricted shares, issuable uponand 3,540 unvested performance-based restricted shares, the exercisemaximum amount of currently exercisable stock options.performance-based shares that Mr. Sigrist is eligible to receive, which are subject to final calculation and approval by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors. Mr. Sigrist has voting but not investment power for his unvested restricted shares. |
| (10) | Includes 3,915 vested performance shares, which were calculated and approved by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors in February 2019, 18,190 unvested time-based restricted shares, and 8,775 unvested performance-based restricted shares, the maximum amount of performance-based shares that Mr. Stein is eligible to receive, which are subject to final calculation and approval by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Columbia board of directors. Mr. Stein has voting but not investment power for his unvested restricted shares. |
| (11) | Includes 1,691 unvested time-based restricted shares for which Mr. Weyerhaeuser has voting but not investment power, and 223,249 shares that are held indirectly by WBW Trust Number One, for which Mr. Weyerhaeuser is the trustee with sole voting and investment power. |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE DIRECTORS AND NOMINEES
Size of the BoardBoard
Our Bylaws provide that the number of directors to be elected by the shareholders will be at least five and not more than 17. Under the Bylaws, the Board has authority to decide the exact number of directors to be elected within these limits. The Board has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting at eleven and has nominated the persons listed on the following pages, each of whom has consented to serve as a director if elected, for election as directors to serve until the 20172020 Annual Meeting or until their successors are elected.
Director Retirement Age
Our Bylaws provide that any person who has or will attain the age of 75 prior to a meeting of shareholders may not stand for election at such meeting. As a result, Mr. Dietzler, Mr. Folsom, and Mr. Weyerhaeuser, who have served as directors since, respectively, 2013, 1997 and 1998, have not been nominated for election at the Annual Meeting.
Replacement NomineeReplacement Nomineess
If a nominee refuses or is unable to stand for election, the Board may reduce the number of seats on the Board or designate a replacement nominee. If the Board designates a substitute, shares represented by proxy will be votedFOR the substitute nominee. The Board presently has no knowledge that any of the nominees will refuse or be unable to serve.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Information regarding each of the nominees is provided below, including each nominee’s name, age as of the Record Date, principal occupation and public company directorships during the past five years, and the year first elected or appointed a director of Columbia, its predecessor corporation or one of its former or current subsidiaries. All of the nominees are presently directors of Columbia and Columbia Bank. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers, nor are any of the corporations or organizations referenced in the biographical information below a parent, subsidiary or affiliate of Columbia.
| | | | |
  | | David A. Dietzler | Craig D. Eerkes | Director since 20132014 |
| | |
| | Mr. Dietzler, 72, served as a director of West Coast Bancorp prior to the acquisition of West Coast Bancorp by Columbia. Mr. Dietzler was managing partner of KPMG LLP’s office in Portland, Oregon before retiring in 2005 after 37 years of service. He earned his MSBA from the University of North Dakota. Mr. Dietzler has extensive experience auditing public companies and working with audit committees, and gained significant expertise in SEC reporting, financial statement preparation, internal control and compliance requirements. Mr. Dietzler has been a director of Portland General Electric Company since 2006 serving as Chair of the Audit Committee until May 2015 and remains a member of the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Dietzler’s expertise in compliance matters as well his experience serving on multiple audit committees make him a valuable resource to the Board. Mr. Dietzler is considered one of the Board’s designated audit committee financial experts.
|
| | |
 | | Melanie J. Dressel | | Director since 1998 |
| Ms. Dressel, 63, was named Chief Executive Officer of Columbia in February 2003, continues to serve as the Company’s President, and has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Columbia Bank since January 2000. She has served in several capacities at Columbia, including President and Chief Operating Officer from 2000 to 2003; Executive Vice President of retail banking from 1997 to 2000; and upon joining Columbia in 1993, served as Senior Vice President and Private Banking Manager until 1997. Ms. Dressel has approximately 40 years of banking experience and prior to joining Columbia, directed the private banking division of Puget Sound National Bank, and between 1974 and 1988, held various positions with Bank of California.
She is a graduate of the University of Washington with a degree in Political Science. She is a member on the Boards of Puget Sound Energy (Chair), Executive Council for a Greater Tacoma (past Chair), Washington Bankers Association (past Chair) and the Washington Roundtable. She also serves on the American Bankers Council, the ABA Grassroots Committee and the Bellarmine Benefactors’ Trust.
She is a past member of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco’s Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council (CDIAC), and she served as a Board member of The American Bankers Association. She further served as Chair of the Boards of Mary Bridge Children’s Foundation, Bellarmine Preparatory School and Tacoma/Pierce County Chamber of Commerce.
Melanie Dressel was honored as 2011 Community Banker of the Year byAmerican Banker Magazine,and was also named in 2014 for the sixth time by the magazine as one of The 25 Most Powerful Women in Banking.Ms. Dressel was awarded CEO of the Year bySeattle Business Magazine’sinaugural Executive Excellence Awards in January 2013.
As Chief Executive Officer and a director, Ms. Dressel serves as the primary liaison between the Board and management and as the executive with overall responsibility for executing the Company’s strategic plan.
|
| | | | |
| | Craig D. Eerkes | | Director since 2014 |
| Mr. Eerkes, 63,67, has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Sun Pacific Energy, Inc., a Tri-Cities based retail and wholesale petroleum company with locations throughout Washington since 1981. He has an extensive background with financial institutions and broad experience in highly regulated industries, including fifteensixteen years as a director of WMI Insurance Company, a health and life insurance company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. He was the chairman and a director of AmericanWest Bancorp from 2004 to 2012, as well as a director orof First Hawaiian Bank from 1996 to 1999. He was founder, director and chairman of American National Bank, N.A., Kennewick, Washington, from 1981 to 1996. Mr. Eerkes is a graduate of the University of Puget Sound. He was named “Tri-Citian of the Year” for 2014 and is actively involved in the Boy Scouts, Boys & Girls Clubs, United Way and several other community organizations. His expertise in community banking and risk management brings strong operational depth to the Board. Mr. Eerkes was named as Chairman of the Board of Columbia in May 2018. |
| | |
 | | |
 | | Ford Elsaesser | | Director since 2014 |
| | |
| | Mr. Elsaesser, 64,67, was a member of the Intermountain Community Bancorp board of directors from 1997 until its acquisition by Columbia in 2014, serving as its Chairman from May 2013. An attorney with extensive experience with financial service companies, Mr. Elsaesser is a senior partner at Elsaesser Jarzabek Anderson Elliott & Macdonald,Chtd, a Sandpoint, Idaho-based law firm founded in 1979. His practice focuses on commercial law and banking, civil litigation, bankruptcy and trusteeships and receiverships. He has served as Adjunct Professor at St. John’s University School of Law since 2003, and on the Advisory Board of the University’s Bankruptcy Program since 1999. He has also served as an Adjunct Professor at the University of Idaho Law School since 2005. A graduate of Goddard College and the University of Idaho Law School, Mr. Elsaesser is active in his community and has served as Chairman of the Lake Pend Oreille Commission since 2003.2003 and Chairman of Bonner General Health Hospital since 2006. He is also a director of Food for Our Children, Bonner General Health Hospital, and the American Bankruptcy Institute. His knowledge of and contacts within the local Idaho market, as well as his legal experience, make him a valuable resource to the Board. |
| | |
 | | |
 | | Mark A. Finkelstein | | Director since 2014 |
| | |
| | Mr. Finkelstein, 57,60, has extensive legal background and experience with financial services companies and public companies generally. He served since September 2014 as the Chief Legal and Administrative Officer atand Secretary of Blucora, Inc., where he oversees the company’s legal, compliance and human resources departments and advises on legal and corporate strategy matters. From December 2011 from September 2014 through July 2014,June of 2017. Prior to joining Blucora, he served as Executive Vice President –- Corporate Development and General Counsel of Emeritus Corporation an NYSE-listed healthcare company with over 30,000 employees,from December 2011 through July 2014, and as thethat company’s Corporate Secretary of Emeritus from May 2012 through July 2014. Prior toBefore joining Emeritus, Mr. Finkelsteinhe served as a strategy advisor for private investment management firms in the United States and Europe and as the chief executive officer and a member of the board of directors of Novellus Capital Management, a specialized asset management firm. From 1986 to 2006, he practiced law with the Seattle law firm of Graham & Dunn, P.C., where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions, complex financing strategies and other corporate transactions involving financial serviceinstitutions and other companies. A resident of Seattle, Washington, Mr. Finkelstein received hisearned a B.A. in Economics with High Honors in Economics from Thethe University of Michigan, and his J.D.holds a law degree from Thethe University of Michigan Law School. He is a member of the Audit and Corporate Responsibility Committee of the Board of Trustees for Seattle Children’s Hospital. Mr. Finkelstein’s legal, strategic management and financial expertise make him a valuable resource to the Board. |
| | | | |
| | |
 | | John P. Folsom | Eric S. Forrest | Director since 19972017 |
| | |
| | Mr. Folsom, 72,Forrest, 51, served as President of Brown & Brown, Inc. of Washington, formerly Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell (insurance brokers and consulting), Tacoma, Washington, from 1990 through December 31, 2006. Mr. Folsom received his professional designation in underwriting and risk management and currently serves as an independent consultant on insurance and risk management matters. Mr. Folsom earned his B.S. degree from the University of Washington and his J.D. from the University of California. He was also a past member of the California and American Bar Association. Mr. Folsom is a resident of Pierce County, and has served many community organizations, including as Director of the Foundation for Tacoma Students, Vice President and Director of the Children’s Museum of Tacoma, Emeritus Director of the Tacoma Art Museum and Director of MultiCare Health System. He also currently serves as a director of Pacific Continental Corporation prior to its acquisition by Columbia. He is co-President of Eugene-based beverage distributor, Bigfoot Beverages, overseeing the company’s Pepsi franchises throughout Oregon and managing its day-to-day operations, warehousing and fleet. Mr. Forrest has served on the Board of Directors of Eugene School District 4J, chaired the Eugene Chamber of Commerce executive committee and served on the City of Eugene’s budget committee. He currently chairs the Oregon Beverage Recycling Board, which he also co-founded, and serves on the boards of directors of the Pepsi-Cola Bottlers Association and the Ford Family Foundation. He received an M.B.A. from Willamette University of Washington – Tacoma Urban Studies Advisory Board and The Children’s Museum.a B.A. from Oregon State University. Mr. Folsom’s knowledge of,Forrest’s strong ties within the Eugene market, as well as his deep management experience and business and personal contacts in the local market, together with his expertise in risk management matters and legal background,entrepreneurial drive, make him a valuable resource to the Board. |
| | |
 | | |
 | | Thomas M. Hulbert | | Director since 1999 |
| |
| | Mr. Hulbert, 69,72, has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Hulco, Inc., Olympia, Washington, a family-heldfamily- held real estate holding and investment company focusing on the acquisition, management and sale of properties within Washington state since 1979. He was also President and Chief Executive Officer of Winsor Corporation, a Seattle-based research and development company specializing in lighting technologies from 1996 to 2013. Mr. Hulbert’s business experience also includes serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of a manufacturing company and supervising the operations of a timber contracting and logging company in Montana and Washington. He has served on numerous boards of local private companies, and his board and leadership experience, andcoupled with his knowledge of real estate investment providesand mergers and acquisitions, provide a valuable resource to the Board. |
| | |
 | | |
 | | Michelle M. Lantow | | Director since 2012 |
| |
| | Ms. Lantow, 54, was appointed the57, served as Chief Administrative Officer at New Season’s Market, LLC infrom July 2012 to September 2016, where she iswas responsible for all financial reporting, accounting, cash management, information technology and strategic planning. From 2010, she served as the Chief Financial Officer of McCormick & Schmick’s, a locally owned restaurant company established in 1970 and owning over 80 restaurants until the company was sold in 2012. As the Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Lantow was responsible for all financial reporting associated with a public company, in addition to human resources and information technology functions. Prior to that time, Ms. Lantow worked at lucy activewear, Inc., an apparel company that designs and sells fashion-forward performance apparel for athletic women, serving as the President from 2007 to 2009 and the Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2007. During the period 1995 to 2000, Ms. Lantow served as the Corporate Controller and Vice President of Investor Relations with The Gap, Inc., a diversified international specialty retailer. Ms. Lantow holds a BA in Business Economics from the University of California. She is active in her community and is Treasurer and Trustee of the chairpersonMultnomah County Library Foundation. She also serves as a member of Portland State University’s MBA program.the advisory boards of the Women’s Venture Fund and Grand Central Bakery. Ms. Lantow’s depth of public company, strategic management and leadership experience make her a valuable resource for the Board. She is one of the Board’s designated audit committee financial experts. |
| | | | |
| | |
| | S. Mae Fujita Numata |
 | | Randal L. Lund | Director since 20122017 |
| |
| | Mr. Lund, 61, served as a partner for 37 years with the accounting firm KPMG and has extensive accounting and operational experience with public companies. He is a retired Certified Public Accountant in Oregon and a retired member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. In his role as partner at KPMG, Mr. Lund was responsible for the audits of financial statements for a wide variety of companies, holding frequent meetings with audit committees and Securities and Exchange Commission regulators and reviewing and assessing company internal controls and corporate governance functions. He also worked for two years in the National Office of KPMG in New York City. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Montana State University and has served on the boards of directors of the Software Association of Oregon, Metropolitan Family Services and Business for Culture and the Arts. Mr. Lund’s deep expertise in the auditing and governance of public companies make him a valuable resource to the Board. He is one of the Board’s designated audit committee financial experts. |
 | | S. Mae Fujita Numata | Director since 2012 |
| |
| Ms. Numata, 59,62, is the founder of Numata Consulting PLLC for whichPLLC. Through this consulting business, she has served asprovided interim executive leadership services to privately-owned companies in Washington, Oregon and Montana. Ms. Numata is a Family Office Manager in Montana since 2015 and has served as the Chief Operating Officer andformer partner with a national consulting firm, a former Chief Financial Officer in the media industry for MMGL Corp. (f/k/11 years, and a Schnitzer Investment Corp.), a privately held investment firm since 2010. She was formerly an Engagement Partner with Tatum, a national CFO consulting firm. From 2006 to 2008,former banker for 24 years. Ms. Numata served as the Senior Vice President/is a board member, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate SecretaryTreasurer of Fisher Communications,OSCCorp Inc., formerly known as Oberto Brands, and is a broadcasting company. From 1997 to 2006, Ms. Numata served as Vice Presidentboard member and Chief Financial OfficerAudit Committee Chair of The Seattle Times Company, and between 1993 – 1997 was a Senior Vice President of Corporate Development of KeyBank of Washington. Ms. NumataGeoEngineers, Inc. She is a member of the Washington Society of and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Women Corporate Directors and National Association of Corporate Directors. Among other activities, sheShe graduated from the University of Washington and holds a B.A. in Business Administration with a concentration in accounting. She is the co-presidentalso a graduate of the board for the Executive Development Institute and a board member, 2nd vice president and investment committee chair for the Girl Scouts of Western Washington.Institute. Ms. Numata’s extensive accounting and banking background provide the Board and Audit Committee with valuable expertise, and she is one of the Board’s designated audit committee financial experts. |
| | |
 | | Elizabeth W. Seaton |
 | | Hadley S. Robbins | Director since 20142017 |
| |
| | Mr. Robbins, 62, was named President and Chief Executive Officer of Columbia and Columbia Bank effective July 1, 2017. He was appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer of Columbia and Columbia Bank in February 2017, and prior to that, served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Columbia Bank since March 2014. He joined Columbia Bank as Senior Vice President and Oregon Group Manager in April 2013, when Columbia acquired West Coast Bancorp, where Mr. Robbins had served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer since 2007. Mr. Robbins has over 35 years of banking experience and has held senior level positions with Wells Fargo Bank and community banks in the Pacific Northwest. He holds an M.B.A. from the University of Oregon and a B.S. in Business Administration from Lewis and Clark College. He currently serves on the boards of directors for the Multicare Foundation, Pacific Coast Bankers School (PCBS) and the Oregon Bankers Association. As CEO and a director, Mr. Robbins serves as the primary liaison between the Board and management, and as the executive with overall responsibility for executing the Company’s strategic plan. |
| | |
 | | Elizabeth W. Seaton | Director since 2014 |
| |
| Ms. Seaton, 55,58, is the President and CEO of Northern Aviation Services, an air cargo company headquartered in Seattle. She served as Senior Vice President of Operations for Saltchuk Resources Inc., a family of diversified transportation and fuel distribution companies, headquartered in Seattle.Seattle from 2014 to 2018. Ms. Seaton served as Vice President of Strategic Planning and Corporate Development for Weyerhaeuser Company from 2008 to 2014. Her career with Weyerhaeuser spanned over twenty years, and included positions in strategic planning, capital investments and business leadership. Prior to Weyerhaeuser, she was Principal for Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm. Ms. Seaton is a graduate of Princeton University, holds a J.D./M.B.A. from the University of Chicago and is a member of the California Bar. She has more than ten years of experience as a board member and advisor to a wide range of organizations, including Liaison Technologies, and she contributes to her community as the Finance Committee Chair and ViceBoard Chair of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and Hawaii. Her broad experience in business leadership, change management, strategic development, mergers and acquisitions and enterprise risk management provides a valuable resource to the Board. |
| | |
 | | William |
 | | Janine T. Weyerhaeuser | Terrano | Director since 19982018 |
| |
| | Mr. Weyerhaeuser, 72,Ms. Terrano, 57, has extensive business leadership expertise and experience building companies in the technology sector. Ms. Terrano founded Business Internet Services in 1996 and grew the organization to serve the web application development needs of large commercial and government clients. In 1999, Ms. Terrano launched Topia Technology, Inc. Topia’s patented solutions securely manage the movement of data between disparate platforms, components and devices, allowing commercial and government clients to connect new technologies to complex legacy systems. Ms. Terrano is a resident of Tacoma, Washington and attended Carroll College, University of Washington and University of Oklahoma. She currently serves on the ChairmanBoards of MultiCare Health Systems, Geneva Foundation and Tacoma Art Museum. Ms. Terrano is a TEDx speaker and was the recipient of the Board of Columbia. He is also a Director of eHarmony, an online dating website for singles. He is the former Chairman of Comerco, Inc., a holding company for Yelm Telephone Company, and Rock Island Company, a private investment company. He is also a former Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of Potlatch Corporation, a forest products company, and a former Director of Clearwater Paper Corporation, a forest products company. Mr. Weyerhaeuser received his undergraduate degree from Stanford University and his Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Fuller Theological Seminary. He had a private practice in Tacoma from 1975-1998. He is a Trustee and past Chairman of the Board of the2013 University of Puget Sound, a DirectorWashington Tacoma Small Business Leader award. Her depth of LeMay-America’s Car Museum, Trusteetechnology, data security and former President of the Seattle Opera Board of Trustees and past President of the Pacific Harbors Council, Boy Scouts of America. Among other past volunteer activities, Mr. Weyerhaeuser has served as President of the Board of the Tacoma Art Museum and as a Director of The Greater Tacoma Community Foundation. Mr. Weyerhaeuser’s diverse background and public companybusiness experience providesmake her a valuable perspectiveresource to the Board.
|
The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FORFOR”” each of the nominees for director.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCCORPORATE GOVERNANCEE
GuidelinesGuidelines
The Board is committed to sound business practices, transparency in financial reporting and high standards of corporate governance. We operate within a comprehensive plan of corporate governance with the purpose of defining responsibilities, setting high standards of professional and personal conduct and assuring compliance with such responsibilities and standards. We regularly monitor developments in the area of corporate governance and our corporate governance policies, practices and committee charters are reviewed periodically and updated as necessary to reflect changes in regulatory requirements and evolving oversight practices.
Board and Company Leadership Structure
The Board is committed to maintaining an independent board, and an overwhelming majority has been comprised of outside directors for many years. It has further been the practice of Columbia to separate the duties of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In keeping with good corporate governance practices, the Board believes that the separation of the duties of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer eliminates any inherent conflict of interest that may arise when the roles are combined, and that an independent director can best provide the leadership and objectivity required as Chairman.
Director QualificationDirector Qualificationss
The Board believes each of the Company’s directors should bring a rich mix of qualities and skills to the Board. All of our directors bring to the Board a wealth of leadership experience derived from their service in a variety of professional and executive positions and extensive board experience.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for the oversight and nomination process for director nominees. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has not historically adopted formal “director qualification standards” for recommended nominees. However, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee annually reviews the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each director and nominee as part of its evaluation of whether these are the right individuals to serve on Columbia’s Board to help Columbia successfully meet its strategic plans. Because directors are elected for one-year terms, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has an annual opportunity to assess these factors and, if appropriate, determine not to re-nominate any director. A more detailed discussion regarding the considerations given by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee when considering director nominees is set forth below in the section entitled“Board Structure and Compensation—Board Committees—Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.”
The biographical information set forth above summarizes the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that Columbia believes qualifies each director to serve on the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board believe each respective director’s professional and business acumen and board experience, and the total mix of all directors’ experience and skills, are beneficial to the Company and the Board.
Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Documents
We have adopted a Code of Ethics for senior financial officers, which applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and any persons performing similar functions.
You can access our Code of Ethics, Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Personnel and Compensation Committee charters, Corporate Governance Policy, and our Bylaws in the “About—Investor Relations—Governance Documents” section of our website at www.columbiabank.com, or by writing to: Columbia Banking System, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 1301 “A” Street, Tacoma, Washington, 98402-4200.
Director Independence
Director Independence
With the assistance of legal counsel to Columbia, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has reviewed the applicable legal standards for Board and committee member independence, and the criteria applied to determine “audit committee financial expert” status. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has also reviewed the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each of the directors, which included questions regarding any potential director-affiliated transactions.
The Board then analyzed the independence of each director and nominee and determined that the following members of the Board meet the standards regarding “independence” required by applicable law, regulation and NASDAQ listing standards, and that each such director is free of relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment. In determining the independence of each director, the Board considered many factors, including any loans to the directors, each of which (i) were made in the ordinary course of business; (ii) were substantially made on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Company or the Bank; and (iii) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Such arrangements are discussed in detail in the section entitled“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Based on these standards, the Board has determined that each of the following current non-employee directors and director nominees is independent:
| | |
| Craig D. Eerkes | | Thomas M. Hulbert |
Ford Elsaesser | | Michelle M. Lantow |
| Ford Elsaesser | Randal L. Lund |
| Mark A. Finkelstein | | S. Mae Fujita Numata |
David A. Dietzler | Eric S. Forrest | Elizabeth W. Seaton |
John P. FolsomThomas M. Hulbert | | WilliamJanine T. WeyerhaeuserTerrano |
Based on the standards described above, the Board determined that Melanie J. Dressel,Hadley S. Robbins, who serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is not independent because shehe is an executive officer of the Company.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider ParticipationParticipation
During 2015,2018, the Personnel and Compensation Committee consisted of Mr. Hulbert (Chair until April 22, 2015)Ms. Lantow (Chair), Mr. Eerkes, Ms. Lantow (Chair effective April 22, 2015)Mr. Finkelstein, Mr. Forrest , Mr. Hulbert and Ms. Numata and Frederick Goldberg. Mr. Goldberg retired from the Board on April 22, 2015 and no longer served on the committee as of such date, and Mr. FinkelsteinWeyerhaeuser, who was added to the committee effective that date.appointed in June, 2018. During 2015,2018, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee (or equivalent body) or board of directors of another entity whose executive officer served on the Personnel and Compensation Committee.
Shareholder Communications with the BoardBoard
Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board by writing to the Chairman of the Board c/o Columbia’s Corporate Secretary, Columbia Banking System, Inc., 1301 “A” Street, Tacoma, Washington, 98402-4200. These communications will be reviewed by our Corporate Secretary and if they are relevant to, and consistent with, our operations and policies, they will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board.
BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION
2015
2018 Board Meetings
The Board met 1311 times during 2015.2018. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served. Columbia directors are expected to attend the annual shareholder meeting. Last year, all of our directors who were then serving on the Board, with the exception of Ms. Seaton, attended the annual shareholder meeting. During 2015,2018, the independent directors held 1011 meetings without management present.
Board CommitteBoard Committeeses
The Board has established, among others, an Audit Committee, a Personnel and Compensation Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and an Enterprise Risk Management Committee.
The following table shows the membership of these committees during 2015.2018.
Committee Membership
| Name | Audit | | Compensation | | Nominating | | E.R.M. |
| David A. Dietzler | þ* | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ |
| Craig D. Eerkes(1) | ¨ | | þ | | þ* | | ¨ |
| Ford Elsaesser | þ | | ¨ | | þ | | ¨ |
| Mark A. Finkelstein(2) | ¨ | | þ | | þ | | ¨ |
| John P. Folsom(3) | þ | | ¨ | | þ | | þ* |
| Eric S. Forrest(4) | ¨ | | þ | | ¨ | | þ |
| Thomas M. Hulbert | þ | | þ | | ¨ | | ¨ |
| Michelle M. Lantow(5) | þ | | þ * | | þ | | ¨ |
| Randal Lund(6) | þ | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ |
| S. Mae Fujita Numata | þ | | þ | | þ | | ¨ |
| Elizabeth W. Seaton(7) | ¨ | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ* |
| Janine Terrano | þ | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ |
| William T. Weyerhaeuser(8) | ¨ | | þ | | þ* | | ¨ |
| Total Meetings in 2018 | 9 | | 8 | | 4 | | 6 |
| | | | | | | | |
Name
| | Audit
| | Compensation
| | Nominating
| | E.R.M.
|
David A. Dietzler (1)
| | þ * | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ |
Craig D. Eerkes
| | ¨ | | þ | | ¨ | | þ |
Ford Elsaesser (2)
| | þ | | ¨ | | þ | | ¨ |
Mark A. Finkelstein (3)
| | ¨ | | þ | | ¨ | | þ |
John P. Folsom (4)
| | þ * | | ¨ | | þ | | þ * |
Frederick M. Goldberg (5)
| | ¨ | | þ | | ¨ | | þ |
Thomas M. Hulbert (6)
| | þ | | þ * | | þ | | ¨ |
Michelle M. Lantow (7)
| | ¨ | | þ * | | þ | | ¨ |
S. Mae Fujita Numata (8)
| | þ | | þ | | þ | | ¨ |
Daniel C. Regis (9)
| | þ | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ * |
Elizabeth W. Seaton
| | ¨ | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ |
William T. Weyerhaeuser
| | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ * | | ¨ |
James M. Will (10)
| | ¨ | | ¨ | | ¨ | | þ |
Total Meetings in 2015
| | 9 | | 6 | | 6 | | 4 |
| (1) | Mr. DietzlerEerkes served on the ERM Committee until June 2018. He was appointed Chair of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee effective April 22, 2015. |
(2) | Mr. Elsaesser was named to the Nominating Committee effective April 22, 2015. (3) Mr. Finkelstein wasand named to the Compensation Committee effective April 22, 2015.as its Chair in June 2018. |
(4) | (2) | Mr. Folsom stepped down asFinkelstein served on the AuditERM Committee Chairuntil, and was appointed Chair of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee effective April 22, 2015. |
(5) | Mr. Goldberg served on the Enterprise Risk Management and Compensation Committees until his retirement on April 22, 2015. |
(6) | Mr. Hulbert stepped down as the Compensation Committee Chair and as a member of the Nominating Committee effective April 22, 2015. |
(7) | Ms. Lantow was appointed Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating Committee effective April 22, 2015. |
(8) | Ms. Numata was named to the Nominating Committee effective April 22, 2015.in, June 2018. |
(9) | (3) | Mr. RegisFolsom served on the AuditNominating Committee and as Chair of the Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee until his retirement on April 22, 2015.June 2018. |
(10) | (4) | Mr. WillForrest was appointed to the ERM Committee in June 2018. |
| (5) | Ms. Lantow served on the Enterprise Risk ManagementNominating Committee until, his retirement on April 22, 2015.and was appointed to the Audit Committee in, June 2018. |
| (6) | Mr. Lund was appointed to the ERM Committee in June 2018. |
| (7) | Ms. Seaton was appointed Chair of the ERM Committee in June 2018. |
| (8) | Mr. Weyerhaeuser served as Chair of the Nominating Committee until June 2018. He was appointed to the Compensation Committee in June 2018. |
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is comprised of fiveeight directors, each of whom is considered “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee operates under a formal written charter, a copy of which is posted on our website.website at www.columbiabank.com. The Board has determined that each of Mr. Dietzler, Ms. Lantow, Mr. Lund and Ms. Numata are “Audit Committee Financial Experts” as defined by SEC rules. Mr. Regis served on the Audit Committee until his retirement from the Board on April 22, 2015.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of the quality and integrity of Columbia’s financial statements, its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of its independent auditors, the performance of its internal audit function and independent auditors and other significant financial matters. In discharging its duties, the Audit Committee is expected to, among other things:
have the sole authority to appoint, retain, compensate, oversee, evaluate and replace the independent auditors;
| ● | have the sole authority to appoint, retain, compensate, oversee, evaluate and replace the independent auditors; |
review and approve the engagement of the independent auditors to perform audit and non-audit services and related fees;
| ● | review and approve the engagement of the independent auditors to perform audit and non-audit services and related fees; |
meet independently with the internal auditing department, independent auditors and senior management;
| ● | meet independently with the internal auditing department, independent auditors and senior management; |
review the integrity of the financial reporting process;
| ● | review the integrity of the financial reporting process; |
review the financial reports and disclosures submitted to appropriate regulatory authorities;
| ● | review the financial reports and disclosures submitted to appropriate regulatory authorities; |
maintain procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding financial matters; and
| ● | maintain procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding financial matters; and |
| ● | review and approve related party transactions. |
review and approve related party transactions.
Personnel and Compensation Committee. The Personnel and Compensation Committee is comprised of fiveseven directors, each of whom is considered independent as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC and IRS rules. Mr. Goldberg was member of the committee until his retirement from the Board on April 22, 2015. The Personnel and Compensation Committee is charged with the responsibility of reviewing the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other key employees and determines, approves and reports to the Board on the elements of their compensation and long-term equity based incentives. The committee may periodically retain an independent consultant to assist the committee in its deliberations regarding executive compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other key executives. The committee is directly responsible and has full authority for the appointment, compensation and oversight of compensation consultants, legal counsel and any other advisors retained by the committee. The committee solicits and receives input and recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer with respect to the compensation of the other executive officers. In addition, the Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer assists the committee in its work.
In 2015, the
The Personnel and Compensation Committee commissioned Pearl Meyer and Partners (“Pearl Meyer”), an independent outside compensation consultant, to conduct a study in June 2017 of the Company’s executive compensation compared to a peer group comprised of other publicly traded financial services companies. The committee has used this report as a reference in making compensation decisions. The Pearl Meyer report provided information on executive base salaries and short-term and long-term incentives based on competitive data from published proxy filings of an updateda peer group of 1617 bank holding companies. Further information relating to the Pearl Meyer report is discussed in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis.”.”
In addition, the Personnel and Compensation Committee:
reviews all employee benefit plans; and
| ● | reviews all employee benefit plans; and |
| ● | makes determinations in connection with compensation matters as may be necessary or advisable. |
makes determinations in connection with compensation matters as may be necessary or advisable.
The Personnel and Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is posted on our website.website at www.columbiabank.com. The committee meets as needed, and may delegate to one or more of its members the responsibility of meeting with consultants and management to obtain information for presentation and consideration by the entire committee.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is currently comprised of five directors, each of whom is considered “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ listing standards, andstandards. The committee is responsible for recommending a slate of directors to the full Board for election at the annual meeting, recommending directors to fill vacancies as they occur, monitoring Columbia’s corporate governance principles and practices and making appropriate recommendations for enhancements or other changes to the full Board.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders provided that the recommendations are made in accordance with the procedures described in this proxy statement under the section “General“ Information—General Information—When are proposals and director nominations for the 20172020 Annual Meeting due?” The committee evaluates all candidates, including shareholder-proposed candidates, using generally the same methods and criteria. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee operates under a formal written charter, a copy of which is posted on our website.website at www.columbiabank.com.
In deciding whether to recommend incumbent directors for re-nomination, the committee evaluates Columbia’s evolving needs and assesses the effectiveness and contributions of its existing directors. The committee is authorized to establish guidelines for the qualification, evaluation and selection of new directors to serve on the Board. The committee has not adopted, nor does it anticipate adopting, specific minimum qualifications for committee-recommended nominees, nor has the committee adopted a formal policy relating to Board diversity, although the committee and the Board value and seek to include members with a diversity of backgrounds,in gender, age, race, professional experience and skills relevant to the Company. The committee instead evaluates each nominee on a case-by-case basis, including assessment of each nominee’s business experience, involvement in the communities served by Columbia, diversity and special skills. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also evaluates whether the nominee’s skills are complementary to existing Board members’ skills, and the Board’s need for operational, management, financial, technological or other expertise.
The committee has the authority and responsibility to monitor and review the appropriateness of the Company’s principles and practices of corporate governance including its Corporate Governance Policy, in light of emerging standards and best practices and the needs of the Company and its shareholders, and make such recommendations to the full Board as the Committee considers appropriate. The committee also has the authority and responsibility to review the level and form of director compensation, taking into account such factors as the compensation paid to directors of comparable companies, and recommends any changes to the full Board for consideration. The process and procedures used in determining Board compensation for 20152018 are discussed in the section below.below.
Enterprise Risk Management Committee. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee (the “ERM Committee”) was formed in 2009 and is comprised of fivesix directors, each of whom is considered independent under NASDAQ rules. Messrs. Goldberg, Regis and Will were members of the ERM Committee and discontinued their service after their retirement from the Board in April 22, 2015. The ERM Committee works closely with the Audit Committee and is responsible for the oversight of Columbia’s policies, procedures, and practices related to business, market, and operational risks as they impact the strategic, operational, reporting, and compliance objectives of its strategic plan. The ERM Committee is responsible for reporting risk issues and events to the Board and providing the Board with necessary oversight and advice to set risk tolerances. In 2018, the Company appointed a Chief Risk Officer who assists the committee in its work.
Risk OversigRisk Oversightht
The Board has ultimate authority and responsibility for overseeing risk management at Columbia. Some aspects of risk oversight are fulfilled at the full Board level. For example, the Board regularly receives reports from management on credit risk, liquidity risk and operational risk.risk, including cybersecurity. The Board delegates other aspects of its risk oversight function to its committees. The Audit Committee oversees financial, accounting and internal control risk management; the head of the Company’s internal audit function reports directly to the Audit Committee. The executive officers have regularly reportreported directly to the entire Board and to appropriate Board committees with respect to the risks they are responsible for managing.
The ERM Committee is responsible for the oversight of Columbia’s policies, procedures, and practices related to business, market, and operational risks as they impact the strategic, operational, reporting, and compliance objectives of its strategic plan. The ERM Committee defines the Company’s overarching risk objectives through risk policies, limits and a risk appetite statement.
The Personnel and Compensation Committee oversees the management of risks that may be posed by the Company’s compensation practices and programs. As part of this process, the Personnel and Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the compensation policies and practices for all employees, not just executive management. In its review of these policies and practices, the Personnel and Compensation Committee has determined that the current policies and practices do not create or encourage risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Director CompensatioDirector Compensationn
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has authority over director compensation subject to the Board’s authority to approve changes. Directors receive compensation in the form of cash and, as applicable, equity awards in the form of restricted stock or, in the past, stock options. We do not pay directors who are also employees of Columbia or Columbia Bank additional compensation for their service as directors.
The following table shows compensation paid or accrued for the last fiscal year to our non-employee directors. The footnotes to the table describe the details of each form of compensation paid to directors.
2015 Director Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
(1) | | | Stock Awards
($)
(2) | | | Change In Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
Earnings
(3) | | | Total
($) | |
David A. Dietzler | | $ | 73,000 | | | $ | 66,040 | | | | — | | | $ | 139,040 | |
Craig D. Eerkes | | | 59,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 125,040 | |
Ford Elsaesser | | | 68,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 134,040 | |
Mark A. Finkelstein | | | 61,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 127,040 | |
John P. Folsom | | | 84,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 150,040 | |
Frederick M. Goldberg * | | | 25,667 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,448 | | | | 27,115 | |
Thomas M. Hulbert | | | 80,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 146,040 | |
Michelle M. Lantow | | | 65,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 131,040 | |
S. Mae Fujita Numata | | | 64,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 130,040 | |
Daniel C. Regis * | | | 22,667 | | | | 0 | | | | — | | | | 22,667 | |
Elizabeth W. Seaton | | | 57,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 123,040 | |
William T. Weyerhaeuser | | | 115,000 | | | | 66,040 | | | | — | | | | 181,040 | |
James M. Will * | | | 21,667 | | | | 0 | | | | — | | | | 21,667 | |
* | Messrs. Goldberg, Regis and Will retired from the Board of Directors, effective April 22, 2015. |
(1) | Amount shown for Mr. Dietzler represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $10,000 received as chairman of the Audit Committee, beginning in May 2015; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $17,000, respectively. |
Amount shown for Mr. Eerkes represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $13,000, respectively
Amount shown for Mr. Elsaesser represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $6,000 received as chairman of the Trust Committee; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $16,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Finkelstein represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $15,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Folsom represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $5,000 received as chairman of the Audit Committee until May 2015; (iii) $6,000 received as chairman of the ERM
Committee, beginning in May 2015; and (iv) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $27,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Goldberg represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $11,667 (ii) $3,000 received as chairman of the M&A Committee until his retirement in April 2015; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $4,000 and $7,000, respectively, through his retirement date of April 22, 2015.
Amount shown for Mr. Hulbert represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $4,000 received as chairman of the Compensation Committee until May 2015; (iii) $6,000 received as chairman of the M&A Committee beginning in May 2015; and (iv) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $24,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Ms. Lantow represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $8,000 received as chairwoman of the Compensation Committee beginning in May 2015; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $10,000 and $12,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Ms. Numata represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $18,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr.��Regis represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $11,667; (ii) $3,000 received as chairman of the ERM Committee until May 2015; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $4,000 and $4,000, respectively through his retirement date of April 22, 2015.
Amount shown for Ms. Seaton represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $10,000 and $12,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Weyerhaeuser represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $45,000 received as Chairman of the Board; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $24,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Will represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $11,667; (ii) $3,000 received as Chairman of the Trust Committee until May 2015; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $4,000 and $3,000, respectively, through his retirement date of April 22, 2015.
(2) | Represents a restricted stock award of 2,000 shares granted to each director on June 24, 2015 at the grant date fair value. The fair value of these awards was determined in accordance with the Compensation—Stock Compensation topic of the FASB ASC 718. Assumptions used to calculate these amounts are set forth in the notes to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended 2015, included in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report. |
(3) | Represents above-market earnings on Mr. Goldberg’s deferred compensation account, the material terms of which are described below under“Deferred Compensation Plan.” |
Cash Compensation. Non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer as compensation plus a per-meeting attendance fee for service as a director. Members of the ERM, Audit, Personnel and Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees, respectively, receive an additional per meeting attendance fee for committee meetings. The Chairman of the Board and Chairmenthe Chairs of the Audit, the Personnel and Compensation, ERM and certain other committees receive an additional retainer in light of the increased demands associated with those positions. Non-employee directors may elect to defer the receipt of meeting and/or director fees in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan.
Equity Compensation. Non-employee directors may from time to time be granted restricted stock awards pursuant to our Current2018 Equity Compensation Plan, the material terms of which are discussed under the section “Executive“ Compensation—Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation.Compensation.” Restricted stock awards generally vest over a predeterminedpre-determined period.
Long Term Care Program. In 2001, we implemented a long-term care program for directors serving at that time, which provides benefits in the event those individuals become chronically ill. The coverage is for a period of three years up to a lifetime, depending on the age of the director, and the amount of the benefit is based on the director’s years of service with Columbia after the inception of the long-term care program. We paid a one-time premium for the long-term care policies. Expenses are allocated to the
directors participating in the program on an annual basis. All directors covered by this plan are fully vested. The long-term care program was available to all directors when the plan was implemented, including executive officers that were also directors. We have purchased Bank Owned Life Insurance policies to fund this program. The Board has no plans to extend the program to any officers or directors who were not directors in 2001.
Deferred Compensation Plan. We maintain a deferred compensation plan known as the 401 Plus Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for certain directors, a select group of senior management and key employees, as designated by resolution of the Board. The Deferred Compensation Plan generally provides for the deferral of certain taxable income earned by participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan. Non-employee directors may elect to have any portion, up to 100%, of his or her director’s fees deferred.
Stock Ownership Guidelines.The Board has approved stock ownership guidelines that requireCompany’s Stock Ownership Policy requires non-executive directors to achieve a stock ownership position of at least 7,000hold shares withinequal in value to five years of joiningtimes the Board.annual Board cash retainer. As of year-end 2015,2018, all non-executive directors owned shares of Columbia’s stock. At year-end 2015,satisfied the Stock Ownership Policy requirements other than Mr. Dietzler,Lund, who joined the Board in April 2013,2017, and Ms. Seaton,Terrano, who joined the Board in May 2014,2018. See “Stock Ownership Guidelines and Messrs.No Hedging” in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis below for additional details regarding the Stock Ownership Policy
The following table shows compensation paid or accrued for the last fiscal year to our non-employee directors. The footnotes to the table describe the details of each form of compensation paid to directors.
2018 Director Compensation Table
| Name | | Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
(1) | | | Stock Awards
($)
(2) | | | Option Awards ($) | | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation | | | Change In Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
Earnings
(3) | | | All Other
Compensation
($) | | | Total
($) | |
| David A. Dietzler | | $ | 78,000 | | | $ | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 147,974 | |
| Craig D. Eerkes | | | 99,250 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 169,224 | |
| Ford Elsaesser | | | 72,000 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 141,974 | |
| Mark A. Finkelstein | | | 67,000 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 136,974 | |
| John P. Folsom | | | 75,750 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 145,724 | |
| Eric Forrest | | | 66,000 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 346 | | | | — | | | | 136,320 | |
| Thomas M. Hulbert | | | 82,000 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 151,974 | |
| Michelle M. Lantow | | | 80,000 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,158
|
| | | — | | | | 154,132
| |
| Randal Lund | | | 69,000 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 138,974 | |
| S. Mae Fujita Numata | | | 69,000 | | | | 69,974 | | | |
| | | |
| | | | 2,857
| | | | — | | | | 141,831 | |
| Elizabeth W. Seaton | | | 69,250 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 139,224 | |
| Janine Terrano | | | 65,000 | | | | 107,704 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 172,704 | |
William T.Weyerhaeuser | | | 85,750 | | | | 69,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 155,724 | |
| (1) | Amount shown for Mr. Dietzler represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $15,000 received as chairman of the Audit Committee; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $17,000, respectively. |
Amount shown for Mr. Eerkes and Finkelstein, bothrepresents (i) a retainer in the amount of whom joined$35,000; (ii) $26,250 received as Chairman of the Board in September 2014, have not yet met the ownership guidelines but are expected to within the five year deadline specifiedfrom June through December; (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $27,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Elsaesser represents (i) a retainer in the guidelines. All other directors have exceededamount of $35,000; (ii) $9,000 received as chairman of Columbia Trust Company; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $17,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Finkelstein represents (i) a retainer in the
ownership guidelines.Reportamount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $21,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Folsom represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $3,750 received as chairman of the PersonnelERM Committee from January through May; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $26,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Forrest represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $20,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Hulbert represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $9,000 received as chairman of the M&A Committee; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $27,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Ms. Lantow represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $12,000 received as chairwoman of the Compensation Committee; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $22,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Lund represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $23,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Ms. Numata represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $23,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Ms. Seaton represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $5,250 received as chairwoman of the ERM Committee from June through December; and aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $10,000 and $19,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Ms. Terrano represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; and (ii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $11,000 and $19,000, respectively.
Amount shown for Mr. Weyerhaeuser represents (i) a retainer in the amount of $35,000; (ii) $18,750 received as Chairman of the Board from January through May; and (iii) aggregate per meeting board and committee attendance fees of $10,000 and $22,000, respectively.
| (2) | For each director other than Ms. Terrano, represents a restricted stock award of 1,691 shares granted on June 27, 2018 at the grant date fair value. For Ms. Terrano, includes a restricted stock award of 834 shares granted on January 24, 2018 when she joined the Board, which represents a prorated portion of the 2017 – 2018 Board restricted stock award. The fair value of these awards was determined in accordance with the Compensation—Stock Compensation topic of the FASB ASC 718. Assumptions used to calculate these amounts are set forth in the notes to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended 2018, included in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report. |
| (3) | Represents above-market earnings on Mr. Forrest’s, Ms. Lantow’s and Ms. Numata’s deferred compensation accounts, the material terms of which are described below under “Deferred Compensation Plan.” |
Compensation Committee on Executive CompensationReport
The Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board makes the following report which, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of Columbia’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, will not be incorporated by reference into any such filings and will not otherwise be deemed to be proxy soliciting materials or to be filed under such Acts.
The Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board met and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, and based on that review and discussion, the committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included as part of this proxy statement and the
20152018 10-K Annual Report.
Members of the Personnel and Compensation Committee
Michelle M. Lantow, Chairwoman
Craig D. Eerkes
Eric S. Forrest
William T. Weyerhaeuser
EXECUEXECUTIVETIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation DisCompensation Discussioncussion & AnalysisColumbia has substantially met our long-held goal of being a leading Pacific Northwest regional community bank, with 149 branches in Washington, Oregon and Idaho.
The Personnel and Compensation Committee (as referred to in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the “Committee”) made compensation decisions for our executive team in the context of
this achievementColumbia’s core performance results and other
core performance results.2015 Financial Results
Consolidated net income for 2015 was a record $98.8 million, representing a 21% increase compared to the prior year. The increase in net income was a result of record loan production and outstanding deposit growth, along with improved operating leverage achieved through increased noninterest income and diligent expense management.
| | •2018 Financial Results |
| ● | Consolidated net income for 2018 was a record $172.9 million, representing a 53% increase compared to the prior year. The increase in net income was a result of higher net interest income primarily due to income from interest-earning assets acquired in the Pacific Continental acquisition, which closed on November 1, 2017. Higher rates on earning assets and a decrease in income tax expense in 2018 also contributed to the increase in net income compared to 2017. | ● | NoninterestOperating noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses(1)to average assets(1), a measure of operating efficiency, improved significantly during 2015,2018, declining to 2.96%2.60% from 3.09%2.67% in 2014.2017. Reported noninterest expense to average assets improved significantly in 2018, decreasing to 3.08% in 2015,2.68% compared to 3.20%2.87% in 2014.2017 as a result of higher average assets resulting from the Pacific Continental acquisition.
|
| | | |
| ● | Record loan originations for 2018 of $1.43 billion, with loan growth of $32.9 million. | ● | Credit quality remained solid, with total nonperforming assets to period-end assets declining to 0.46% compared to 0.63% at December 31, 2017. |
| | |
| ● | Our ongoing commitment to our customers and the communities we serve resulted in a low cost deposit base and a core deposit ratio of 95%. Our 12 basis points average cost of total deposits is an important factor in the stability of our net interest margin. | |
| 2018 Shareholder Return |
| ● | Shareholder value. Our shareholders realized a 14% decline in total return on their investment during 2018. The KBW Regional Banking and NASDAQ Composite Indexes had declines in total returns of 18% and 3% respectively, during 2018. Our three-year total shareholder return is 23%, compared to returns of 17% and 37% for the KBW Regional Banking and NASDAQ Composite Indexes, respectively. |
| |
| ● | Increases in regular dividends. We raised our regular cash dividend from $0.88 to $1.00 per share during 2018, and paid a special dividend of $0.14 during the year. Our dividend payout ratio was 48% for 2018 compared to 47% for 2017. Our 2018 dividend yield was 3%, based on our closing price at December 31, 2018. |
Loan growthfor 2015 was 7%, or approximately $370 million, due to record loan originations for the year of $1.12 billion.
Credit qualitycontinued to improve, with total nonperforming assets to period-end assets declining to 0.39% compared to 0.62% at December 31, 2014.
Noninterest incomebefore the change in FDIC loss-sharing asset increased 20%, or $15.7 million, compared to 2014, due in part to the execution of several key initiatives aimed at improving noninterest income.
Our ongoing commitment to our customers and the communities we serve resulted in a low cost deposit base and a core deposit ratio of 96%. Our low cost core deposits are an important factor in the stability of our net interest margin. Core deposit growth for 2015 was $507.9 million, or approximately 8%.
2015 Shareholder Return
Continued increase in shareholder value. Our shareholders realized a 23% total return on their investment during 2015, substantially outperforming relevant banking indexes. The KBW Regional Banking (KRX) and NASDAQ Bank Indexes had total returns of 6% and 8% respectively, during 2015. Our three-year total return to shareholders is 100%.
Significant increases in dividends. We raised our regular cash dividend from $0.54 to $0.70 per share during 2015, and we paid out $0.64 per share in special dividends, compared to $0.40 in 2014. Together, our regular and special dividends increased 43% from the prior year. Our regular dividend payout ratio was 41% for 2015. Including the special dividends, our payout ratio was 78% for 2015, resulting in a dividend yield of 5%.
| (1) | NoninterestOperating noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses and its ratio to average assets areis a non-GAAP financial measures.measure. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
|
2015 Milestones
Market Share. As of June 30, 2015, Columbia Bank ranked eighth in deposit market share out of 90 institutions in Washington, seventh out of 51 in Oregon and eleventh out of 33 in Idaho.21
| ● | Market Share. As of June 30, 2018, Columbia Bank ranked seventh in deposit market share in the Northwest. The bank ranked eighth in deposit market share out of 79 institutions in Washington, seventh out of 46 in Oregon and 14th out of 32 in Idaho. | ● | Income, Loan Production and Deposits. Columbia achieved record loan production of $1.43 billion for the year and record net income of $172.9 million. Deposits, including core deposits, continued to exceed $10 billion at December 31, 2018. |
| ● | Industry Accolades. For the 8th consecutive year, Columbia Bank was again recognized byForbeson its 20162019 list of “America’s Best Banks,” ranking 19thin the country. The rankings were based on asset quality, capital adequacy, net interest margin and profitability of the nation’s 100 largest publicly traded banks and thrifts. | ● | Outstanding Corporate Citizen. Columbia fosters a culture of giving back to the communities where we live and conduct business. We support numerous nonprofit organizations both monetarily and through the volunteer efforts of our employees. In 2018, we provided support to organizations that serve the homeless, the arts, chambers of commerce, economic development organizations, public school districts, and numerous other causes. Through generous donations from customers, employees and the community, Columbia’s fourth annual “Warm Hearts Winter Drive” raised $257,033 and 6,542 warm winter items to benefit homeless shelters across the Northwest. In addition, our board of directors was recognized for its corporate stewardship including the Board Governance Award by Seattle Business Magazine and a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Puget Sound Business Journal for past board chairman, William Weyerhaeuser. |
| ● | • | | Workplace Accolades. Our continued commitment to employees contributed to Columbia Bank being named as one of “Washington’s Best Workplaces” 2015in 2018 by thePuget Sound Business Journalfor the ninth12th consecutive year.year, and a Top Workplaces ranking from the Oregonian. |
| ● | 25th Anniversary. In 2018, Columbia Bank celebrated its 25th anniversary. To celebrate this milestone, Columbia Bank launched its anniversary community giving campaign which celebrates the positive impact that Columbia Bank has had on growth opportunities for families, businesses, and nonprofit organizations throughout the Northwest. Four $25,000 grants were awarded to nonprofit organizations in the Northwest. In addition, 10,000 financial literacy kits were distributed to children throughout Columbia’s geographic footprint. |
Record Income, Loan Production andDeposits. Columbia achieved record loan production of $1.12 billion for the year and record net income of $98.8 million. Deposits, including core deposits, increased to over $7 billion for the first time in company history.22
Outstanding Corporate Citizen. Columbia strives to be an outstanding corporate citizen and fosters a culture of giving back to the communities where we live and conduct business. We support many nonprofit organizations both monetarily and through the volunteer efforts of our employees. In 2015, we provided support to organizations that serve the homeless, the arts, chambers of commerce, economic development organizations, public school districts, and numerous other causes.
Target Direct Compensation
2015 Compensation Highlights
Continued Use of Performance-Based Equity Awards. To strengthen the alignment between long term incentive compensation and the Company’s achievement of its long term performance objectives and shareholders’ interests, the Committee continued its practice of granting performance-based equity awards for executives.
Emphasis on Objective Short-Term Performance Goals. To strengthen the alignment between annual incentive compensation and the Company’s achievement of its short term objectives, the Committee emphasized measurable performance metrics in the 2015 annual incentive plan.
2015 Compensation Decisions. The Board approved merit-based adjustments to base salaries ranging from 4% to 9% for our Named Executives effective March 2015, paid annual cash incentive awards consistent with our financial results and granted long-term incentive awards with an emphasis on long-term financial performance. Even with these adjustments, total direct compensation for our Named Executives remains below market levels when compared to our peers.
The table below shows the 20152018 total target direct compensation opportunities for our Named Executives. The Committee focuses on target direct compensation as shown below in making annual compensation decisions.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2015 Target Direct Compensation* | |
Named Executive | | Annual
Base
Salary | | | Target
Annual
Incentive | | | Target
Long-Term
Incentive | | | Total | |
Melanie J. Dressel, President and Chief Executive Officer | | $ | 735,000 | | | $ | 367,500 | | | $ | 367,500 | | | $ | 1,470,000 | |
| | | | |
Clint E. Stein, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | $ | 350,000 | | | $ | 140,000 | | | $ | 140,000 | | | $ | 630,000 | |
| | | | |
David C. Lawson, Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer | | $ | 250,000 | | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 450,000 | |
| | | | |
Andrew L. McDonald, Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | 540,000 | |
| | | | |
Hadley S. Robbins, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | | $ | 375,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 675,000 | |
| | | 2018 Target Direct Compensation* | |
| Current Named Executive | | Annual
Base Salary | | | Target
Annual Incentive | | | Target
Long-Term Incentive | | | Total | |
Hadley S. Robbins,
President and Chief Executive Officer | | $ | 730,000 | | | $ | 438,000 | | | $ | 675,000 | | | $ | 1,825,000 | |
Gregory A. Sigrist**
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | | 375,000 | | | | 150,000 | | | | 206,250 | | | | 731,250 | |
Clint E. Stein,
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer*** | | | 427,000 | | | | 213,500 | | | | 277,550 | | | | 918,050 | |
Andrew L. McDonald,
Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer | | | 336,000 | | | | 134,000 | | | | 184,800 | | | | 655,200 | |
David C. Lawson,
Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer | | | 290,000 | | | | 116,000 | | | | 159,500 | | | | 565,500 | |
Kumi Y. Baruffi,
Executive Vice President, General Counsel | | | 290,000 | | | | 116,000 | | | | 159,500 | | | | 565,500 | |
* | The amounts reported differ from the amounts determined under SEC rules as reported for 20152018 in the Summary Compensation Table set forth on page 33.under “Compensation Tables” below. The above table is not a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table set forthTable. |
** The amounts reflected in the table above are Mr. Sigrist’s annual compensation levels. Mr. Sigrist’s base salary and target annual incentive for 2018 were prorated to reflect the portion of 2018 in which he was employed following his start date on page 33.June 4, 2018. Additionally, the one-time sign on cash bonus paid to Mr. Sigrist in connection with his appointment are not included in this table. ***Mr. Stein also served as Chief Financial Officer during 2018 prior to Mr. Sigrist’s hire. |
In keeping with our long-term goal to consistently increase earnings per share and shareholder value, the Committee is guided by the following key principles in determining the compensation of our Named Executives:
| •● | | Accountability for Business Performance. The executives’ compensation in salary, as well as annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation opportunities, should be tied in part to overall Company financial performance. |
| •● | | Accountability for Individual Performance. To encourage and reflect individual contributions to the Company’s performance, compensation should be tied in part to the individual’s performance. |
| •● | | Alignment with Shareholder Interests. Compensation should be tied in part to the Company’s stock performance through the granting of stock awards with multi-year vesting and performance-based vesting, which serves to align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. |
| •● | | Competition. Compensation should reflect the competitive marketplace, so that we can attract, retain, and motivate key executives of superior ability who are critical to our future success. |
| •● | | Reasonable Levels of Compensation. Total compensation opportunities and payouts should be reasonable and not excessive. We do not rigidly target or formulaically set compensation at a specific percentile compared to our peers. However, we do target overall compensation for executive officers in amounts that are roughly in line with the median of our peers. |
| •● | | Independent Oversight. The Committee, composed solely of independent directors, is responsible for reviewing and establishing the compensation for the Named Executives. The Committee periodically receives advice from an independent compensation consultant who has been retained by and reports directly to the Committee and performs no other work for management without the authorization fromof the Committee. In addition, the Committee may choose to review compensation analyses prepared by consultants retained by management. |
| •● | | Risk Management. Compensation policies and practices should align with sound risk management and be structured not to create incentives that subject the Company to excessive risk. Such policies and practices should strike a healthy balance between contributing to the Company’s growth and promoting a conservative exposure to risk. |
Our Key Compensation Best Practices | | | | | | | ü✓ Pay-for-performance ✓ Share ownership guidelines ✓ Double-trigger severance benefits ✓ Independent compensation consultant ✓ Clawback policy ✓ Policy against hedging | | Pay-for-performance | | × | | X No tax gross-ups on severance payments | | | | | ü | | Share ownership guidelines | | × | |
X No equity grants below 100% of fair market value | | | | | ü | | Double-trigger severance benefits | | × | |
X No significant perquisites | | | | | ü | | Independent compensation consultant | | | | | | | | | ü | | Clawback policy | | | | | | | | | ü | | No-hedging policy | | | | |
The compensation tables that appear later in this proxy statement reflect decisions made by the Committee. We encourage you to refer to the tables while reviewing this section in order to understand how our compensation philosophy is put into action. Factors in Setting Overall Compensation Levels When establishing overall compensation opportunities for the Named Executives, the Committee considers the following factors: the Company’s overall performance and performance relative to its peers during the past year, including meeting its financial and other strategic goals;
the executives’ respective levels of responsibility and functions within the Company;
| ● | the Company’s overall performance and performance relative to its peers during the past year, including meeting its financial and other strategic goals; |
each executive’s performance during the past year in meeting individual objectives;
how compensation of our executive officers compares to executives at peer institutions, with a particular focus on financial institutions with similar corporate objectives and comparable asset size;
| ● | the executives’ respective levels of responsibility and functions within the Company; |
alignment of executive compensation decisions and policies with the decisions and policies applicable to other employees;
the need to provide a competitive executive compensation package to attract and retain superior executive talent;
| ● | each executive’s performance during the past year in meeting individual objectives; |
as appropriate, general economic conditions within our market area and the overall banking industry;
the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer in setting compensation for other executives; and
| ● | how compensation of our executives compares to executives at peer institutions, with a particular focus on financial institutions with similar corporate objectives and comparable asset size; |
the results of the prior year’s shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation, which, consistent with prior years, received solid shareholder support in 2015, reflecting our shareholders’ support for our compensation philosophy and the executive compensation decisions made by the Committee.
| ● | the alignment of executive compensation decisions and policies with the decisions and policies applicable to other employees; |
| ● | the need to provide a competitive executive compensation package to attract and retain superior executive talent; |
| ● | as appropriate, general economic conditions within our market area and the overall banking industry; |
| ● | the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer in setting compensation for other executives; and |
| ● | the results of the prior year’s shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation, which, consistent with prior years, received solid shareholder support in 2018, reflecting our shareholders’ support for our compensation philosophy and the executive compensation decisions made by the Committee. |
The Committee generally follows this process for determining executive compensation; however, other discretionary and subjective components may also be considered if appropriate. Role and Relationship of the Compensation Consultant The Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate a compensation consultant and to approve the consultant’s fees and all other terms of the engagement. The Committee has direct access to outside advisors and consultants throughout the year. The Committee engaged Pearl Meyer with respect to recommendations regarding 20152018 executive compensation decisions. The Committee made these decisions in part based on Pearl Meyer’s study of the Company’s executive compensation program in 2013June 2017 (the “2013“2017 Executive Compensation Study”). The Committee also retained the services of Pearl Meyer to conduct a study (the “2015 Executive Compensation Study”) of the Company’s executive compensation program in 2015,, as described below in “The“The Role of Benchmarking.” In accordance with SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards, the Committee took appropriate actions in 20152018 to consider the independence of Pearl Meyer. The 20132017 Executive Compensation Study compared the Company’s executive compensation program to the compensation programs of a peer group comprisingcomprised of other publicly traded financial services companies, as described below. The Committee used the report as a tool in setting the Company’s 2015 compensation program.levels in 2018. Pearl Meyer’s 20132017 Executive Compensation Study provided market observations on executive base salaries and short- and long-term incentive opportunities based on competitive data from published proxy filings of a peer group of 17 bank holding companies. TheIn considering the 2017-2018 peer group, inPearl Meyer considered the 2013 Executive Compensation Study was selected primarily based on total assets, relative to Columbia’s total assets asoperating revenue, market capitalization, and loan mix and revenue mix of December 31, 2012 (taking into account Columbia’s acquisition of West Coast Bancorp) and proportion of lending focused on commercial and industrial loans and consumer mortgages.As previously disclosed,the peer companies, which the Committee took several actions in 2014 as a result ofdetermined to be the 2013 Executive Compensation Study, including the implementation of a new long-term incentive strategy and framework (the “LTI Plan”) with performance-based equity awards.appropriate parameters. The performance-based equity awards granted in 2015 are described in greater detail below under “Compensation Structure—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.” The Committee also considered the data in the 2013 Executive Compensation Study in setting compensation levels in 2015.
Based on the recommendations of Pearl Meyer, the Committee approved a new peer group for market comparisons and benchmarking in April 2015, which replaced the2017-2018 peer group approved for use inby the 2013 Executive Compensation Study. The updated peer groupCommittee consists of the following bank holding companies, which were selected based on total assets as of December 31, 2014, and the proportion of lending focused on commercial and industrial loans and consumer mortgages:
companies:
| | | 20152017-2018 Peer Group | BancFirst Corporation | | IberiaBank Corporation | | BancorpSouth, Inc. | Great Western Bancorp, Inc. | | Banner Corporation | MB Financial, Inc. | First CommonwealthChemical Financial
Corporation
Corporation* | | Old National Penn Bancshares, Inc.Bancorp | FirstCVB Financial Bancorp | | NBT Bancorp Inc. | First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. | Corp. | Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. | First MidwestFinancial Bancorp | Sterling Bancorp | | First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. | | Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.* | | First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. | Trustmark Corporation | | Fulton Financial Corporation* | Western Alliance Bancorporation | | Glacier Bancorp Inc. | |
Trustmark Corporation | | (* Denotes a company added to the peer group in 2015) | | 2017 | | | NBT Bancorp Inc. and Heartland Financial USA, Inc. | | Western Alliance | | | Bancorporation |
| | | Removed were removed from 2013 Peer Group* | PacWest Bancorp | | | Umpqua Holdings Corporation | | | * Removed fromthe peer group duein 2017 because their size and/or loan mix were determined to total assets exceeding $15 billion asno longer fit within the parameters of December 31, 2014.
the peer group. |
Compensation Structure Once the new peer group was approved, the Committee engaged Pearl Meyer to conduct an updated study of the Company’s executive compensation program, which was presented to the Committee in September 2015. Pearl Meyer’s 2015 Executive Compensation Study provided market observations on executive base salaries and short- and long-term incentive opportunities based on competitive data from published proxy filings of the 2015 peer group. In conducting the 2015 Executive Compensation Study, Pearl Meyer also considered compensation at Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc., South State Corporation and Banner Corporation as additional reference points where appropriate as requested by the Committee.
After reviewing the 2015 Executive Compensation Study in September 2015, the Company determined that no mid-year changes to the Company’s executive compensation program were warranted. The Committee will consider the 2015 Executive Compensation Study further in making decisions with respect to future compensation.
Compensation Structure
Principal Elements of Compensation Our overall compensation program for executives currently consists of six key elements: Annual Incentive Compensation
Long-Term Equity Incentives
Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits
General Employee Benefits
| ● | Base Salary | ● | Retirement Benefits | | | | | | ● | Annual Incentive Compensation | ● | Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits | | | | | | ● | Long-Term Equity Incentives | ● | General Employee Benefits |
The combination of these six key elements reinforces our pay-for-performancepay‑for‑performance philosophy and strengthens our ability to attract and retain highly qualified executives in our highly competitive banking environment. We believe that this mix of fixed and variable pay advances both the short- and long-term interests of our business, promotes creating long-termlong‑term shareholder value and helps us recruit and retain top executives. The Committee’s decisions regarding the executive compensation program design and individual pay are made in the context of the total compensation philosophy outlined above, including our financial performance.
Salaries are used to provide a competitive fixed amount of base compensation. Our goal is to provide base salary levels that reflect a combination of factors, including competitive pay levels relative to our peer group (as in effect at the time of the determination), the executives’ individual performance and overall contribution to the organization, the relevant position’s scope of responsibilities, the executives’ experience and tenure, and our overall annual budget, which takes into account Company financial performance. The salaries of the Named Executives are reviewed on an annual basis, as well as at the time of a promotion or other change in responsibilities. As discussed above,In 2018, the Committee approved merit-based adjustments for Ms. Dressel, Mr.to the base salaries of Messrs. Robbins, Stein, Mr. Lawson, Mr. McDonald and Mr. Robbins increased their base salaries byLawson of approximately 4%, 5% , 9%, 6%, 4% and 9%5%, respectively effective March 2015.2018. The Committee also approved an adjustment to the base salary of Ms. Baruffi of approximately 14%, which adjustment was both merit-based and intended to generally reflect market observations from the 2017 Executive Compensation Study. Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Consistent with competitive practices, we believe that a portion of our Named Executives’ target compensation should be at risk, contingent upon the Committee’s assessment of performance. When determining earned annual cash incentive awards, the Committee considers the Company’s performance against pre-established financial performance measures as well as the executive’s individual performance and contribution to the Company’s overall performance. Annual cash incentive awards therefore seek to drive progress toward achieving the Company’s annual business objectives and permit individual performance to be recognized. The
In early 2018, the Committee established target annual cash incentive opportunities for 20152018 equal to 60% of base salary for Mr. Robbins (with a maximum of 90% of base salary), 50% of base salary for Ms. DresselMr. Stein (with a maximum of 75%) and 40% of base salary for Messrs. McDonald and Lawson and Ms. Baruffi (with a maximum of 60% of base salary). In connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer, the other Named Executives.Committee established Mr. Sigrist’s target annual cash incentive opportunity for 2018 equal to 40% of base salary (with a maximum of 60% of base salary). Earned annual incentive awards could range from 0% to 75% of base salary for Ms. Dressel or 0% to 60% of base salary for the other Named Executives,were determined based on the level of achievement of the following performance goals: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Performance Goals | | | | | | | | | | | | Threshold
(50% of
Target) | | | Target
(100% of
Target) | | | Stretch
(150% of
Target) | | | Weighting | | | 2015 Actual | | % Achieved
(Weighted) | Core Return on Average Assets (%)* | | | 0.90 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 40 | % | | 1.22% | | 55% | Growth in Total Loans (%) | | | 3.00 | % | | | 7.10 | % | | | 11.00 | % | | | 15 | % | | 6.79% | | 14% | Ratio of Noninterest Expense before Acquisition, OREO and FDIC Clawback Liability Expenses to Average Assets (%)* | | | 3.35 | % | | | 2.99 | % | | | 2.45 | % | | | 15 | % | | 2.96% | | 15% | Ratio of Non-Performing Assets to period end Total Loans & OREO | | | 1.40 | % | | | 1.10 | % | | | 0.95 | % | | | 15 | % | | 0.60% | | 23% | Individual Performance | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 15 | % | | ** | | 15-17% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | | 122%-124%
of Target |
| | Performance Goals | Weighting | 2018 Actual | % Achieved | | | Threshold (50% of Target) | Target (100% of Target) | Stretch (150% of Target) | Core Pretax Return on
Average Assets (%)* | 1.48% | 1.64% | 1.80% | 30% | 1.73% | 128.13% | | Core Pretax Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (%)* | 16.61% | 18.61% | 20.61% | 25% | 20.21% | 140.00% | Ratio of Operating Noninterest Expense to Average Assets (%)* | 2.81% | 2.61% | 2.41% | 15% | 2.60% | 102.50% | | Ratio of Average Non-Performing Assets to period end Total Loans, OREO and OPPO (%)* | 1.00% | 0.75% | 0.50% | 15% | 0.88% | 74.00% | | Individual Performance | N/A | N/A | N/A | 15% | ** | 100% | | Total: | 115% of Target |
* | Core returnpretax returns on average assets and average tangible equity, the ratio of operating noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses to average assets, and the ratio of average nonperforming assets to period end total loans, Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) and Other Personal Property Owned (OPPO) are non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information regarding how these performance measures are calculated from the Company’s audited financial statements. |
| ** | The individual performance results for each Named Executive are discussed below. |
A larger weighting was assigned to the core return on average assets metric because the Committee determined that the 2015 short term incentive program should emphasize an earnings-related goal. For the individual performance metrics, the
The Committee established and approved individual performance factors for the CEO,Chief Executive Officer, and the CEO didChief Executive Officer established the sameindividual performance factors for the other Named Executives, which factors are discussed in more detail below. Performance below the “threshold” level results in no payout earned for the applicable performance goal. If performance falls between the “threshold” and “target” or “target” and “stretch” levels, then the earned payout is determined using straight line interpolation. Once earned annual incentive awards arewere calculated based on actual performance as compared to the goals set forth above, the Committee hashad the discretion to reduce or increase the payouts to the extent it determinesdetermined appropriate to reflect the business environment and market conditions that may affect Columbia’s financial and stock price performance. Based in part on the recommendations of the CEO,Chief Executive Officer, the Committee approvesapproved the final annual incentive award payouts to the Named Executives other than Ms. Dressel.the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee approvesapproved and recommendsrecommended to the Board for approval the final annual incentive award payout to Ms. Dressel.the Chief Executive Officer. The table above shows the Company performance in 20152018 for each of the four Company performance metrics, as well as the resulting weighted achievement percentage earned as a result of 20152018 performance. For the individual performance component, the CommitteeCompany considered the following achievements for each Named Executive with respect to his or her individual performance factors. For Ms. Dressel,Mr. Robbins, who iswas responsible for leading the performance of the Company as a whole, the Committee considered the financial results described in the table above, as well as Ms. Dressel’s successful executionadvancement of the Company’sbank’s digital technology and change management road map initiative, the design and launch of our cultural rebranding program along with building out a scalable risk management organization to optimize long-term shareholder value while supporting employees, clients and communities. For Mr. Sigrist, the Company considered establishing an effective leadership presence within the executive leadership team and organizational-wide leaders as a strategic planbusiness partner along with maintaining stability within the accounting and finance departments following the transition in 2015.leadership from the prior Chief Financial Officer. For Mr. Stein, the CommitteeCompany considered his successful implementationreorganization of forecasting tools priorthe commercial leadership to scale and align with the 2016 budget process, includingCompany’s Retail organizational structure and the integrationreorganization of a rolling short term forecastInformation Technology, Banking Solutions and Operations into the annual planning process, which added efficiencies toInnovation and Technology group. Additionally, the Company’s budgeting efforts,Company considered Mr. Stein’s dual Chief Financial Officer and utilizationChief Operating Officer roles for the first five months of 2018 and his transition of the long term forecast in the development of strategic plan financial targets.Chief Financial Officer role to Mr. Sigrist. For Mr. Lawson, the CommitteeCompany considered his successfulexecution of expanded talent and leadership development programs, actionable succession plans for critical roles and charter development and implementation of an integrated approachapproval to talentdeploy a new human capital management and succession planning, including his establishment of a Columbia Bank talent review process and framework and creation of a leadership effectiveness program.workforce solution in 2019. For Mr. McDonald, the Committee considered the Company’s improved loan fulfillment process, including the reduced loan production time, improved quality control and streamlined processes within the loan operations area. For Mr. Robbins, theCommitteeCompany considered his active role in the current expected credit losses (CECL) project and collaboration with the Finance team along with his work in integrating and stabilizing the former Pacific Continental Bank credit administration team. For Ms. Baruffi, the Company considered her successful implementation of a sustainable organization structure that supports the Company’s ability to achieve short-corporate governance objectives and long-term performance goals.continued achievement of in-house legal support initiatives. After considering each Named Executive’s performance in 2015,2018, the Committee approved the achievement of the individual performance component at 100% of the target level for each of Ms. Dressel and Messrs. Lawson, McDonald and Robbins, and at 110% of the target level for Mr. Stein.
Named Executive. Based on these 20152018 Company and individual performance results, the Committee approved annual incentive awards to the Named Executives for 20152018 as follows: | | | | | | | | | Named Executive | | Target
Annual
Incentive | | | Earned
Annual
Incentive | | Melanie J. Dressel | | $ | 367,500 | | | $ | 448,928 | | Clint E. Stein | | $ | 140,000 | | | $ | 173,120 | | David C. Lawson | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 122,157 | | Andrew L. McDonald | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | 146,589 | | Hadley S. Robbins | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 183,236 | |
| Named Executive | | Target
Annual Incentive | | | Earned
Annual Incentive | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | $ | 438,000 | | | $ | 503,317 | | | Gregory A. Sigrist | | | 87,500 | * | | | 100,548 | | | Clint E. Stein | | | 213,500 | | | | 245,338 | | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | 134,400 | | | | 154,442 | | | David C. Lawson | | | 116,000 | | | | 133,299 | | | Kumi Y. Baruffi | | | 116,000 | | | | 133,299 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| * Mr. Sigrist’s target and earned incentive for 2018 were prorated to reflect his period of employment with the Company in 2018. |
In addition to his annual bonus opportunity for 2018, Mr. Sigrist, was paid a one-time signing and relocation bonus of $100,000 in connection with the commencement of his employment. Mr. Sigrist is required to repay a portion of this one-time bonus if his employment is terminated for cause or if Mr. Sigrist resigns before completing two years of service to the Company. The portion that must be repaid is determined on a straight-line basis over the two-year period.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation Columbia believes executive officers and other key management positions should have a meaningful portion of their competitive total compensation opportunity linked to shareholder return, which is directly tied to our long-term vision of growth, stability, asset quality and our commitment to a personalized banking approach. Long-term incentives take the form of equity awards that are intended to align the interests of the executive with those of our shareholders by encouraging ownership of our common stock and tying value to the long-term market value of the Company’s stock. These awards also serve to promote an executive’s continued service to the organization by vesting over a period of years and encourage sound risk management by providing a balanced view of performance and aligning awards with the longer-term time horizon of risk outcomes. In accordance with the LTI Plan
Since 2014, our long-term incentive compensation has consisted of a combination of performance-based restricted stock awards (“Performance Shares”) that the Committee implementedare earned over a three-year performance period and time-based restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), in 2014each case issued under the Company’s 2014 Stock Option & Equity Compensation Plan (the “2014 Plan”) or the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), 2015 long-term incentive opportunities included a combinationwhich was approved by our shareholders at our 2018 Annual Meeting. Grant of performance-based restricted stock awards (“Performance Shares”) and time-based restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”) that were issued under the 2014 Plan.20152018 Long-Term Incentive Awards Time Horizon
In 2015,2018, we granted our Named Executives Performance Shares that are earned and vest at the end of a 3-yearthree-year performance period based on achieving relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) compared to the KBW Regional Banking Index (KRX) and our return on average assets (“ROAA”) against targets established by the Committee. After the end of the performance period, the Committee will assess performance against the goals and determine the amount, if any, of earned Performance Shares. We also granted our Named Executives Restricted Stock awards that vest over four years, 20% on the second anniversary of grant, 30% on the third anniversary, and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary subject to continued service.
service2015 Performance. Performance Measures of for 2018 Performance Shares For 2015,2018, Performance Shares are earned and vest based on achievement of the following performance goals for the period from January 1, 20152018 through December 31, 2017,2020, as established by the Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Performance Goals | Performance Measure | | Weighting | | | Measurement Perspective | | Threshold | | Target | | Stretch | | | | | | | Return on Average Assets (“ROAA”) | | | 50 | % | | Columbia | | 0.85% | | 1.00% | | 1.25% | | | | | | | Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) | | | 50% | | | Relative to KBW Regional
Banking Index (KRX) | | 30th Percentile | | 50th Percentile | | 80th Percentile | | | | | | | Payout as % of Target | | | | | | | | 50% | | 100% | | 150% |
| Performance Measure | Weighting | Measurement Perspective | Performance Goals | | Threshold | Target | Stretch | Return on Average Assets
(“ROAA”) | 50% | Relative to KBW Regional Banking Index (KRX) | 30th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 80th Percentile | Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) | 50% | Relative to KBW Regional Banking Index (KRX) | 30th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 80th Percentile | | Payout as % of Target | | | 50% | 100% | 150% |
The performance measures are calculated as follows: | •● | | ROAA: Average of the Company’s ROAA for the 12 calendar quarters between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, with(with each calendar quarter calculated separately,separately) measured on a relative basis against oura defined group of peer banks over the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. The Committee determined to measure the Company’s average ROAA relative to peers, rather than to measure the ROAA relative to absolute performance goals, shown above.based on the Committee’s advice from Pearl Meyer regarding market practices. |
| •● | | TSR: Measured on a relative basis against a defined group of peer banks over the period January 1, 20152018 through December 31, 20172020 (calculated assuming that dividends during the period are reinvested in company shares on the date paid). For this purpose, peer banks will consist of all companies included in the KBW Regional Banking Index (KRX) as of December 31, 2017. |
For purposes of the performance measures, the peer banks will consist of all companies included in the KBW Regional Banking Index as of December 31, 2020. Payout Determination for Performance Shares At the end of the performance period, the Committee will review the Company’s actual performance and determine the number of earned awards. Performance below “threshold” for a given performance measure will result in forfeiture of the respective shares; performance at or above “stretch” for a given performance measure will result in payout equal to 150% of the respective target shares. Performance between threshold and target and target and stretch will be determined using straight line interpolation and rounded up to the nearest whole number of shares. All financial performance determinations for the Company and the peer banks will be made at the ultimate parent company level. Dividends earned on Performance Shares will accrue, but will not be paid until vesting is determinable and will only be paid on those shares earned and released from restriction. 2015
2018 Target Long-Term Equity Incentive Award Opportunities The target long-term equity incentive award opportunities granted in early 2018 represented (or, for 2015 represented,Mr. Sigrist, in June 2018 in connection with his appointment), in the aggregate, approximately 50%90% of base salary for Ms. Dressel and 40%Mr. Robbins, approximately 65% of base salary for theMr. Stein and approximately 55% of base salary for our other Named Executives. Accordingly,Mr. Robbins’ total long-term incentive opportunity was granted 25% in the form of restricted stock and 75% in the form of Performance Shares, in order to increase the proportion of his total compensation opportunity that is tied to the achievement of objective performance criteria in light of his role as Chief Executive Officer. For each of our other Named Executives, receivedapproximately 50% of the following numbertotal target opportunity was granted in the form of sharesrestricted stock and 50% in 2015. the form of Performance Shares. Equity award values are based on the closing market price of our stock on the date the Board approves the grant. | | | | | | | | | Named Executive | | Target Performance Shares
(Performance-Based Vesting) | | | Restricted Stock
(Time-Based Vesting) | | Melanie J. Dressel | | | 9,723 | | | | 3,241 | | | | | Clint E. Stein | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,470 | | | | | David C. Lawson | | | 1,764 | | | | 1,764 | | | | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | 2,117 | | | | 2,117 | | | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | 2,646 | | | | 2,646 | |
| Current Named Executive | Target Performance Shares (Performance-Based Vesting) | Restricted Stock
(Time-Based Vesting) | | Hadley S. Robbins | 11,790 | 3,936 | | Gregory A. Sigrist | 2,360 | 2,370 | | Clint E. Stein | 3,320 | 3,324 | | Andrew L. McDonald | 2,210 | 2,214 | | David C. Lawson | 1,900 | 1,918 | | Kumi Y. Baruffi | 1,900 | 1,918 |
In establishing award levels, the Committee views each grant of an equity award to an executive as a separate incentive intended to drive future shareholder return and to promote retention. In determining the value of equity awards to executives, the Committee also considers comparisons to our peer group. Additionally, the Committee also considers awards to executives compared to the level of equity awards offered to other Company employees.
2016 Performance Share Award Payout The Performance Shares granted in 2016 were subject to performance vesting conditions tied to the Company’s ROAA and TSR relative to a defined group of peer banks, in each case over the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018. In February 2019, the Committee reviewed the Company’s actual performance against the ROAA and TSR targets and determined that the awards would pay out at 128% of target. A summary of the Company’s performance as measured against the goals, and the resulting payout, is set forth below: | Performance Measure | Weighting | Measurement Perspective | Performance Goals | Results | | Threshold (50% Payout) | Target (100% Payout) | Stretch (150% Payout) | Actual Performance | Percent of Target Payout | | ROAA | 50% | Columbia | 0.85% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 142% | | TSR | 50% | Relative to
KRX | 30th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 80th Percentile | 58th Percentile | 113% | | | | | | | | Total: | 128% |
We believe that a retirement plan for our Named Executives is an important part of the total compensation package and provides a mechanism for attracting and retaining superior executives. We have not adopted a formal pension plan but, instead, have historically provided retirement benefits through a retirement plan that provides lifetime benefits (also known as a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or “SERP”), a long-term compensation plan (also known as a “Unit Plan”) and an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2013, the Unit Plans for the Named Executives were frozen and supplemented by SERPs. Both programs are described in greater detail below under “ Compensation Tables—Pension Benefits.” In 2001, the Company implemented a SERP for certain executive officers to provide retirement benefits to those officers. The SERP provides a lifetime annual retirement benefit, the amount of which declines to the extent the executive retires before a specified retirement age. The SERPs serve a retention purpose by vesting over a period of time and by restricting the executive from working for a competitor for a period following termination of employment. Starting in 2004, the Company began using supplemental compensation arrangements, which we called Unit Plans, to provide retirement benefits for executive officers instead of SERPs. Between 2004 and 2012, we awarded three separate Unit Plans to Mr. McDonald and a Unit Plan to Mr. Stein. In 2013, the Committee approved offering SERPs to replace the Named Executives’ Unit Plans. Accordingly, the Company entered into SERPs with Messrs. McDonald and Stein, and their respective Unit Plans were frozen at the then-current benefit amounts. The SERPs for Messrs. McDonald and Steinwhich provide that amounts drawn under their SERPs will be reduced by the amount that is attributable to each respective Unit Plan. This approach provides these executives with a retirement benefit that is consistent with Columbia’s compensation philosophy, while optimally leveraging the expense already incurred in funding the Unit Plans. In 2013, following the acquisition of West Coast Bancorp, the Company assumed the SERP that was provided to Mr. Robbins as an executive of West Coast Bancorp; the Company also entered into a SERP with Mr. Lawson in 2013.2013 and Ms. Baruffi in 2015. A more detailed description regarding payments under the SERPs and Unit Plans is set forth below under “Compensation“Compensation Tables—Post Employment and Termination Benefits.Benefits.” As more fully described below under “Compensation“Compensation Tables—Post Employment and Termination Benefits,” we also provide non-employee directors and highly-compensated employees (as defined by IRS rules) with the opportunity to defer compensation through antwo Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.Plans. The participation in our 401(k) Planplan for these individuals is limited under federal income tax rules, and we believe they should have other similar means of saving for retirement. Currently, interest paid on the participant deferrals is three-month LIBOR (the “London Interbank Offered Rate”) plus 3.58%. Executive Employment and Change-in-Control Agreements We provide severance and change-in-control benefits to executives that are payable in circumstances the Committee believes are appropriate and market-competitive. Change-in-control benefits are generally “double-trigger,” meaning they are payable only if the executive experiences a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change-in-control of the Company. Ms. DresselEmployment Agreement with Mr. Robbins. Mr. Robbins serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Columbia and Columbia Bank pursuant to an employment agreement entered into effective AugustJuly 1, 2004,2017, which is described in detail in the section entitled “Compensation“Compensation Tables—Post Employment and Termination Benefits”Benefits” below. We believe that an employment agreement with our President and Chief Executive Officer helps protect the interests of our shareholders in a number of meaningful ways. It guarantees continuity of leadership through retention and through severance and change-in-control provisions itand reduces potential concerns from shareholders about the degree to which the Chief Executive Officer is affected by short-term prospects for continued employment when making key strategic, long-term decisions.
In general, upon a qualifying termination, Ms. Dressel is entitledMr. Robbins’ agreement entitles him to receive any earned but unpaid bonus for a prior fiscal year, cash severance equal to two times Mr. Robbins’ annual base salary, and benefitsa prorated bonus for the greateryear of two years or the balance of the term of her agreement,termination based on actual performance, a prorated portion of any long-term incentive payment earned duringawards (based on actual performance in the yearcase of termination,awards subject to performance-based vesting) and all forfeiture provisions regarding any outstanding restricted stock or other compensation agreements will lapse. continued health and welfare benefits for twenty-four months. Upon a qualifying termination related to a change-in-control, Ms. Dressel is entitledMr. Robbins’ agreement entitles him to change-in-control payments consistingreceive any earned but unpaid bonus for a prior fiscal year, cash severance equal to two and a half times the sum of a monthly payment ofMr. Robbins’ annual base salary and target annual bonus, a prorated target bonus for the year of termination and continued health and welfare benefits for the greater ofthirty months. Mr. Robbins is subject to customary restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation covenants, during his employment and for two years or the balancefollowing termination of the term of her agreement, an amount equal to two timesemployment for any incentive payment earned during the year preceding termination and accelerated vesting of options and lapse of restrictions on restricted stock awards; provided, that any change-in-control payments may be reduced by payments paid previously upon a qualifying termination.reason. Change-in-Control Agreements with Other Named Executives. The Company has entered into change-in-control agreements with each of the current Named Executives, other than Ms. Dressel, which are described in more detail below under “Compensation“Compensation Tables—Post Employment and Termination Benefits.Benefits.” Mr. Robbins’ change-in-control agreement was superseded by his employment agreement effective as of July 1, 2017. The change-in-control agreements contain provisions, similar to those in Ms. Dressel’sMr. Robbins’ employment agreement, that require payments in the event of termination of employment related to a change-in-control. These arrangements are “double trigger,” meaning that they provide payments only upon a covered termination of employment in connection with a change-in-control, and no covered executive will receive payments under the agreements due to a change-in-control alone. In general, upon a qualifying termination related to a change-in-control, an executive with a change-in-control agreement will be entitled to two years’ annual base salary paid monthly over two years, accelerated vesting of any options and lapse of restrictions on restricted stock awards and will be subject to two-year non-compete and non-solicit covenants. Additionally, as discussed under “Compensation Tables—Post-Employment and Termination BenefitsIn connection with” below, unvested Shares will vest in full as of the West Coast Bancorp acquisition, in 2013, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Robbins that provides fordate of the closing of a cash retention award of $554,365 that vested in two equal installments in each of April 2014 and 2015, subject to his continued employmentchange-in-control transaction (for Performance Shares, based on the vesting date.greater of target or actual performance) unless the Shares are replaced or assumed, in which case the Shares will continue as replaced or assumed.
Retirement Vesting of Earned Performance Awards. In the event that a Named Executive’s employment terminates (other than for “cause”) at a time when the Named Executive is at least age 62 with at least five years of service, the Named Executive will remain eligible to earn a prorated portion of any outstanding Performance Shares based on actual performance. The vested amount was credited to his Executive Deferred Compensation Plan account and is payable in a lump sum upon his separation from service. In order to align with the compensation arrangements of our other Named Executives, in 2014, we replaced Mr. Robbins’ employment agreement with our standard change-in-control agreement for executives as described above, with Mr. Robbins continuing toprorated portion will be entitled to his retention awarddetermined based on the same terms.portion of the performance period in which the Named Executive was employed. As of December 31, 2018, only Messrs. Robbins and McDonald met the definition of retirement applicable to the Performance Shares. Perquisites and General Employee Benefits As with all of our employees, we strive to assist our executives in meeting their retirement income, health care, disability income, time off and other needs through competitive, cost-effective, Company-sponsored programs that provide individuals with reasonable flexibility in the context of their individual circumstances, and the Named Executives participate in these and other benefits to the same extent as other employees. These benefits include medical and dental insurance, disability insurance, and the Company’s 401(k) Plan.plan. The Named Executives do not receive any perquisites or similar benefits such as Company-provided cars, car allowances, or country club memberships. As described in the Summary Compensation Table on page 33, Mr. Robbins did receive certain perquisites during 2015 in connection with Columbia’s acquisition of West Coast Bancorp. These perquisites have been discontinued and are no longer provided.Clawback PolicyPolicies for the Recovery of Incentive Compensation We have adopted a policy
Our annual and long-term incentive compensation programs provide for the recovery of incentive compensation under certain circumstances. Under this policy,these programs, the Company will recover incentive compensation awarded to current or former executive officers (during the preceding three years) if the Company restates its financial results due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws (a “restatement”), to the extent the original awards exceeded the amounts that would have been paid under the restated results. In June 2017, the Committee approved, and in July 2017, the Board adopted, a new Clawback Policy that covers current and former executive officers of the Company and applies to all incentive compensation granted following the date of adoption. The Clawback Policy provides that, to the full extent permitted by law, the Committee may require the forfeiture and/or repayment of unpaid incentive compensation (whether vested or unvested) and incentive compensation paid in the preceding three-year period (but not prior to July 2017) if a “triggering event” occurs. For purposes of the Clawback Policy, a “triggering event” is any of the following events: (1) the Company is required to prepare a restatement, (2) the executive engages in conduct that causes material financial or reputational harm to the Company or its business activities, (3) the grant or payment of incentive compensation was based on materially inaccurate performance metrics or a material misrepresentation by the executive, (4) the executive improperly or with gross negligence failed to identify, raise or assess, in a timely manner, risks material to the Company or its business activities or (5) the executive engages in a fraudulent act or knowing and willful misconduct or violates restrictive covenants or employment restrictions to which the executive is subject. Stock Ownership Guidelines;Guidelines and No-Hedging The Company has
Stock Ownership Guidelines In March 2017, the Board adopted a Stock Ownership Policy, which replaced our prior stock ownership guidelines for its executive officers.effective as of January 1, 2017. The guidelines are intendedStock Ownership Policy requires each Named Executive to help closely align the financial interestsown shares equal in value to a multiple of these officers with those of our shareholders. Officers are expected to make continuing progress towards compliance with the guidelines during a five-year period from his or her appointmentannual base salary rather than a fixed number of shares, as an executive officer.Thewas required under the prior stock ownership guidelines as applied toguidelines. For the Named Executives are as follows: (1)Chief Executive Officer, the CEO and Chief Operating Officer each have a required minimum ownership of approximately 28,000 shares; and (2)multiple is three; for Executive Vice Presidents, which include the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Credit Officer, and Chief Human Resources Officer, each haveand General Counsel, the multiple is two. The Stock Ownership Policy also requires non-employee directors to own shares equal in value to five times the annual Board cash retainer. The share value is based on the average closing price of Company’s common stock over the 200 trading days preceding December 31 of the applicable calendar year.
The Named Executives and non-employee directors may satisfy the ownership requirements in the Stock Ownership Policy with common stock owned directly or indirectly (if the participant has a required minimum ownershippecuniary interest in the shares), vested stock-based awards (other than options) and unvested restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards that are subject to time-based vesting requirements. If a participant is not in compliance with the Stock Ownership Policy as of 21,000 shares. December 31 of any year, he or she must retain all of the shares held as of that date and all shares acquired in the following year (including any shares granted to the participant pursuant to an equity award or acquired on exercise of an option), other than any shares withheld to pay an option exercise price or tax obligations. At year-end 2015, Ms. Dressel and Mr. McDonald had exceeded2018, each Named Executive satisfied the required minimum. Mr. Stein, who was promoted to Chief Financial Officer in August 2012, Mr. Lawson, who was appointed to the role of Chief Human Resources Officer in July of 2013, andnew Stock Ownership Policy requirements other than Mr. Robbins, who joined the Company in 2013 following its acquisition of West Coast Bancorp and whose salary was appointed to the role ofincreased in connection with his appointment as our Chief OperatingExecutive Officer in March 2014 are all expected2017; and Mr. Sigrist, who joined the Company in June, 2018. Accordingly, Mr. Robbins and Mr. Sigrist will be required to meetretain the five-year target date for compliance specifiedshares that each held as of December 31, 2018 and any shares acquired in the guidelines.2019, except as described above. No-Hedging The Company has also adopted insider-trading policies that prohibit directors, executive officers and certain other individuals from (1) trading in any put, call, short sale or other derivative securities relating to the Company’s securities and (2) engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to any of the Company’s securities. Impact of Tax Treatment of Compensation The Committee and management have consideredconsider the accounting and tax impacts of various programs designed to balance the potential cost to the Company with the benefit/value to the executive. Section 162(m) of the Code generally prohibits publicly held companies from deducting compensation paid to a Named Executive that exceeds $1 million during the tax year. Prior to the adoption of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which was enacted on December 22, 2017, to the extent that compensation was based upon the attainment of performance goals set by the Committee pursuant to plans approved by our shareholders, the compensation generally was not included in the $1 million limit. The Tax Act repealed this exemption, and, as a result, compensation paid to Named Executive in excess of $1 million will no longer be deductible, even if performance-based, other than with respect to certain arrangements in place on November 2, 2017. The Committee generally seekscontinues to maximizeconsider the deductibility of compensation, including in light of the changes to Section 162(m); however, the primary goals of our executive compensation under Section 162(m) while retaining discretionprograms are to compensate executives in a manner commensurateattract, incentivize and retain key employees and align pay with performanceindividual and business performance. The Committee retains the competitive market for executive talent. In this context, the Committee acts in a mannerability to pay compensation that in its judgment, is in the best interests of the Company. In 2014, we adopted and our shareholders approved the 2014 Plan, which allows for the grant of awards that qualifyexceeds deductibility limits as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).it determines. CCompensationompensation Tables The following table shows compensation paid or accrued in the years shown for Columbia’s Named Executives. As required by SEC rules, Columbia’s Named Executives include Columbia’s Chief Executive Officer,Officer; Mr. Stein, who served as the Chief Financial Officer for a portion of 2018 and each ofMr. Sigrist who served as Chief Financial Officer beginning on June 4, 2018; and the three other Named Executives. 2015 Summary Compensation Tablemost highly paid executive officers.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2018 Summary Compensation Table | | Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary
($)
(1) | | Bonus
($)
(2) | | Stock
Awards
($)
(3)(4) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(5) | | Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(6) | | All Other
Compensation
($)
(7) | | Total
($) | | | Year
| | Salary
($)
(1)
| | | Bonus
($)(2)
| | | Stock
Awards
($)
(3)(4)
| | | | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (5)
| | | Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
Qualified
Deferred Compensation
Earnings
($)
(6)
| | | All Other
Compensation
($)
(7)
| | | Total
($)
| | | Melanie J Dressel | | | 2015 | | | $ | 729,167 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 534,975 | | | $ | 448,928 | | | $ | 3,408,038 | | | $ | 38,654 | | | $ | 5,159,762 | | | President, Chief Executive Officer | | | 2014 | | | | 675,000 | | | | 437,500 | | | | 212,170 | | | | — | | | | 368,317 | | | | 27,841 | | | | 1,720,828 | | | | | | 2013 | | | | 490,332 | | | | 350,000 | | | | 149,025 | | | | — | | | | 340,764 | | | | 20,496 | | | | 1,350,617 | | | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | 2018 | | | 724,231 | | | | — | | | | 866,297 | | | | — | | | | 503,317 | | | | 252,367 | | | | 55,774 | | | | 2,401,986 | | | President, Chief | | | 2017 | | | 538,616 | | | | — | | | | 919,666 | | | | — | | | | 441,593 | | | | 1,561,485 | | | | 39,770 | | | | 3,501,130 | | | Executive Officer | | | 2016 | | | 374,000 | | | | — | | | | 222,319 | | | | — | | | | 162,630 | | | | 166,147 | | | | 41,772 | | | | 966,868 | | Gregory A. Sigrist
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (7)
| | | 2018 | | | 187,500 | | | | 100,000 | | | | 229,875 | | | | — | | | | 100,548 | | | | 77,081 | | | | 18,010 | | | | 713,014 | | Clint E. Stein | | | 2015 | | | | 345,000 | | | | — | | | | 182,582 | | | | 173,120 | | | | 506,955 | | | | 40,261 | | | | 1,247,918 | | | 2018 | | | 423,077 | | | | — | | | | 336,458 | | | | — | | | | 245,338 | | | | 37,224 | | | | 45,704 | | | | 1,087,801 | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | | 2014 | | | | 308,333 | | | | 160,000 | | | | 105,190 | | | | — | | | | 124,110 | | | | 41,401 | | | | 739,034 | | | | | | 2013 | | | | 218,667 | | | | 120,000 | | | | 59,610 | | | | — | | | | 95,851 | | | | 39,375 | | | | 533,503 | | | | | Executive Vice President, Chief | | | 2017 | | | 385,300 | | | | — | | | | 623,572 | | | | — | | | | 220,541 | | | | 278,731 | | | | 41,671 | | | | 1,549,815 | | | Operating Officer (7) | | | 2016 | | | 349,865 | | | | — | | | | 208,068 | | | | — | | | | 152,205 | | | | 148,412 | | | | 40,996 | | | | 899,546 | | David C. Lawson | | | 2015 | | | | 247,500 | | | | — | | | | 130,395 | | | | 122,157 | | | | 129,182 | | | | 31,980 | | | | 661,214 | | | 2018 | | | 287,308 | | | | — | | | | 193,208 | | | | — | | | | 133,299 | | | | 130,068 | | | | 32,004 | | | | 775,887 | | Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer | | | 2014 | | | | 233,333 | | | | 117,500 | | | | 105,190 | | | | — | | | | 78,259 | | | | 25,862 | | | | 560,144 | | | | | Executive Vice President, | | | 2017 | | | 273,885 | | | | — | | | | 157,545 | | | | — | | | | 148,047 | | | | 197,959 | | | | 30,064 | | | | 807,500 | | Chief Human Resources Officer
| | | 2016 | | | 253,327 | | | | — | | | | 151,123 | | | | — | | | | 110,505 | | | | 130,978 | | | | 31,124 | | | | 677,057 | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | 2015 | | | | 298,000 | | | | — | | | | 156,504 | | | | 146,589 | | | | 831,885 | | | | 45,811 | | | | 1,478,789 | | | 2018 | | | 333,500 | | | | — | | | | 224,222 | | | | — | | | | 154,442 | | | | 88,445 | | | | 55,780 | | | | 856,389 | | Executive Vice President, Chief | | | 2014 | | | | 281,667 | | | | 115,200 | | | | 105,190 | | | | — | | | | 375,238 | | | | 54,856 | | | | 932,151 | | | 2017 | | | 320,500 | | | | — | | | | 184,336 | | | | — | | | | 173,258 | | | | 286,740 | | | | 50,595 | | | | 1,015,429 | | Credit Officer | | | 2013 | | | | 224,545 | | | | 120,000 | | | | 59,610 | | | | — | | | | 132,164 | | | | 96,199 | | | | 632,518 | | | 2016 | | | 297,603 | | | | — | | | | 176,821 | | | | — | | | | 129,270 | | | | 206,825 | | | | 48,202 | | | | 858,721 | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | 2015 | | | | 369,827 | | | | 277,182 | | | | 195,592 | | | | 183,236 | | | | 64,200 | | | | 78,469 | | | | 1,168,506 | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | | | 2014 | | | | 318,923 | | | | 449,163 | | | | 105,190 | | | | — | | | | 450 | | | | 75,753 | | | | 949,479 | | | Kumi Y. Baruffi | | | 2018 | | | 283,269 | | | | — | | | | 193,208 | | | | — | | | | 133,299 | | | | 121,333 | | | | 28,950 | | | | 760,059 | | Executive Vice President, General Counsel | | | 2017 | | | 253,077 | | | | — | | | | 145,558 | | | | — | | | | 136,783 | | | | 141,430 | | | | 27,019 | | | | 703,867 | |
| (1) | Amounts include discretionary contributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: Ms. Dressel $48,000, Mr. Stein $33,600,$46,081, Mr. Lawson $21,750$22,605, and Mr. Robbins $158,863.Ms. Baruffi $10,400. The material terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan are described under “Post-Employment and Termination Benefits—Deferred Compensation Plan.” The 2014 salary reported for Mr. McDonald in the Summary Compensation Table in the Company’s 2015 proxy statement was overstated by $26,666. This amount has been corrected in the Summary Compensation Table above.
|
| | | (2) | For Mr. Robbins, for 2015Sigrist, reflects $277,182 representinga one-time signing and relocation bonus paid in connection with the second installmentcommencement of his $554,365 cash retention award,employment, a portion of which was, in accordance with its terms, made asMr. Sigrist will be required to repay if his employment is terminated for cause or he resigns within two years following his start date of June 4, 2018. The portion that must be repaid is determined on a discretionary contribution to his Deferred Compensation Plan Account (“DCA”) in April 2015 and, for 2014, includes $277,183 representingstraight-line basis over the first installment of his cash retention award, which was, in accordance with its terms, made as a discretionary contribution to his DCA in 2014.two-year period. |
| (3) | For 2015, includes2018, amounts shown for the NEOs other than Mr. Sigrist include the grant date fair value of Restricted Stock awards granted on March 25, 2015February 28, 2018, that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% of which vestvesting on March 25, 2019February 28, 2022 and the grant date fair value of Performance Shares granted on March 25, 201528, 2018 for the period commencing January 1, 20152018 and ending December 31, 2017 (the 2015-2017 performance period).2020. For Mr. Sigrist, amounts shown include the grant date fair value of Restricted Stock awards granted on June 4, 2018 that vest 20% on February 28, 2020, 30% on February 26, 2021 and the remaining 50% vesting on February 28, 2022 and the grant date fair value of Performance Shares granted on June 28, 2018 for the period commencing January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2020. At stretch performance, the Performance Shares grant date fair value would be $428,289$701,851 for Ms. Dressel, $108,797Mr. Robbins, $126,520 for Mr. Sigrist, $197,582 for Mr. Stein, $77,700$113,074 for Mr. Lawson, $93,263$131,721 for Mr. McDonald, and $116,550$113,074 for Mr. Robbins.Ms. Baruffi. |
For 2014, includes2017, amounts shown include the grant date fair value of (a) Restricted Stock awards granted on February 22, 2017 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of grant date and the remaining 50% vesting on February 22, 2021, (b) in the case of Messrs. Robbins and Stein, Restricted Stock awards granted on April 26, 2017 that vest on April 26, 2019, (c) in the case of Mr. Robbins, Restricted Stock awards granted on July 3, 2017 that vest on the same schedule as the Restricted Stock awards granted on February 22, 2017 and (d) the grant date fair value of Performance Shares granted on February 22, 2017 and, in the case of Mr. Robbins, July 3, 2017 for the period commencing January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2019 (the 2017-2019 performance period). At stretch performance, the Performance Shares grant date fair value would be $389,547 for Mr. Robbins, $129,258 for Mr. Stein, $94,006 for Mr. Lawson, $109,844 for Mr. McDonald, and $86,853 for Ms. Baruffi. For 2016, amounts shown include the grant date fair value of Restricted Stock awards granted on February 26, 201424, 2016 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% of which vest on February 26, 201824, 2020 and the grant date fair value of Performance Shares granted on AprilMarch 23, 20142016 for the period commencing AprilJanuary 1, 20142016 and ending December 31, 20162018 (the 2014-20162016-2018 performance period). At stretch performance, the Performance Shares grant date fair value would be $240,705$135,571 for Ms. Dressel, $80,235Mr. Robbins, $126,891 for Mr. Stein, $80,235$92,171 for Mr. Lawson, $80,235and $107,878 for Mr. McDonald and $80,235 for Mr. Robbins. For 2013, includes the grant date fair value of Restricted Stock awards that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary and the remaining 50% of which vest on the fourth anniversary on February 27, 2017.McDonald.
| (4) | The grant date fair value of stock awards was determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Assumptions used to calculate these amounts are set forth in footnote 34 to “20152018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” and in Note 22 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended 2015,2018, included in the Company’s 20152018 Annual Report. The fair market value of Restricted Stock awards granted in 20152018 was based on the closing price of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on the grant date, February 28, 2018 ($41.78 per share) and June 4, 2018 ($43.61 per share). The fair market value of 50% of the Performance Shares was based on the closing price of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on the grant date March 25, 201528, 2018 ($28.3542.01 per share). and June 28, 2018 ($41.38 per share) and 50% on a fair value calculation using a Monte-Carlo simulation ($37.34 per share) and ($30.10 per share), respectively. |
The fair market value of 50% of the Performance Shares was based on the closing price of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on the grant date, March 25, 2015 ($28.35 per share) and 50% on a fair value calculation using a Monte-Carlo simulation ($30.38 per share).
| (5) | The amounts in this column reflect the annual incentive awards earned under the 2014 Stock Option & Equity Compensation Plan for 20152018 performance. |
| (6) | The amounts in this column do not represent amounts actually paid to a Named Executive. Includes the change in actuarial present value of the accumulated projected benefit under the SERP, which is a non-cash amount that can vary significantly from year-to-year based upon assumptions underlying the actuarial calculationscalculations. Assumptions such as discount rate and for 2015, reflectsretirement age are reviewed annually by the impact of amendmentsCompany and are intended to thebe individually appropriate. The SERP formula described below.is discussed in further detail under “Post Employment and Termination Benefits—Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.” |
Assumptions such as discount rate and retirement age are reviewed annually by the Company and are intended to be individually appropriate.
The SERP is designed to provide lifetime retirement benefits equal to 60%For 2018, amounts shown include: for Mr. Robbins $229,538 of the average of the three highest years of base salary (which we refer to as the “SERP formula”), with an annual two percent cost of living adjustment to benefit payments. Prior to 2015, the SERP benefits were calculated based on a fixed dollar amount. In 2015, in order to better account for fluctuations in the participant’s base salary over time, the Company amended the SERP to provide that the SERP benefit available to each participant would instead equal the SERP formula described above. This change contributed to an increase in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which is reflected in this column, but does not represent any cash compensation paid to the Named Executives in 2015. The SERP is discussed in further detail under “PostEmployment and Termination Benefits—Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.”
Amount shown (the “SERP”), which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $22,829 of above-market earnings on his DCA; for Ms. DresselMr. Sigrist includes $3,404,679$77,081 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, and $3,359 of above-market earnings on her DCA.
Amount shownwhich he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested; for Mr. Stein includes $502,020$30,100 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $4,935$7,124 of above-market earnings on his DCA.
Amount shownDCA; for Mr. Lawson includes $128,795$127,188 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $387$2,880 of above-market earnings on his DCA.
Amount shownDCA; for Mr. McDonald includes $830,900$85,456 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $985$2,989 of above-market earnings on his DCA; for Ms. Baruffi includes $119,676 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which she is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $1,657 of above-market earnings on her DCA.
AmountFor 2017, amounts shown include: for Mr. Robbins includes $58,856$1,546,008 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP and $5,344which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $15,477 of above-market earnings on his DCA; for Mr. Stein, $276,704 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $2,027 of above-market earnings on his DCA; for Mr. Lawson, $196,366 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $1,593 of above-market earnings on his DCA; for Mr. McDonald, $282,604 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $2,027 of above-market earnings on his DCA; and for Ms. Baruffi, $140,390 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which she is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $1,040 of above-market earnings on her DCA.
For 2016, amounts shown include: for Mr. Stein, $144,953 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $3,459 of above-market earnings on his DCA; for Mr. Lawson, $129,771 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $1,207 of above-market earnings on his DCA; for Mr. McDonald, $204,854 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which he is not currently entitled to receive because such amounts are not fully vested, and $1,971 of above-market earnings on his DCA; and for Mr. Robbins, $151,430 of change in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP and $14,717 of above-market earnings on his DCA.
| (7) | Amount shown for Ms. DresselMr. Robbins includes $7,950$8,250 in 401(k) plan matching contributions, $13,250$13,750 in 401(k) discretionary contributions, $13,614$12,133 in split dollar life insurance premiums, $8,089 in split dollar bonus earnings, $240 in group term life insurance premiums, and $13,312 in accrued dividends on unvested Performance Shares, and $3,840 in non-qualified deferred compensation matching contributions.Shares. |
Amount shown for Mr. Sigrist includes $5,409 in 401(k) plan matching contributions, $9,014 in 401(k) discretionary contributions, $1,478 in split dollar life insurance premiums, $842 in split dollar bonus earnings, and $99 in group term life insurance premiums, and $1,168 in accrued dividends on unvested Performance Shares. Amount shown for Mr. Stein includes $7,950$8,250 in 401(k) plan matching contributions, $13,250$13,750 in 401(k) discretionary contributions, $2,429$2,970 in split dollar life insurance premiums, $2,765$1,980 in reimbursement of taxes on imputed income related to split dollar bonus earnings, $195 in group term life insurance $3,936premiums, $4,036 in accrued dividends on unvested Performance Shares, $2,6883,686 in non-qualified deferred compensation matching contributions, and $7,243$10,837 in Company contributions to a Unit Plan. Unit Planssupplemental retirement benefit plan (“UNIT plan”). UNIT plans are described in further detail under “Post Employment and Termination Benefits—Unit Plans.”
Amount shown for Mr. Lawson includes $7,950$8,250 in 401(k) plan matching contributions, $13,250$13,750 in 401(k) discretionary contributions, $2,393$3,290 in split dollar life insurance premiums, $3,261$2,193 in reimbursement of taxes on imputed income related to split dollar bonus earnings, $132 in group term life insurance $3,386premiums, $2,581 in accrued dividends on unvested Performance Shares, and $1,740$1,808 in non-qualified deferred compensation matching contributions. Amount shown for Mr. McDonald includes $7,950$8,250 in 401(k) plan matching contributions, $13,250$13,750 in 401(k) discretionary contributions, $3,532$4,602 in split dollar life insurance premiums, $3,700$3,068 in reimbursement of taxes on imputed income related to split dollar bonus earnings, $155 in group term life insurance $3,662premiums, $3,011 in accrued dividends on unvested Performance Shares, and $13,717$22,944 in Company contributions to a Unit Plan.UNIT plan. Amount shown for Mr. RobbinsMs. Baruffi includes $7,950$8,250 in 401(k) plan matching contributions, $13,250$13,750 in 401(k) discretionary contributions, $4,803$2,108 in split dollar life insurance premiums, $5,417$1,405 in reimbursement of taxes on imputed income related to split dollar bonus earnings, $121 in group term life insurance $4,073premiums, $2,484 in accrued dividends on unvested Performance Shares, $34,884and $832 in non-qualified deferred compensation matching contributions and $8,093 in temporary living expenses.contributions.
| (8) | Mr. Stein served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer until June 4, 2018 when Mr. Sigrist was appointed the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. |
EEquityquity Compensation Stock Option and Equity Compensation Plan. The 20142018 Plan provides for the grant of restricted stock, incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights. All eligible employees and directors may participate in the 20142018 Plan. As of December 31, 2015, 1,461,2602018, 3,015,957 shares remainremained available for future grant under the 20142018 Plan. The 20142018 Plan replaced the Amended and Restated Stock Option and Equity Compensation Plan (the “Former Equity Plan”);2014 Plan; however, any awards remaining outstanding under the Former Equity2014 Plan continue to be governed by the terms of that plan. 2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
| | 2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards | | 2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards | | Name | | Grant
Date | | | Estimated Future Payments Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1) | | | Estimated Future Payments
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2) | | | All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock | | | Grant Date Fair
Value of
Stock and Option | | | Grant Date
| | Estimated Future Payments Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | | Estimated Future Payments Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | | | All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3) | | | Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(3)(4) | | | | | Threshold
($) | | | Target
($) | | | Maximum
($) | | | Threshold
(#) | | | Target
(#) | | | Maximum
(#) | | | or Units
(#)(3) | | | Awards
($)(3)(4) | | | Threshold
($) | | | Target
($) | | | Maximum
($) | | | Threshold
(#) | | | Target
(#) | | | Maximum
(#) | | Melanie J. Dressel | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,241 | | | $ | 91,882 | | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | 3/28/2018 | | $ | 219,000 | | | $ | 438,000 | | | $ | 657,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 4,862 | | | | 9,723 | | | | 14,585 | | | | — | | | | 443,092 | | | 2/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,936 | | | $ | 164,446 | | | | | | 3/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,895 | | | | 11,790 | | | | 17,690 | | | | | | | $ | 701,851 | | | Gregory A. Sigrist | | | 6/4/2018 | | $ | 43,750 | | | $ | 87,500 | | | $ | 131,250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,370 | | | $ | 103,355 | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | $ | 183,750 | | | $ | 367,500 | | | $ | 551,250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,180 | | | | 2,360 | | | | 3,540 | | | | | | | $ | 126,520 | | Clint E. Stein | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,470 | | | | 70,025 | | | 3/28/2018 | | $ | 106,750 | | | $ | 213,500 | | | $ | 320,250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 1,235 | | | | 2,470 | | | | 3,705 | | | | — | | | | 112,558 | | | 2/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,324 | | | $ | 138,877 | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | $ | 70,000 | | | $ | 140,000 | | | $ | 210,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,660 | | | | 3,320 | | | | 4,980 | | | | | | | $ | 197,582 | | David C. Lawson | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,764 | | | | 50,009 | | | 3/28/2018 | | $ | 58,000 | | | $ | 116,000 | | | $ | 174,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 882 | | | | 1,764 | | | | 2,646 | | | | — | | | | 80,385 | | | 2/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,918 | | | $ | 80,134 | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | $ | 50,000 | | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 950 | | | | 1,900 | | | | 2,850 | | | | | | | $ | 113,074 | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,117 | | | | 60,017 | | | 3/28/2018 | | $ | 67,200 | | | $ | 134,400 | | | $ | 201,600 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 1,059 | | | | 2,117 | | | | 3,176 | | | | — | | | | 96,487 | | | 2/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,214 | | | $ | 92,501 | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | 180,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,105 | | | | 2,210 | | | | 3,320 | | | | | | | $ | 131,721 | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,646 | | | | 75,014 | | | | Kumi Y. Baruffi | | | 3/28/2018 | | $ | 58,000 | | | $ | 116,000 | | | $ | 174,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 1,323 | | | | 2,646 | | | | 3,969 | | | | — | | | | 120,578 | | | 2/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,918 | | | $ | 80,134 | | | | | 3/25/2015 | | | $ | 75,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 225,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/28/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 950 | | | | 1,900 | | | | 2,850 | | | | | | | $ | 113,074 | |
(1)
| Represents the possible range of possible cash payouts under the 20152018 annual cash incentive opportunities granted under the 2014 Plan. Actual amounts earned, as determined by the Committee in the first quarter of 2015,2019, are reflected in the 20152018 Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. See “Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Compensation Structure—Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.”
|
| (2) | Represents the possible range of Performance Shares granted on March 25, 201528, 2018 and June 4, 2018 under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, a sub-plansubplan under the 2014 Plan. Actual amounts of Performance Shares earned will be based on achieving relative ROAA and TSR compared to the KBW Regional Banking Index (KRX) and Columbia’s ROAA against targets established by the Committee as determined by the Committee, in each case over the 2015-20172018-2020 performance period. Dividends earned on Performance Shares will accrue, but will not be paid until vesting is determinable and will only be paid on those shares earned and released from restriction. See “CompensationDiscussion & Analysis—Compensation Structure—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.” |
| (3) | Represents the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted on March 25, 2015February 28, 2018 under the 2014 Plan and June 4, 2018 under the 2018 Plan that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date,February 28, 2020, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant dateFebruary 28, 2021 and the remaining 50% of which vestvesting on March 25, 2019.February 28, 2022. Dividends earned on Restricted Stock are paid to award holders at the same time as dividends are paid to shareholders. |
| (4) | Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of Restricted Stock and Performance Shares granted on February 28, 2018, March 25, 2015,28, 2018 and June 4, 2018, determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Assumptions used to calculate these amounts are set forth in Note 22 to the 20152018 Annual Report. The grant date fair value of Restricted Stock was based on the closing priceprices of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on the grant date,dates, February 28, 2018 ($41.78 per share), March 25, 201528, 2018 ($28.3542.01 per share) and June 4, 2018 ($43.61 per share). The grant date fair valuevalues of the Performance Shares isare shown at targetstretch performance and is 50% based on the closing price of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on the grant date,dates March 25, 201528, 2018 and June 28, 2018 ($28.3542.01 per share)share and $41.38, respectively) and 50% based on a fair value calculation using a Monte-Carlo simulation ($30.3837.34 per share)share and $30.10, respectively). |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | | Name | | Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
(1) | | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable | | | Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#) | | | Option
Exercise
Price
($) | | | Option
Expiration
Date | | | Number of
Share or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(2) | | | Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(3) | | | Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(4) | | | Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market of
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(3)(4) | | Melanie J. Dressel | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 14,991 | | | $ | 487,357 | | | | 23,585 | | | $ | 766,748 | | Clint E. Stein | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,120 | | | | 263,981 | | | | 6,705 | | | | 217,980 | | David C. Lawson | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,764 | | | | 187,388 | | | | 5,646 | | | | 183,551 | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,017 | | | | 260,633 | | | | 6,176 | | | | 200,782 | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | 1,958 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 136.93 | | | | 03/27/2017 | | | | 7,046 | | | | 229,065 | | | | 6,969 | | | | 226,562 | | | | | 1,165 | | | | | | | | | | | | 54.70 | | | | 04/20/2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,608 | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.91 | | | | 04/26/2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2018 | | | Name | | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | | | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable | | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Un-exercisable | | | Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#) | | | Option
Exercise
Price ($) | | | Option
Expiration
Date | | | Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(1) | | | Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(2) | | | Equity Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(3) | | | Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market of
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)(3) | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,302 | | | | 809,340 | | | | 28,940 | | | | 1,050,233 | | | Gregory A. Sigrist | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,370 | | | | 86,007 | | | | 3,540 | | | | 128,467 | | | Clint E. Stein | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,660 | | | | 713,461 | | | | 8,775 | | | | 318,445 | | | David C. Lawson | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,503 | | | | 235,994 | | | | 5,610 | | | | 203,587 | | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,607 | | | | 276,058 | | | | 6,545 | | | | 237,518 | | | Kumi Y. Baruffi | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,158 | | | | 223,474 | | | | 5,400 | | | | 195,966 | |
| (1) | Outstanding options forFor Mr. Robbins, were granted by West Coast Bancorp and became vested at the close of the merger between Columbia and West Coast Bancorp on April 1, 2013. |
(2) | For Ms. Dressel, represents 3,750 shares of restricted stock granted in 2012 that vest on February 22, 2016; 6,0001,323 shares of restricted stock granted on February 27, 2013March 25, 2015 that vest 30%on March 25, 2019; 2,741 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 24, 2016 that vest 37.5% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 62.5% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 4,302 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 22, 2017 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, 30% on the third anniversary, and 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 2,000date, respectively; 10,000 shares of Restricted Stockrestricted stock granted on April 26, 2017 that vest on April 26, 2019; and 3,936 shares of restricted stock granted on February 26, 2014 and 3,241 shares of Restricted Stock granted on March 25, 201528, 2018 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively. |
For Mr. Stein,Sigrist, represents 1,250 shares of restricted stock granted in 2012 that vest on February 22, 2016; 2,400 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 27, 2013 that vest 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 2,0002,370 shares of restricted stock granted on February 26, 2014 and 2,470 shares of Restricted Stock granted on March 25, 2015June 4, 2018 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively.
For Mr. Lawson,Stein, represents 2,0001,235 shares of restricted stock granted on October 1, 2013March 25, 2015 that vest 30%on March 25, 2019; 2,565 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 24, 2016 that vest 37.5% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 62.5% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 2,536 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 22, 2017 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, 30% on the third anniversary, and 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 2,000date, respectively; 10,000 shares of Restricted Stockrestricted stock granted on April 26, 2017 that vest on April 26, 2019; and 3,324 shares of restricted stock granted on February 26, 2014 and 1,764 shares of Restricted Stock granted on March 25, 201528, 2018 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively. For Mr. McDonald,Lawson, represents 1,500882 shares of restricted stock granted in 2012on March 25, 2015 that vest on February 22, 2016, 2,400March 25, 2019; 1,863 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 27, 201324, 2016 that vest 30%37.5% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 62.5% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 1,840 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 22, 2017 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, 30% on the third anniversary, and 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 2,000date, respectively; and 1,918 shares of restricted stock granted on February 26, 2014 and 2,117 shares of Restricted Stock granted on March 25, 201528, 2018 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively. For Mr. Robbins,McDonald, represents 2,4001,058 shares of restricted stock granted on April 1, 2013March 25, 2015 that vest 30%on March 25, 2019; 2,179 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 24, 2016 that vest 37.5% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 62.5% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 2,156 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 22, 2017 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, 30% on the third anniversary, and 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 2,000date, respectively; and 2,214 shares of Restricted Stockrestricted stock granted on February 26, 2014 and 2,646 shares of Restricted Stock granted on March 25, 201528, 2018 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively. For Ms. Baruffi, represents 818 shares of restricted stock granted on March 25, 2015 that vest on March 25, 2019; 1,722 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 24, 2016 that vest 37.5% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 62.5% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date; 1,700 shares of Restricted Stock granted on February 22, 2017 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, 30% on the third anniversary, and 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively; and 1,918 shares of restricted stock granted on February 28, 2018 that vest 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, 30% on the third anniversary and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively. (3)
| (2) | Amounts shown are calculated using the closing price of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on December 31, 20152018 of $32.51$36.29 per share. |
(4) | Amounts shown represent Performance Shares granted in 2014 and 2015 at stretch performance. (3) | Actual amounts vested and earned, if any, depend on actual performance against the performance measures for the 2014-20162017-2019 performance period that ends December 31, 20162019 and 2015-20172018-2020 performance period that ends December 31, 2017,2020, respectively. For Ms. Dressel,Mr. Robbins, represents 9,00011,250 Performance Shares granted on April 23, 2014February 22, 2017 and 14,58517,690 Performance Shares granted on March 25, 2015.28, 2018. For Mr. Sigrist, represents 3,540 Performance Shares granted on June 28, 2018. For Mr. Stein, represents 3,0003,795 Performance Shares granted on April 23, 2014February 22, 2017 and 6,7054,980 Performance Shares granted on March 25, 2015.28, 2018. For Mr. Lawson, represents 3,0002,760 Performance Shares granted on April 23, 2014February 22, 2017 and 2,6462,850 Performance Shares granted on March 25, 2015.28, 2018. For Mr. McDonald, represents 3,0003,225 Performance Shares granted on April 23, 2014February 22, 2017 and 3,1763,320 Performance Shares granted on March 25, 2015.28, 2018. For Mr. Robbins,Ms. Baruffi, represents 3,000 Performance Shares2,550 shares granted on April 23, 2014February 22, 2017 and 3,969 Performance Shares2,850 shares granted on March 25, 2015.28, 2018. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested40 | | | | | | | | | | | | Stock Awards | | Name | | Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#) | | | Value Realized
on Vesting
($) | | Melanie J. Dressel(1) | | | 7,500 | | | $ | 211,050 | | Clint E. Stein(2) | | | 2,350 | | | | 66,143 | | David C. Lawson(3) | | | 500 | | | | 15,685 | | Andrew L. McDonald(4) | | | 3,000 | | | | 84,420 | | Hadley S. Robbins(5) | | | 600 | | | | 17,310 | |
| 2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested | | Name
| | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | | | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | | | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | | | Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#) | | | Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)(1) | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,662 | | | | 256,437 | | | Gregory A. Sigrist | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | Clint E. Stein | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,298 | | | | 242,690 | | | David C. Lawson | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,839 | | | | 187,573 | | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,509 | | | | 212,914 | | Kumi Y. Baruffi
| | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,799 | | | | 184,818 | |
| (1) | For Ms. Dressel, represents the fair market value of 3,750 shares of restricted stock granted in 2011 that vested on February 23, 2015, 2,250 shares of restricted stock granted in 2012 that vested on February 20, 2015 and 1,500 shares of restricted stock granted in 2013 that vested on February 27, 2015. |
(2) | For Mr. Stein,Robbins, represents the fair market value of 1,000 shares of restricted stock granted in 20112014 that vested on February 23, 2015, 75026, 2018, 793 shares of restricted stock granted in 20122015 that vested on February 20, 2015, and 600March 23, 2018, 686 shares of restricted stock granted in 2013 that vested on February 27, 2015. |
(3) | For Mr. Lawson, represents the fair market value of 500 shares of restricted stock granted in 2013 that vested on October 1, 2015. |
(4) | For Mr. McDonald, represents the fair market value of 1,500 shares of restricted stock granted in 20112016 that vested on February 23, 2015, 9002018, and 4,183 performance shares of restricted stock granted in 20122016 that vested on February 20, 2015 and 600 shares of restricted stock granted in 2013 that vested on February 27, 2015. |
(5) | For Mr. Robbins, represents the fair market value of 600 shares of restricted stock granted in 2013 that vested on April 1, 2015.December 31, 2018. |
For Mr. Stein, represents the fair market value of 1,000 shares of restricted stock granted in 2014 that vested on February 26, 2018, 741 shares of restricted stock granted in 2015 that vested on March 23, 2018, 642 shares of restricted stock granted in 2016 that vested on February 23, 2018, and 3,915 performance shares granted in 2016 that vested on December 31, 2018. For Mr. Lawson, represents the fair market value of 1,000 shares of restricted stock granted in 2014 that vested on February 26, 2018, 529 shares of restricted stock granted in 2015 that vested on March 23, 2018, 466 shares of restricted stock granted in 2016 that vested on February 23, 2018, and 2,844 performance shares granted in 2016 that vested on December 31, 2018. For Mr. McDonald, represents the fair market value of 1,000 shares of restricted stock granted in 2014 that vested on February 26, 2018, 635 shares of restricted stock granted in 2015 that vested on March 23, 2018, 545 shares of restricted stock granted in 2016 that vested on February 23, 2018, and 3,329 performance shares granted in 2016 that vested on December 31, 2018. For Ms. Baruffi, represents the fair market value of 1,250 shares of restricted stock granted in 2014 that vested on November 30, 2018, 491 shares of restricted stock granted in 2015 that vested on March 23, 2018, 431 shares of restricted stock granted in 2016 that vested on February 23, 2018, and 2,627 performance shares granted in 2016 that vested on December 31, 2018. PPost-Employmentost-Employment and Termination Benefits The following is a discussion regarding the post-employment and termination arrangements currently in place for the Named Executives. The amounts are based on the maximum amounts that could be paid under these arrangements. 2018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Deferred Compensation Plan. In February 2004, the Board adopted the Deferred Compensation Plan for certain directors, a select group of senior management and key employees, as designated by resolution of the Board. The Deferred Compensation Plan generally provides for the deferral of certain taxable income earned by participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan. Designated officers or key employees may elect to defer annually under the Deferred Compensation Plan up to 50% of his or her salary to be earned in the calendar year, and up to 100% of any cash bonuses.
The following table provides information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation paid to the Named Executives during fiscal year 2015.2018. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Executive
Contributions in
Last FY ($)
(1) | | | Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($) | | | Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
(2) | | | Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($) | | | Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE
($)
(3) | | Melanie J. Dressel | | $ | 48,000 | | | $ | 3,840 | | | $ | 15,278 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 432,534 | | Clint E. Stein | | | 33,600 | | | | 2,688 | | | | 6,322 | | | | — | | | | 179,698 | | David C. Lawson | | | 21,750 | | | | 1,740 | | | | 1,778 | | | | — | | | | 56,342 | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,464 | | | | — | | | | 117,978 | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | 436,045 | | | | 34,884 | | | | 24,796 | | | | — | | | | 803,138 | |
| | | Name
| | Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($) (1) | | | Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($) | | | Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($) (2) | | | Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($) | | | Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($) (3) | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 58,453 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,044,572 | | | Gregory A. Sigrist | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | Clint E. Stein | | | 46,081 | | | | 3,686 | | | | 18,247 | | | | — | | | | 342,462 | | | David C. Lawson | | | 22,605 | | | | 1,808 | | | | 7,377 | | | | — | | | | 140,275 | | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,654 | | | | — | | | | 136,778 | | Kumi Y. Baruffi
| | | 10,400 | | | | 832 | | | | 4,245 | | | | — | | | | 81,741 | |
| (1) | Amounts were deferred in 20152018 under the Deferred Compensation Plan, which is described below under “—“Deferred Compensation Plan.” The amounts for Ms. Dressel and Messrs. Stein and Lawson and Ms. Baruffi are reflected in the salary column of the Summary Compensation Table. The amount for Mr. Robbins is reflected in the salary and bonus columns of the Summary Compensation Table. |
| (2) | The interest rate is the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.58%. The plan administratorPlan Administrator annually reviews for appropriateness the calculation of the rate of interest (the “Interest Crediting Rate”) that is applied to a participant’s Deferred Compensation Plan Account (“DCA”)DCA in the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Interest Crediting Rate is adjusted quarterly for fluctuations in the three-month LIBOR rate. Plan participants are notified of any adjustments to the Interest Crediting Rate. |
On the last date of each month, the each participant’s DCA is credited with an amount equal to the product of (i) one-twelfth (1/12th)12th) of the Interest Crediting Rate for the quarter in which such month occurs, times (ii) the average balance of the DCA in the DCA for that month. The credited amount is treated as part of the credit balance for all purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan. As used herein, the average balance in a DCA for a month is equal to the quotient determined by dividing (i) the sum of the credit balance in the DCA at the close of business each day in the calendar month, by (ii) the number of days in such month. | (3) | For Ms. DresselMr. Robbins includes amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2017 ($15,477), 2016 ($113,664), 2015 ($476,273), and 2014 ($39,227), 2013 ($20,704), 2012 ($15,894), 2011 ($12,360), 2010 ($12,360), 2009 ($12,360), 2008 ($16,345), 2007 ($17,829), 2006 ($16,733), 2005 ($14,769), 2004 ($12,720) and 2003 ($76,202)299,808). For Mr. Stein includes amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2017 ($39,323), 2016 ($47,346), 2015 ($41,223) 2014 ($35,132), 2013 ($25,407), and 2012 ($16,005). For Mr. Lawson includes amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2017 ($21,952), 2016 ($25,200), 2015 ($23,877), 2014 ($23,796). For Mr. McDonald includes amounts previously reported in in the Summary Compensation Table for 2017 ($2,027), 2016 ($1,971), 2015 ($985), 2014 ($106), 2013 ($464), 2012 ($1,118), 2010 ($5,562), 2009 ($5,191), 2008 ($6,799), 2007 ($2,072), 2006 ($9,733), 2005 ($11,149), and 2004 ($35,000). For Mr. RobbinsMs. Baruffi includes amounts previously reportedrecorded in the Summary Compensation Tabletable for 20142017 ($299,808)1,040) and 2016 ($62,017). |
Deferred Compensation Plan. In February 2004, the Board adopted the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for certain directors, a select group of senior management and key employees, as designated by resolution of the Board. The Deferred Compensation Plan generally provides for the deferral of certain taxable income earned by participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan. Designated officers or key employees may elect to defer annually under the Deferred Compensation Plan up to 50% of his or her salary to be earned in the calendar year, and up to 100% of any cash bonuses or other incentive compensation. In October 2016, the Board and the Committee approved an Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, which froze that plan to new participants effective as of October 26, 2016, and a 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan. Except as noted below, the 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan is substantially the same as the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan. Distribution Election Notice. At the time a participant first makes an election to defer covered compensation, he or she must deliver to the Company a signed “distribution election notice” in which he or she elects to receive distributions of the credit balance in his or her DCA in the form of either a single lump-sum payment or monthly installment payments over a period not to exceed 120 months. A participant may change such election from time to time; but if a distribution election notice is delivered to the Company less than 12 calendar months before the month in which distributions begin, such notice will not be effective and the Company will instead treat the distribution election notice that was last delivered to the Company before such 12 calendar month period as the effective notice. Distributions Upon Retirement or Disability. The Company will distribute the credit balance in a DCA maintained for a participant at the time he or she retires or becomes disabled as either a single lump sum or monthly installment payments, as elected by the participant. If the participant has elected a single lump-sum distribution, such distribution will be made within 90 days after the date that a participant retires or becomes disabled. If the participant has elected monthly installment payments, such distribution will be made on the first day of each month, beginning with the first day of the third month following the month in which a participant retires or becomes disabled and continuing until the full amount of the DCA maintained for the participant has been distributed. Until the DCA has been distributed in full, interest will continue to be credited to the DCA. The monthly installment payments will be in as nearly equal amounts as possible. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions of the Plan, if the participant dies after monthly installment payments of the credit balance in the DCA maintained for him or her have begun, then the remaining credit balance in the DCA will be distributed to his or her designated beneficiary in a single lump sum within 30 days after the Company receives notice that the participant has died. Lump-Sum Distributions Upon Termination of Employment Other Than Because of Death, Disability, or Retirement or if DCA is Less Than $25,000. Notwithstanding The 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan provides that, notwithstanding a participant’s election to receive a distribution of the credit balance in the DCA maintained for him or her in the form of monthly installment payments, such credit balance will be distributed to the participant in a single lump sum within 90 days after the date on which he or she terminates his or her services or employment with the Company, if (i) such termination of services or employment is for any reason other than because he or she retires or becomes disabled, or (ii) if the credit balance of the DCA maintained for him or her does not exceed $25,000. Unlike the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, the 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan permits participants to elect installment payments for any termination of employment, rather than only on a termination due to retirement or disability. If a participant’s services or employment with the Company is terminated because of his or her death, the credit balance in the participant’s DCA will be distributed to his or her designated beneficiary. Pension Benefits
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Plan Name
(1) | | | Number of Years
Credited Service
(#) | | | Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(2) | | | Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
(3) | | Melanie J. Dressel | | | SERP | | | | 23 | | | $ | 6,497,809 | | | $ | — | | Clint E. Stein | | | SERP | | | | 10 | | | | 721,460 | | | | — | | David C. Lawson | | | SERP | | | | 2 | | | | 207,298 | | | | — | | Andrew L. McDonald | | | SERP | | | | 11 | | | | 1,337,757 | | | | — | | Hadley S. Robbins | | | SERP | | | | 9 | | | | 815,129 | | | | — | |
2018 Pension Benefits | Name | | Plan Name
(1) | | Number of Years Credited Service
(#) | | | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
($)
(2) | | | Payments During Last Fiscal Year
($) | | | Hadley S. Robbins | | SERP | | | 12 | | | | 2,742,105 | | | $ | — | | | Gregory A. Sigrist | | SERP | | | 1 | | | | 77,081 | | | | | | | Clint E. Stein | | SERP | | | 13 | | | | 1,173,217 | | | | — | | | David C. Lawson | | SERP | | | 5 | | | | 660,623 | | | | — | | | Andrew L. McDonald | | SERP | | | 14 | | | | 1,910,671 | | | | — | | | Kumi Y. Baruffi | | SERP | | | 4 | | | | 448,620 | | | | — | |
| (1) | Under the terms of the SERP, executives must, in addition to other conditions, be fully vested. For Ms. Dressel, fullFull vesting requires ten years of employment by the Company and for all other Named Executives, vesting occursis based on a twenty-year20 year schedule. As of December 31, 2015,2018, only Messrs. Robbins and McDonald were eligible to receive benefits upon a voluntary termination. Messrs. Sigrist, Stein and Lawson will first become eligible to receive vested benefits upon a voluntary termination at ages 61, 55 and 65, respectively and Ms. Dressel is 100%Baruffi will first become eligible to receive vested and Messrs. Stein, Lawson, McDonald and Robbins are 50%, 0%, 55% and 40% vested, respectively.benefits upon a voluntary termination at age 55. Named Executives (other than Mr. Robbins) must have at least ten10 years of service with the Company in order to receive benefits upon a voluntary termination that occurs prior to reaching the early retirement age of 55. Mr. Robbins became fully vested in a retirement benefit upon the Company’s acquisition of West Coast Bancorp. |
| (2) | The estimated maximum annual retirement benefit payable under the SERP for the Named Executives upon reachingachieving age 64 for Mr. Robbins and age 65 for Ms. Dressel and Messrs. Stein, Lawson and McDonald and RobbinsMs. Baruffi; and is as follows: Ms. Dressel $454,362,follows assuming a single life annuity: Messrs. Robbins, Sigrist, Stein, Lawson, and McDonald, $336,446, $234,033, $423,583, $96,069 and Robbins $295,703, $83,041, $228,085$229,935, respectively and $162,290, respectively.Ms. Baruffi, $279,300. |
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Over the years, Columbia has implemented a supplemental executive retirement plan, or SERP, for certain executive officers of Columbia to provide retirement benefits to those officers. TheWhere a participant has twenty years of service and is therefore fully vested, the SERP is designed to provide lifetime retirement benefits equal to 60% of the average of the three highest years of base salary (which we refer to as the “SERP formula”), with an annual two percent cost of living adjustment to benefit payments. Prior to 2015, the SERP benefits available to each participant were calculated based on a fixed dollar amount set forth in the officer’s SERP, which was intended to approximate the SERP formula. In 2015, in order to better account for fluctuations in the participant’s base salary over time, the Company amended the SERP to provide that the SERP benefit available to each participant would instead equal the SERP formula described above. This change contributedOn September 27, 2017, the Committee approved an amendment to an increase in the actuarial present value of projected benefit under the SERP, which is reflected aboverevised the vesting schedule from vesting on an annual basis to vesting on a monthly basis in order to conform vesting with the Summary Compensation Table, but does not represent any cash compensation paid tomethodology for determining early retirement benefits under the Named Executives in 2015.SERP. Each SERP includes a number of restrictions on payment, including a requirement, subject to certain exceptions, that the Named Executive (other than Mr. Robbins) attain age 65 (62 in the event of a change-in-control). Each Named Executive’s SERP, other than Mr. Robbins’ SERP, includes a number of potential adjustments to the date on which retirement payments are initiated and to the amount of the Named Executive’s benefit. These potential adjustments include provisions for early retirement subject to the early commencement reduction factor of 5% for each year that the benefit is paid prior to reaching age 65, payable upon reaching age 55, with a minimum of 10 years of credited service, and a 2% annual inflation adjustment to benefit payments. As of December 31, 2015, Ms. Dressel and2018, Mr. McDonald werewas eligible for early retirement benefits. Named Executives terminated pursuant to a change-in-control of Columbia shallwill be vested in the benefit that the executive would have received had the Named Executive remained employed by Columbia until reaching the normal retirement age. In the event the Named Executive becomes disabled, the executive will be 100% vested, regardless of tenure. Other potential SERP adjustments include an elimination of benefits if the Named Executive violates non-competition requirements or if the Named Executive is terminated for cause or resigns voluntarily before reaching the earlynormal retirement age and does not have ten years of service or before achieving 100% vesting. Under the terms of each SERP, the Named Executive and the Company will cooperate and use all reasonable efforts, in compliance with applicable law, to minimize the amount of any excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. The SERP is unsecured and unfunded and there are no plan assets. Columbia has purchased Bank-Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) policies on the lives of the Named Executives and other officers and intends to use income from these policies to offset SERP benefit expenses. In 2015,2016, Columbia purchased additional BOLI policies in connection with two split dollar life insurance agreements entered into with Ms. Dressel, which provide Ms. Dressel’s beneficiaries with benefits comparable to those provided to the beneficiaries of other senior officers.supplement Columbia’s existing portfolio. The BOLI policies, through the split dollar life insurance agreements with the officers, provide a death benefit equal to three times the officer’s then current base salary and approximately ten times the projected benefit at normal retirement age of the officer’s SERP. The agreements take into account any other life insurance policies purchased by and owned by the Company that pay benefits to the participant’s beneficiary at death. This split dollar benefit is payable to the officer’s beneficiaries if the officer dies while employed with the Company, or, in the case of Ms. Dressel, while serving on the Company’s Board, in which case the officer (and his or her beneficiaries) would not be entitled to any benefits under the SERP. If the officer retires or terminates employment for any reason other than death, then the officer and his or her beneficiaries forfeit any benefits under the split dollar agreement, and all proceeds from the BOLI policies are instead paid to the Company. The income generated from the BOLI policies is projected to, on a cumulative basis, substantially offset the ongoing costs of the SERP program. This projection includes assumptions related to future BOLI policy performance, the Bank’s cost of funds and discount rates applicable to the SERP program. Any excess revenue generated from the BOLI will be used to offset other employee benefit costs. BOLI is not a permissible bank investment but BOLI may be purchased in order to offset employee benefit expenses pursuant to the authority granted by the “Interagency Statement on the Purchase and Risk Management of Life Insurance,” dated December 7, 2004 and described for State-Chartered Federal Reserve member banks in Supervisory Letter SR 04-19. As described below, the Company had previously entered into Unit Plans with each of Messrs. McDonald and Stein in lieu of a SERP. In 2013, the Company entered into SERPs with Messrs. McDonald and Stein, and their respective Unit PlansPlan were frozen.frozen to new contributions. Payments under each Unit Plan were postponed until benefits are drawn from the Named Executive’s SERP (and the SERP benefits will be reduced by the amount that is attributable to the respective Unit Plan). Long-Term Incentive Awards Change-in-Control Treatment. In the event of a change-in-control, all unvested 2014 Performance Shares vest in full as of the date of the closing of such change-in-control transaction based on stretch performance. For the 2015 Performance Shares, the Committee determined that, in the event of a change-in-control, all unvested Shares will vest in full as of the date of the closing of such change-in-control transaction (for Performance Shares, based on the greater of target or actual performance. The Committee intends that future awards of Performanceperformance) unless the Shares are replaced or assumed, in which case the Shares will provide for change-in-control vesting treatment consistent with the change-in-control vesting treatment in the 2015 Performance Shares.continue as replaced or assumed. Executive Employment Agreement. Ms. Dressel Mr. Robbins serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Columbia and Columbia Bank pursuant to an employment agreement entered into effective AugustJuly 1, 2004.2017. The term of the employment agreement with Ms. Dressel is a rolling three-year term that providesMr. Robbins extends for termination by either party through a notice of non-renewal submitted at least 60 days prior to the anniversary of the agreement.Ms. Dressel’sthree-years following its effective date.
Mr. Robbins’ employment agreement provides that if herhis employment is terminated without cause or if shehe resigns for good reason, then she willhe would receive salary and benefits for the greater ofcash severance equal to two years or the balance of the contract term,times his annual base salary, a prorated portion of any incentive payment earned during the year of termination, continued welfare benefits for two years and all forfeiture provisions regardingvesting of a pro rata portion of his long-term incentive awards (based on the portion of the vesting period in which Mr. Robbins remained employed with the Company), subject to achievement of any outstanding restricted stock or other compensation agreements will lapse.performance criteria. The employment agreement also provides for certain benefits and payments if Ms. DresselMr. Robbins terminates herhis employment within two years following a change-in-control (as defined in the agreement) or if Ms. Dressel’sMr. Robbins’ employment iswas terminated by the Company without cause or by Ms. DresselMr. Robbins with good reason at any time from and after six months prior to the public announcement of a transaction that will result in a change-in-control. In such event, in addition to the continued benefits and payment of base salary described above (as well as the lapsing of any forfeiture provisions), the agreement provides that Ms. Dressel willMr. Robbins would receive an amount equal to two2.5 times any incentive payment she received duringthe sum of his annual base salary and target bonus, a prorated target bonus for the year preceding herof termination, continued welfare benefits for 30 months and all of her stockhis long-term incentive awards will fully vest and any restrictions will lapse.would be treated in accordance with their terms. In the event Ms. DresselMr. Robbins is terminated without cause, or shehe voluntarily terminates for good reason, and within six months the Company publicly announcesannounced a change-in-control, upon closing of the change-in-control, the agreement provides that she willhe would be entitled to receive the change-in-control payments set forth above, less any payments that shehe received as a termination payment. Effective February 1, 2009, Ms. Dressel voluntarily agreed to an amendment to her employment agreement that provided that if the total payment and benefits to be received by her as a result of a termination of employment in connection with a change-in-control would be in an amount that would cause them to be a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, such payments would be reduced so that the total amount of such payments and benefits is $1 less than the amount constituting a parachute payment. Ms. Dressel’s employment agreement was amended in February 2015 to remove this “cutback” provision. The 2015 amendment to Ms. Dressel’s employment agreement provides that Ms. Dressel and the Company will cooperate and use all reasonable efforts, in compliance with applicable law, to minimize the amount of any excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.
The table below shows the maximum amounts that could be paid to Ms. DresselMr. Robbins under herhis agreements, and (i) is based on herhis salary at December 31, 2015;2018; and (ii) assumes the triggering event was December 31, 2015. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Termination/Change-in-Control Payments – Melanie J. Dressel | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Voluntary
Termination
For Good Reason | | | Termination
w/o Cause | | | Termination
Due to CIC (1) | | | Retirement | | Employment Agreement(2) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,470,000 | | | $ | 1,470,000 | | | $ | 1,470,000 | | | $ | — | | Targeted Annual Incentive(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 367,500 | | | | 367,500 | | | | — | | | | — | | CIC Termination Payment(4) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 735,000 | | | | — | | Benefits Payable Under SERP(5) | | | 3,116,282 | | | | 6,526,000 | | | | 432,726 | | | | 432,726 | | | | 432,726 | | | | 454,362 | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(6) | | | 2,205,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | Group Term Life Insurance(7) | | | 600,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | Healthcare and Other Benefits(8) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,080 | | | | 19,080 | | | | 19,080 | | | | — | | 401(k) Employer Contribution(8) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,950 | | | | 7,950 | | | | 7,950 | | | | — | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(9) | | | 1,254,106 | | | | 1,254,106 | | | | 1,254,106 | | | | 1,254,106 | | | | 1,254,106 | | | | — | | Total | | $ | 7,175,388 | | | $ | 7,780,106 | | | $ | 3,551,362 | | | $ | 3,551,362 | | | $ | 3,918,862 | | | $ | 454,362 | |
| | | | 2018 Termination/Change-in-Control Payments – Hadley S. Robbins | | | | | | | Death | | | | Disability | | | | Voluntary Termination For Good Reason (Not Due to CIC) | | | | Termination
w/o Cause (Not Due to CIC) | | | | Termination Due to CIC(1) | | | | Retirement | | | Employment Agreement(2) | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,460,000 | | | $ | 1,460,000 | | | $ | 1,460,000 | | | $ | — | | | Annual Incentive(3) | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 503,317 | | | $ | 503,317 | | | $ | 438,000 | | | | — | | | CIC Termination Payment(4) | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 1,460,000 | | | | — | | | Benefits Payable Under SERPs or Split Dollar Life Insurance(5) | | | $ | 3,410,096 | | | $ | 4,803,858 | | | $ | 181,773 | * | | $ | 181,773 | * | | $ | 230,542 | * | | | — | | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(6) | | | $ | 2,190,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | Healthcare and Other Benefits(7) | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 20,352 | | | $ | 20,352 | | | $ | 25,440 | | | | — | | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(8) | | | $ | 1,859,572 | | | $ | 1,859,572 | | | $ | 806,703 | | | $ | 806,703 | | | $ | 1,859,572 | | | $ | 288,105 | | | Total | | | $ | 7,459,668 | | | $ | 6,663,430 | | | $ | 2,972,145 | | | $ | 2,972,145 | | | $ | 5,473,554 | | | $ | 288,105 | |
* Reflects the annual lifetime annuity payable following the triggering event under the terms of the applicable plan. | (1) | In the event Ms. Dressel isMr. Robbins was terminated without cause, or she terminateshe voluntarily terminated for good reason, and within six months the Company publicly announcesannounced a change-in-control, upon closing of the change-in-control, she willhe would be entitled to receive change-in-control payments,lessany payments that shehe received as a termination payment. |
| (2) | Represents two times Ms. Dressel’sMr. Robbins annual salary in the year of termination payable in equal monthly installments over two years following termination. |
| (3) | For voluntary termination for good reason and termination without cause, represents the prorated portion of any incentive payment earned during the year of termination payable in a lump sum.sum; provided that, if such termination is due to change-in-control, represents the prorated portion of Mr. Robbins’ target annual incentive. |
| (4) | For termination due to change-in-control, represents two0.5 times Ms. Dressel’sMr. Robbins annual target incentive compensation for the calendar year immediately precedingsalary in the year whenof termination occursplus 2.5 times Mr. Robbins target annual incentive payable in equal monthly installments over a lump sum.30-month period following termination. |
| (5) | RepresentsReflects the maximum annual lifetime benefit payable and is subject to a 2% annual inflation adjustment. Benefits are payable monthly. For voluntary termination for good reason and retirement, amounts represent benefits reduced by the early commencement reduction factor of 5% payable because Ms. Dressel has reached the early retirement age. For termination due to change-in-control, amount represents full benefits because she has reached age 62 and for separation due to disability and termination without cause, represents full benefits.aggregate SERP benefits are generally subject(or split dollar life insurance benefits calculated based on SERP benefits) to forfeiturewhich Mr. Robbins would be entitled, including the retirement benefit in which Mr. Robbins vested upon breachthe Company’s acquisition of West Coast Bancorp, which had a three-year non-compete covenant.value at December 29, 2018 of $1,241,383 and which reduces the benefits otherwise payable under Mr. Robbins’ existing SERP. See “Pension Benefits” above for more details regarding these benefits. Annual amounts reflected in the table above reflect a single lifetime annuity; however Mr. Robbins alternatively may elect a joint and survivor annuity. |
Benefits on Death. Death benefits are not payable pursuant to the SERP; however, in the event of Mr. Robbins’ death while employed, a Split Dollar Agreement provides a one-time lump sum benefit of a stated dollar amount calculated as ten times the projected annual SERP benefit at normal retirement. Benefits on Disability. In the event that Mr. Robbins becomes Disabled, the amount represents a one-time lump sum payment calculated as the present value of the projected stream of retirement benefit payments that Mr. Robbins would expect to receive had he remained employed until normal retirement age. Benefits on Termination without Cause or Due to CIC. Upon a termination without cause or due to a change-in-control, benefits are payable in a lifetime annuity. | (6) | Represents the amount equal to three times base salary as of the date of death that would be due to Ms. Dressel’sMr. Robbins’ beneficiaries under a bank owned life insurance policy payable by the insurer. |
| (7) | Represents the amount as of the date of death that would be due Ms. Dressel’s beneficiaries under a group term life insurance plan payable by the insurer. |
(8) | Represents the value of continued employer-paid health and welfare benefits for two years following termination.termination (or in the event of a termination due to change-in-control, for 30 months following termination). |
(9)(8) | RepresentsIn the case of death, disability or termination in connection with a change-in control, represents the fair market value of unvested equity awards with performance shown at stretch performance. In the case of a voluntary termination for good reason or a termination without cause not in connection with a change-in-control, represents the fair market value of a prorated portion of the unvested equity awards with performance shown at stretch performance. In the case of retirement, represents a prorated portion of Performance Shares at stretch performance. Fair market value was determined based on the closing price of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on December 31, 20152018 of $32.51$36.29 per share. Performance Shares granted in 2015 are shown at stretch performance. |
Change-in-controlChange-in-Control Agreements. Columbia Bank has entered into change-in-control agreements with Messrs. Sigrist, Stein, Lawson and McDonald and Robbins.Ms. Baruffi. The agreements contain provisions, similar to those contained in the employment agreement for Ms. DresselMr. Robbins discussed above, that require payments in the event of termination of employment without cause or by the executive for good reason within 365 days following a change-in-control (as defined in the agreements) or termination of employment without cause prior to the change-in-control at any time from and after sixty days prior to the public announcement of a transaction that will result in a change-in-control, provided that the change-in-control occurs within eighteen18 months of the executive’s termination date. Under the agreements, the executives are entitled to (i) receive their base salary for terms of two years; (ii) accelerated vesting of options; and (iii) removal of restrictions on any restricted stock or other restricted securities, subject to Federal securities laws. These agreements also contain a covenant that the executive will not compete with or solicit employee, customer or business partner of Columbia or any of its subsidiaries for up to two years after the commencement of severance benefit payments, unless payments of such severance benefits are waived by the executive. The terms of the agreements are five years unless otherwise extended in writing. In 2018, the Company extended the change-in-control agreement with Mr. Lawson for an additional five years. Unit Plans. Columbia previously entered into Unit Plans with each of Mr. McDonald (three plans, one each in 2004, 2006 and 2007) and Mr. Stein (in 2008). The plans were provided primarily to supplement retirement benefits in lieu of a SERP. Each separate Unit Plan provides that the executive will begin receiving a monthly payment beginning the first month following the tenth anniversary of each plan, based on an annual aggregate payment of $25,000 per year for ten years. In the event the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause, or he is terminated due to disability, the executive will be entitled to receive a payment based on the prorated portion of his term of employment, payable in monthly payments following the tenth anniversary of each plan. If the executive leaves the employment of Columbia prior to expiration during the respective ten-year period, the entire amount is forfeited. Once receiving the benefit, there is a non-competition clause restricting the executive from working for a competitor. As noted above, in 2013, the Company entered into a SERP with Messrs. McDonald and Stein. Benefits under the Unit Plans were frozen at the then current levels.to new contributions. In the event any benefit payments due Messrs. McDonald or Stein pursuant to their respective SERP plans are to be made simultaneously with payment amounts due them pursuant to their respective Unit Plans, then any SERP benefit payments will be reduced by amounts to be paid out from their Unit Plans. The reduced SERP benefit payment will be determined by deducting the amount of the Unit Plan payments from the scheduled SERP benefit payments. Once the Unit Plan benefit payment periods expire, retirement benefit payments under the SERP plan will no longer be reduced. The tables below show the maximum amounts that could be paid to Messrs. Sigrist, Stein, Lawson, McDonald and RobbinsMs. Baruffi under their respective agreements, which are based on (i) the executive’s salary at December 31, 2015;2018; and (ii) assumes the triggering event was December 31, 2015. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Termination/Change-in-Control Payments—Clint E. Stein | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Voluntary
Termination
For Good Reason | | | Termination
w/o Cause | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 700,000 | | | $ | — | | Benefits Payable under SERP(2) | | | 3,789,290 | | | | 1,877,000 | | | | — | | | | 1,034,000 | | | | 1,034,000 | | | | — | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | | 1,050,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | | 481,961 | | | | 481,961 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 481,961 | | | | — | | Total | | $ | 5,321,251 | | | $ | 2,358,961 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,034,000 | | | $ | 2,215,961 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Termination/Change-in-Control Payments—David C. Lawson | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Voluntary
Termination
For Good Reason | | | Termination
w/o Cause | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 500,000 | | | $ | — | | Benefits Payable under SERP(2) | | | 947,460 | | | | 878,000 | | | | — | | | | 39,937 | | | | 39,937 | | | | — | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | | 750,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | | 370,939 | | | | 370,939 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 370,939 | | | | — | | Total | | $ | 2,068,399 | | | $ | 1,248,939 | | | | — | | | $ | 39,937 | | | $ | 910,876 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Termination/Change-in-Control Payments—Andrew L. McDonald | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Voluntary
Termination
For Good Reason | | | Termination
w/o Cause | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 600,000 | | | $ | — | | Benefits Payable under SERP(2) | | | 2,391,960 | | | | 2,307,000 | | | | 95,703 | | | | 95,703 | | | | 95,703 | | | | 95,703 | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | | 900,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | | 461,414 | | | | 461,414 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 461,414 | | | | — | | Total | | $ | 3,753,374 | | | $ | 2,768,414 | | | $ | 95,703 | | | $ | 95,703 | | | $ | 1,157,117 | | | $ | 95,703 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Termination/Change-in-Control Payments—Hadley S. Robbins | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Voluntary
Termination
For Good Reason | | | Termination
w/o Cause | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 750,000 | | | $ | — | | Benefits Payable under SERP(2) | | | 1,740,760 | | | | 2,106,000 | | | | — | | | | 1,793,000 | | | | 1,793,000 | | | | — | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | | 1,125,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | | 455,628 | | | | 455,628 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 455,628 | | | | — | | Total | | $ | 3,321,388 | | | $ | 2,561,628 | | | | — | | | $ | 1,793,000 | | | $ | 2,998,628 | | | | — | |
| | | 2018 Termination/Change-in-Control Payments – Gregory A. Sigrist | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Termination
w/o Cause
(Not Due to CIC) | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 750,000 | | | $ | — | | | Benefits Payable Under SERPs, Unit Plans or Split Dollar Life Insurance(2) | | $ | 2,361,540 | | | $ | 1,953,186 | | | | — | | | $ | 1,329,637 | | | | — | | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | $ | 1,125,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | $ | 214,474 | | | $ | 214,474 | | | | — | | | $ | 214,474 | | | | — | | | Total | | $ | 3,701,014 | | | $ | 2,167,660 | | | | — | | | $ | 2,294,111 | | | | — | | | | |
| | | 2018 Termination/Change-in-Control Payments - Clint E. Stein | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Termination
w/o Cause
(Not Due to CIC) | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 854,000 | | | $ | — | | | Benefits Payable Under SERPs, Unit Plans or Split Dollar Life Insurance(2) | | $ | 4,132,638 | * | | $ | 2,873,725 | | | $ | 1,110,302 | | | $ | 1,708,157 | | | | — | | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | $ | 1,281,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | $ | 1,031,906 | | | $ | 1,031,906 | | | | — | | | $ | 1,031,906 | | | | — | | | Total | | $ | 6,445,544 | | | $ | 3,905,631 | | | $ | 1,110,302 | | | $ | 3,594,063 | | | | — | | | | |
* Includes $249,960, which is the aggregate amount that would be payable in monthly installments over a ten-year period under Mr. Stein’s Unit Plan. | | | 2018 Termination/Change-in-Control Payments - David C. Lawson | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Termination
w/o Cause
(Not Due to CIC) | | | Termination Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 580,000 | | | $ | — | | | Benefits Payable Under SERPs or Split Dollar Life Insurance(2) | | $ | 947,460 | | | $ | 1,259,351 | | | $ | 33,759 | * | | $ | 63,167 | * | | | — | | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | $ | 870,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | $ | 439,581 | | | $ | 439,581 | | | | — | | | $ | 439,581 | | | | — | | | Total | | $ | 2,257,041 | | | $ | 1,698,932 | | | $ | 33,759 | | | $ | 1,082,748 | | | | — | | | | |
* Reflects the annual lifetime annuity payable following the triggering event under the terms of the applicable plan.
| | | 2018 Termination/Change-in-Control Payments - Andrew L. McDonald | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Termination
w/o Cause
(Not Due to CIC) | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 672,000 | | | $ | — | | | Benefits Payable Under SERPs, Unit Plans or Split Dollar Life Insurance(2) | | $ | 3,141,840 | * | | $ | 2,888,360 | | | $ | 98,354 | ** | | $ | 138,195 | ** | | $ | 98,354 | ** | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | $ | 1,008,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | $ | 513,576 | | | $ | 513,576 | | | | — | | | $ | 513,576 | | | $ | 77,210 | | | Total | | $ | 4,663,416 | | | $ | 3,401,936 | | | $ | 98,354 | | | $ | 1,323,771 | | | $ | 175,564 | |
* Includes $749,880, which is the aggregate amount that would be payable in monthly installments over a ten-year period under Mr. McDonald’s Unit Plans. ** Reflects the annual lifetime annuity payable following the triggering event under the terms of the applicable plan. | | | 2018 Termination/Change-in-Control Payments – Kumi Y. Baruffi | | | | | Death | | | Disability | | | Termination
w/o Cause
(Not Due to CIC) | | | Termination
Due to CIC | | | Retirement | | | Change in Control Agreement(1) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 580,000 | | | $ | — | | | Benefits Payable Under SERPs or Split Dollar Life Insurance(2) | | $ | 2,529,593 | | | $ | 1,847,427 | | | $ | 257,447 | | | $ | 1,153,915 | | | | — | | | Bank Owned Life Insurance(3) | | $ | 870,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | FMV of Accelerated Equity Vesting(4) | | $ | 419,440 | | | $ | 419,440 | | | | — | | | $ | 419,440 | | | | — | | | Total | | $ | 3,819,033 | | | $ | 2,266,867 | | | $ | 257,447 | | | $ | 2,153,355 | | | | — | | | | |
| (1) | The amount for Messrs. Stein, Lawson, McDonald and RobbinsMs. Baruffi represents two times each Named Executive’s annual base salary payable in equal monthly installments for two years following the termination date. |
| (2) | Death Benefits are not technicallyReflects the benefits to which each Named Executive would be entitled under their SERPs (or split dollar life insurance benefits calculated based on SERP benefits) and, in the case of Messrs. McDonald and Stein, under their Unit Plans, which reduce the benefits otherwise payable pursuant to the SERP; however,under their SERPs (except in the event of death of a Named Executive while employed, a Split Dollar Agreement provides a benefit of a stated dollar amount calculated as ten times the target SERP benefit at Normal Retirement. In the event participant becomes Disabled, thedeath). See “Pension Benefits” and “Unit Plans” above for more details regarding these benefits. Annual amounts for Messrs. Stein, Lawson, and McDonald represent (i) a one-time lump sum paymentreflected in the event of disability;tables above reflect a single lifetime annuity; however the Named Executives alternatively may elect a joint and (ii) the maximum amount payable based on the applicable percentage accelerated to be that which they would receive if they remained employed until normal retirement age, multiplied by the target benefit amount, paid out in a lump sum.survivor annuity. |
Benefits on Death. Death benefits are not payable pursuant to the SERP; however, in the event of death of a Named Executive while employed, a Split Dollar Agreement provides a one-time lump sum benefit of a stated dollar amount calculated as ten times the projected annual SERP benefit at normal retirement. For Messrs. McDonald and Stein, amounts also include the benefits that each would be entitled under their Unit Plans, which would not reduce the benefits payable under their SERPs. Mr. Stein’s Unit Plan provides for $24,996 annually for ten years following death and Mr. McDonald’s Unit Plans collectively provide for $74,988 annually for ten years following death. In the event that Mr. McDonald or Mr. Stein dies after their respective Unit Plan payments have begun, then any remaining payments in the ten-year benefit stream will be made to his beneficiaries. Benefits on Disability. In the event of disability, the amounts for Messrs. Stein, Lawson, McDonald and Ms. Baruffi represent a one-time lump sum payment calculated as the present value of the projected stream of retirement benefit payments that the Named Executive would expect to receive had he or she remained employed until normal retirement age. Benefits on Termination without Cause or Due to CIC. Upon a termination without cause or due to a change-in-control, benefits are payable in a one-time lump sum, except that for Messrs. Lawson and McDonald benefits are payable in a lifetime annuity. Retirement Benefits. Mr. McDonald was eligible to retire as of December 31, 2018 and receive benefits under his SERP payable in a lifetime annuity. | (3) | Represents the amount equal to three times base salary as of the date of death that would be due to each Named Executive’s beneficiaries under a bank owned life insurance policy payable by the insurer. |
| (4) | Represents the fair market value of unvested equity awards (or, for Mr. McDonald in the case of retirement, represents a prorated portion of Performance Shares) based on the closing price of Columbia’s common stock on NASDAQ on December 31, 20152018 of $32.51$36.29 per share. Performance Shares granted in 20152017 and 2018 are shown at stretch performance. |
Other Compensation PlansPlans Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We also maintain an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) that was adopted in 1995, and amended in 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2010. The ESPP was further amended in 2018 to make certain administrative updates. The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of Columbia common stock at 90% of the lower of the market price at either the beginning or the end of each six-month offering period by means of payroll deductions. At December 31, 2015,2018, there were 499,586383,793 shares available for purchase under the ESPP.
Pay Ratio Set forth below is the total annual compensation for 2018 of Mr. Robbins, the median of the total annual compensation of our employees (other than Mr. Robbins) and the ratio of those two values: CEO Total Annual Compensation
as reported in the Summary
Compensation Table (A) | Median Total Annual
Compensation of Our Employees (B) | Ratio of (A) to (B) | | $ | 2,401,986 | | $ | 52,276 | | 46 to 1 |
To identify our median employee, we used our entire employee population as of December 31, 2018. We measured compensation based on total gross pay for 2018 as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for 2018 and annualized the compensation of all permanent employees hired or rehired during 2018. In accordance with SEC rules, after identifying our median employee, we calculated 2018 total annual compensation for both our median employee and Mr. Robbins using the same methodology that we use to determine our Named Executives’ total annual compensation for the Summary Compensation Table. This calculation produced the ratio shown in the table above.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED 2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN The Board has adopted an Amendment to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (“Amended Plan”), subject to shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting. The Amended Plan will be effective on May 22, 2019 if it is approved by our shareholders at the 2019 Annual Meeting (the “Effective Date”).
The only change to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan reflected in the Amended Plan is updating our non-employee director compensation program to (1) remove the $1,000 per-meeting Board meeting attendance fees and adjust the annual cash retainer for each non-employee director to $47,000 (from $35,000) and (2) establish an annual committee retainer of up to $8,000 per committee, which would replace the current practice of paying $1,000 per each committee meeting attended. The Board believes that the changes reflected in the Amended Plan, which were developed in consultation with Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, will simplify administration of the non-employee director compensation program and are consistent with market practices. If the Amended Plan is not approved by our shareholders then the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan will continue in accordance with its terms (prior to the Amendment). The Amended Plan will not increase the number of shares available for issuance under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the Amended 2018 Equity Incentive Plan
Summary of the Amended Plan The following summary of the terms of the Amended Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Amended Plan, which is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
Administration
The Amended Plan will be administered by the Personnel and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”). Among other things, the Committee will determine, in its discretion, the persons who will receive awards under the Amended Plan, the time when awards will be granted, the terms of the awards and the number of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to the awards. Subject to applicable law and rules of a stock exchange or quotation system, the Committee may delegate all or some of its power and authority to administer the Amended Plan to one or more of its members or any other person selected by it, and may revoke any such delegation at any time. The Board may take any action under the Amended Plan that would otherwise be the responsibility of the Committee. All decisions of the Board or Committee relating to the Amended Plan and awards granted thereunder do not need to be uniform and generally will be final and binding on all persons.
Eligibility
All employees and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Amended Plan. As of December 31, 2018, approximately 2,137 employees and 13 non-employee directors would have been eligible to receive awards under the Amended Plan. For purposes of the following summary, an eligible person who has been granted an award under the Amended Plan is referred to as a “Grantee.”
Stock Available for Issuance Through the Amended Plan
Generally. The Amended Plan provides for a number of forms of stock-based compensation, as further described below. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be subject to awards under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, which is not changed by the Amended Plan, is 3,050,000 shares. The number of shares remaining available for grant as of December 31, 2018 is 3,015,957.
Acquired Awards. Shares of the Company’s common stock subject to Awards (as defined below) that are assumed, converted or substituted under the Amended Plan as a result of the Company’s acquisition of another company (including by way of merger, combination or similar transaction) will not count against the number of shares that may be granted under the Amended Plan. Available shares under a stockholder approved plan of an acquired company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect the transaction) may be used for Awards under the Amended Plan and do not reduce the maximum number of shares available for grant under the Amended Plan, subject to applicable stock exchange requirements.
Share Counting. Shares subject to an Award that are not issued because the Award is forfeited or cancelled will be returned and made available for further grant under the Amended Plan; provided that shares will not again be available for further grant in the case of shares that are (i) used to satisfy a withholding obligation of the Grantee, (ii) tendered to the Company to pay the exercise price or consideration required to be paid with respect to an Award or (iii) subject to a stock appreciation right, to the extent the stock appreciation right is exercised.
Non-Employee Director Awards. The only changes reflected in the Amended Plan are updates to our non-employee director compensation program effective after the Annual Meeting. For the 12 month period following the first Board meeting after each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders (each, an “Annual Period”), each non-employee director of the Company will receive for his or her service on the Board: (1) an annual cash retainer of $47,000 and (2) an annual equity retainer of $70,000. Non-employee directors will no longer receive per-meeting attendance fees. Additionally, the Board may establish an annual retainer for each non-employee director chairing or serving on any standing committee of the Board that does not exceed (x) $15,000 for each committee chaired plus (y) $8,000 for each committee on which the non-employee director serves. All retainers will increase by 5% each year beginning with the 2020-2021 Annual Period unless the Board determines to defer and cumulate the increase (or a portion of the increase). The Board may at any time provide a retainer or other fee for service as a non-employee director, including for service as Chair of the Board or for serving on a specific purpose committee.
Description of Awards Under the Amended Plan
The Committee may award to eligible Grantees incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options; restricted shares; restricted stock units; stock appreciation rights; and cash awards, each of which is referred to as an “Award.”
The terms of these Awards as set forth in the Amended Plan are described in greater detail below.
Stock Options. Options granted under the Amended Plan may include options intended to meet the requirements of an “incentive stock option” as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and “non-qualified options;” provided that the maximum number of shares of common stock underlying incentive stock options that may be granted to any one Grantee (other than a non-employee director) in a calendar year is 100,000 shares. The exercise price for each option granted under the Amended Plan is determined by the Committee, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant. “Fair market value” is defined in the Amended Plan to mean the closing sale price of a share of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market. The term of each option will be fixed by the Committee and may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant; provided that vested options will expire on an earlier date if the Grantee’s employment with the Company terminates. During the lifetime of the Grantee, options may only be exercised by the Grantee.
Restricted Stock Awards. A restricted stock Award means a share of common stock issued to an employee or director that is subject to restrictions and conditions determined by the Committee, including, for example, completing a specified number of years of service or attaining specified performance goals. No cash or other consideration need be paid for shares of common stock subject to an Award, other than in the form of services performed under terms and conditions determined by the Committee. Any portion of a restricted stock Award that is not vested because the specified objectives were not attained is forfeited. A Grantee holding a restricted stock Award (both vested and unvested) will have the rights of a shareholder (including voting and liquidation rights) with respect to the shares subject to the Award; provided that all ordinary cash dividends or other ordinary distributions paid during the period of restriction upon any share of restricted stock will be retained by the Company and will be paid to the Grantee (without interest) if and to the extent that the restricted stock vests.
Restricted Stock Unit. A restricted stock unit means the right to receive common stock or a payment in cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such common stock on the date on which the restricted stock unit Award is settled. No cash or other consideration need be paid for shares of common stock subject to an Award, other than in the form of services performed under the terms and conditions determined by the Committee. The holder of a restricted stock unit will have none of the rights of a shareholder until such time as shares, if any, are actually issued. Any portion of an Award that is not vested because the specified objectives were not attained is forfeited. The Amended Plan provides that a restricted stock unit may include a right to a “dividend equivalent,” which is an amount equal to the total dollar value of all dividends that would have been paid on the shares of common stock covered by the Award between the date of grant of the restricted stock units and the date on which the restricted stock units are settled if such shares of common stock had been delivered pursuant to the Award. A restricted stock unit does not include a dividend equivalent unless the applicable Award agreement clearly specifies that it does. Any restricted stock units that are granted with dividend equivalents will accrue dividend equivalents at the time and at the same rate as dividends are paid on shares of Common Stock, which dividend equivalents will be retained by the Company and will be paid to the Grantee (without interest) if and to the extent that the restricted stock units vest. Stock Appreciation Right. A stock appreciation right means the right to receive payment in cash or common stock in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of exercise of the right to receive payments under the stock appreciation right and the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The reference price applicable to a stock appreciation right may never be less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date on which the stock appreciation right is granted, and no stock appreciation right may be exercisable later than 10 years after the grant date. Cash Awards. The Committee will also have the discretion to grant cash Awards (including, without limitation, retainers and meeting-based fees for non-employee directors) under the Amended Plan upon such terms and conditions as it establishes. Each cash Award will have a value as determined by the Committee. The Committee may establish performance goals in its discretion and determine payout in its discretion.
Change in Control
Except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, in the event of a change in control in which the surviving, successor or acquiring corporation in the transaction agrees to replace Awards with rights to its equity that confer substantially the same benefits as those represented by the Awards, as determined by the Committee, Awards under the Amended Plan will be subject to “double-trigger vesting” so that, if a Grantee’s employment is terminated by the Company or any successor entity thereto without cause, or the Grantee resigns his or her employment for good reason, in either case, on or within two years after the change in control, each Award granted to the Grantee prior to such change in control will become fully vested. If the surviving, successor or acquiring corporation in the transaction does not agree to replace Awards with equity awards that confer substantially the same benefits, then all Awards will vest on the closing of the transaction or any earlier date selected by the Committee. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, any outstanding Awards that are subject to performance-vesting conditions will be deemed earned at the greater of the target level and the actual performance level as of the change in control date and will cease to be subject to any further performance conditions but will continue to be subject to time-based vesting following the change in control in accordance with the original performance period.
In the event of a change in control or similar transaction, a Grantee’s Award will be treated in accordance with one or more of the following methods as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion: (i) settle Awards for an amount of cash or securities equal to their value, where in the case of stock options and stock appreciation rights, the value of such Awards will be equal to their in-the-money spread value (if any); (ii) provide for the assumption of or the issuance of substitute Awards that will substantially preserve the otherwise applicable terms of any affected Awards; (iii) modify the terms of the Awards to add events, conditions or circumstances upon which the vesting of the Awards will accelerate; or (iv) provide that for a period of at least 20 days prior to the change in control, any stock options or stock appreciation rights that would not otherwise become exercisable prior to the change in control will be exercisable as to all shares subject thereto (contingent upon and subject to the occurrence of the change in control) and that any stock options or stock appreciation rights not exercised prior to the consummation of the change in control will terminate and be of no further force and effect as of the change in control. In the event of a change in control where all options and stock appreciation rights are settled for an amount (as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee) of cash or securities, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, terminate any option or stock appreciation right for which the exercise price is equal to or exceeds the per share value of the consideration to be paid in the change in control transaction without payment of consideration therefor.
Adjustments for Changes in Capitalization
Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of shares subject to Awards, the number of shares available for grants, the exercise price for shares specified in Awards, the value of shares used to determine amounts required to be paid under restricted stock units (and any associated dividend equivalent) and stock appreciation rights and the individual Grantee limitations set forth in the Amended Plan will be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of the Company’s common stock resulting from a stock split or other subdivision or consolidation of shares, the payment of any extraordinary cash or stock dividend on shares or any other increase or decrease in the number of such shares effected without receipt of consideration by the Company. The Committee will make such adjustments and its determination in that respect will be final, binding and conclusive. The grant of an Award will not affect in any way the right or power of the Company to adjust, reclassify, reorganize or change its capital or business structure.
No Re-pricing or Repurchase of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
The exercise price of outstanding options and stock appreciation rights may not be changed, and the Company may not make an offer to purchase outstanding options or stock appreciation rights for cash, or exchange outstanding options or stock appreciation rights for other securities, at a time when the exercise price of the outstanding options or stock appreciation rights exceeds the fair market value of the common stock covered by the options or stock appreciation rights, except with approval of the Company’s shareholders or as otherwise required or permitted in the Amended Plan (for example, proportionate adjustments in the event of a corporate transaction that impacts the Company’s common stock).
Clawback Policies
Awards under the Amended Plan will be subject to any clawback or recapture policy that the Company may adopt from time to time to the extent provided in such policy and, in accordance with such policy, may be subject to the requirement that the Awards be repaid to the Company after they have been distributed to the Grantee. For a description of our clawback policy, see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis-Clawback Policies for the Recovery of Incentive Compensation.”
Non-Transferability of Awards
No Award granted under the Amended Plan may be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner, other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution if permitted by the Amended Plan.
Term of the Amended Plan; Amendment and Termination
The 2018 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by our shareholders on May 23, 2018 and the Amended Plan will continue to have a term of 10 years following the date of that approval. The Amended Plan may be amended or terminated at any time by the Board subject to any required shareholder approval. If the Amended Plan is terminated, it will remain in effect with respect to any Awards granted under it that are outstanding at the time of its termination. The Board or Committee may amend outstanding Awards under the Amended Plan; provided that any amendment may not, without the Grantee’s consent, materially impair or diminish the Grantee’s rights under the Award.
Federal Income Tax Consequences The following is a brief description of the current U.S. federal income tax treatment generally arising with respect to grants of Awards under the Amended Plan. This summary is not intended to constitute tax advice, is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other things, does not describe state, local or foreign tax consequences. Incentive Stock Options. Holders of incentive stock options incur no federal income tax (other than potential alternative minimum tax) on the grant or exercise of such options. Although there is no limit on the aggregate fair market value of stock that can be subject to an incentive stock option, to the extent the fair market value of stock (measured at the date of grant) with respect to which the option becomes exercisable for the first time during a calendar year exceeds $100,000, then the option will be treated as a nonqualified stock option to the extent of the excess. If stock received upon exercise of an incentive stock option is disposed on or after the later of (i) the second anniversary of the date of grant of the incentive stock option and (ii) the first anniversary of the date of exercise of the incentive stock option (the “statutory holding period”), then the holder incurs tax at capital gain rates, provided the stock is treated in its hands as a capital asset. The Company will generally not be entitled to a deduction for any amount relating to stock issued under an incentive stock option.
If stock received upon exercise of an incentive stock option is disposed before the statutory holding period, then the holder will be subject to tax as follows: (1) on the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise (or the amount realized on the disqualifying disposition, if less) over the exercise price paid, as ordinary income, and (2) on the excess, if any, of the amount realized on the disqualifying disposition over the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, as capital gain. If the amount realized from a disqualifying disposition is less than the exercise price paid (i.e., the holder’s basis) and the loss sustained upon such disposition would otherwise be recognized, the holder will not recognize any ordinary income from the disqualifying disposition and instead will recognize a capital loss. In the event of a disqualifying disposition, the amount recognized by the holder as ordinary income is generally deductible by the Company.
The current position of the Internal Revenue Service is that income tax withholding and FICA and FUTA taxes (“employment taxes”) do not apply upon the exercise of an incentive stock option or upon any subsequent disposition, including a disqualifying disposition, of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of the incentive stock option.
Nonqualified Stock Options. The holder of a nonqualified stock option recognizes income subject to federal income tax on the date of exercise of such option. The holder is taxed on the excess of (i) the fair market value of the stock (measured on the date of exercise) acquired upon exercise of the option over (ii) the option exercise price. The income is taxable at ordinary income rates and subject to employment taxes, and the Company is entitled to a deduction for the amount included by the holder in income.
Restricted Stock Awards. A Grantee of restricted stock will generally not be subject to federal income tax or employment taxes with respect to the stock at the time of grant if the stock is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Instead, the Grantee is subject to federal income tax and employment taxes with respect to such stock in the taxable year in which the stock is transferable or is no longer subject to such substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever is applicable. The amount that the Grantee must include in gross income with respect to the restricted stock is the excess of the fair market value of the stock at the time it is transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever is applicable, over the amount (if any) that was paid for the stock. In lieu of the foregoing, a Grantee of restricted stock can make a special election under Section 83(b) of the Code to include in gross income, for the taxable year in which the stock is granted, the excess of the fair market value of the stock at the time of grant over the amount (if any) paid for the stock. The Company is entitled to a deduction for the amount included by the Grantee in income.
Restricted Stock Units. The grant of a restricted stock unit will result in no income to the Grantee or deduction for the Company until such time as payments are actually made to the Grantee under the restricted stock unit. Upon vesting of the restricted stock unit, the fair market value of the shares covered by the Award on the vesting date will be subject to employment taxes. At the time the Company settles the Award, the Grantee will recognize ordinary income and the Company will be entitled to a deduction measured by the fair market value of the shares plus cash, if any, transferred to the Grantee.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The grant of a stock appreciation right will result in no income to the Grantee or deduction for the Company until such time as payments are actually made to the Grantee under the stock appreciation right. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, an amount equal to the cash and/or the fair market value (measured on the date of exercise) of the shares received will be taxable to the holder as ordinary income, and such amount will be deductible by the Company. This amount of income will be subject to employment taxes.
Cash Awards. At the time the Company makes a payout pursuant to a cash Award the Grantee will recognize ordinary income and the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of such cash payment. This amount of income will be subject to employment taxes.
Additional Medicare Tax. Grantees will also be subject to a 3.8% tax on the lesser of (i) “net investment income” for the relevant taxable year and (ii) the excess of modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a certain threshold (between $125,000 and $250,000, depending on the Grantee’s circumstances). The Grantee’s net investment income generally includes net gains from the disposition of shares.
Section 162(m). Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company may not deduct compensation in any taxable year in excess of $1,000,000 that is paid to any individual who was a “covered employee” (generally, our named executive officers) for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016.
Non-Employee Director Awards. The discussion above regarding the federal income tax implications of Awards generally applies to Awards granted to non-employee directors of the Company, except that non-employee directors are not eligible to receive incentive stock options and any amounts taxable to non-employee directors in respect of Awards are not subject to employment taxes (including the additional 3.8% Medicare tax) but may be subject to certain self-employment taxes.
Awards granted under the Amended Plan will be subject to the Committee’s discretion, and the Committee has not determined future Awards or who might receive them. As a result, the benefits that will be awarded or paid under the Amended Plan are not currently determinable. The Awards granted for the 2018 fiscal year would not have changed if the Amended Plan had been in place instead of the 2018 Plan and are set forth in the following table and, for our Named Executives, in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and the 2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and, for our non-employee directors, in the 2018 Director Compensation Table above. Past Grants under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan
Since the effective date of the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company has not awarded any options, warrants or rights to acquire securities of the Company. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had awarded an aggregate of 34,043 restricted stock and Performance Share awards under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. Vote Required and Board Recommendation The affirmative vote of a majority of those shares present and entitled to vote is required to adopt the 2018 Plan. Brokers do not have discretion to cast a vote for the adoption of the 2018 Plan without your direction. Therefore, if your shares are in street name and you do not instruct your broker how to vote, your shares will not be voted on this proposal.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the Amended 2018 Equity Plan as described above and attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.
PROPROPOSALPOSAL NO. 23 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
At the 20112017 Annual Meeting, shareholders voted on an advisory (non-binding) voteresolution on the frequency of a shareholder vote on named executive officer compensation. As recommended by the Board, the shareholders approved that an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve named executive officer compensation should occur on an annual basis, and that frequency was subsequently approved by the Board. Accordingly, we have included and will include a non-binding advisory vote on named executive compensation in our proxy materials on an annual basis until the next vote on the frequency of such advisory votes, which will occur no later than our 20172023 annual meeting. In accordance with the vote of the shareholders and the Board, we are providing you the opportunity, as a shareholder, to endorse or not endorse our executive pay program through the following non-binding resolution: “RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation of named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis and the tabular disclosures regarding Named Executive compensation (together with the accompanying narrative disclosures) in this proxy statement.” We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Columbia’s compensation program is guided by the philosophy that total executive compensation should vary based on achievement of both individual and corporate goals and objectives, and should be focused on long-term strategies to build shareholder value. We invite you to consider the details of our executive compensation provided under“Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion & Analysis” in this proxy statement. That section provides you with information about the structure of our executive compensation and the objectives that our compensation program is intended to achieve. The compensation of our executives for 20152018 is closely aligned with 20152018 shareholder returns and Company financial performance. Columbia had strong financial results including significant increases in net income and shareholder return. The compensation of our executives increased along with our strong performance and Columbia’s growth. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Personnel and Compensation Committee values the opinions that our shareholders express in their votes, and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
VotVotee Required and Board Recommendation The proposal on the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve executive compensation requires the affirmative voteFOR of a majority of the shares present and voting on this matter.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FORFOR”” approval of the compensation of executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular disclosures regarding named executive compensation (together with the accompanying narrative disclosures) in this proxy statement.
MMANAGEMENTANAGEMENT The following table sets forth information with respect to the executive officers during 20152018 who are not directors or nominees for director of Columbia, including employment history for the last five years. All executive officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board. | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Age | | | Position | | Has Served as an
Executive Officer
of the Company
since | | Kumi Y. Baruffi (1) | | | 45 | | | Executive Vice President/General Counsel | | | 2014 | | David C. Lawson (2) | | | 57 | | | Executive Vice President/Chief Human Resources Officer | | | 2013 | | Andrew L. McDonald (3) | | | 57 | | | Executive Vice President/Chief Credit Officer | | | 2004 | | Hadley S. Robbins (4) | | | 59 | | | Executive Vice President/Chief Operating Officer | | | 2014 | | Clint E. Stein (5) | | | 44 | | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | | Name | | Age | | Position | | Has Served as an
Executive Officer
of the Company
since | | Kumi Y. Baruffi (1) | | 48 | | Executive Vice President/General Counsel | | 2014 | | Lisa K. Dow (2) | | 59 | | Executive Vice President/Chief Risk Officer | | 2018 | | David C. Lawson (3) | | 60 | | Executive Vice President/Chief Human Resources Officer | | 2013 | | Andrew L. McDonald (4) | | 60 | | Executive Vice President/Chief Credit Officer | | 2004 | | Gregory A. Sigrist (5) | | 51 | | Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer | | 2018 | | Clint E. Stein (6) | | 47 | | Executive Vice President/Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer | | 2012 |
| (1) | Ms. Baruffi joined Columbia Bank as an Executive Vice President and its first General Counsel in September 2014. Prior to joining Columbia Bank, Ms. Baruffi was a partner and member of the board of directors of Graham & Dunn, PC, a Seattle-based business law firm based in Seattle.firm. As a member of the firm’s financial institutions team, Ms. Baruffi practiced for 19 years in the areas of bank mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance and regulatory compliance. |
| (2) | Ms. Dow joined Columbia Bank as Senior Vice President and Credit Administrator in April 2013, when Columbia acquired West Coast Bancorp, where Ms. Dow had served as Senior Vice President and Regional Credit Administrator & Credit Services Manager for fourteen years. Ms. Dow was promoted to the new position of Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer in March of 2018 where she manages the bank’s comprehensive risk management process to help position Columbia for future growth. |
| (3) | Mr. Lawson joined Columbia Bank as an Executive Vice President and Director of Human Resources in July 2013. He became the Chief Human Resources Officer in October 2014. Mr. Lawson has over 30 years of human resources experience, and prior to joining Columbia Bank, he spent 11 years with Franciscan Health System. As the human resources department’s senior vice president at Franciscan Health Systems, Mr. Lawson oversaw more than six hospitals and a network of clinics and physicians in Pierce, King and Kitsap Counties with over 11,000 employees. |
(3) | (4) | Mr. McDonald joined Columbia Bank as an Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer in June 2004. Prior to joining Columbia Bank, Mr. McDonald was a Senior Vice President and Team Leader at US Bank. Mr. McDonald’sHis experience in banking spans over 2030 years and includes senior credit officer positions with US Bank and West One Bank, as well as managing US Bank’s Media & Telecommunications group and South Puget Sound Commercial Banking group. Mr. McDonald previously held lending positions with Mellon Bank and Security Pacific. |
(4) | (5) | Mr. Robbins was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Columbia Bank in March 2014. HeSigrist joined Columbia Bank as Senior Vice President and Oregon Group Manager in April 2013, when Columbia acquired West Coast Bancorp, where Mr. Robbins had served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer since 2007. Mr. Robbins has over 26 years of industry experience and has held executive positions with Wells Fargo Bank and community banks in the Pacific Northwest. |
(5) | Mr. Stein was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofin June 2018. Prior to joining Columbia, and Columbia Bank in August 2012. In May 2012, he was appointed aswith Morgan Stanley Bank for twelve years holding the acting Chief Financial Officer following the retirementposition of the former Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Sigrist served five years with Citigroup where he was a senior member of the global M&A team. Mr. Sigrist started his career in Chicago with Ernst & Young and McGladrey & Pullen in senior auditing roles of financial services clients including regional and community banks before transitioning into the banking industry in 2001. |
| (6) | Mr. Stein joined Columbia in December 2005, when he assumed the role of Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. In May 2012, he was appointed as the acting Chief Financial Officer, and in August 2012, he was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Columbia and Columbia Bank. On July 10, 2017, Mr. Stein was appointed as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, filling the role vacated by Mr. Robbins. He continued as the Chief Financial Officer until the position was filled in May 2018. He is a Certified Public Accountant and has over 20 years of banking, finance and accounting experienceexperience. |
ININDEPENDENTDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Fees PaFees Paidid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The following table sets forth the aggregate fees charged to Columbia by Deloitte, for audit services rendered in connection with the audited consolidated financial statements and reports for the 20152018 and 20142017 fiscal years and for other services rendered during the 20152018 and 20142017 fiscal years. | Fee Category | | Fiscal 2015 | | | % of Total | | Fiscal 2014 | | | % of Total | | | Fiscal 2018 | | | % of Total | | | Fiscal 2017 | | | % of Total | | | Audit Fees | | $ | 1,184,590 | | | | 92.5 | % | | $ | 1,526,223 | | | | 94.6 | % | | $ | 1,345,761 | | | | 93.4 | % | | $ | 1,717,460 | | | | 95.8 | % | | Audit-Related Fees | | | 0 | | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | | | | 0 | % | | Tax Fees | | | 92,000 | | | | 7.2 | % | | | 82,382 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 91,262 | | | | 6.3 | % | | | 71,854 | | | | 4.2 | % | | All Other Fees | | | 4,161 | | | | 0.3 | % | | | 4,161 | | | | 0.3 | % | | | 4,173 | | | | 0.3 | % | | | 4,173 | | | | 0.2 | % | | Total Fees | | $ | 1,280,751 | | | | 100 | % | | $ | 1,612,766 | | | | 100 | % | | $ | 1,441,196 | | | | 100 | % | | $ | 1,793,487 | | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Audit Fees. Consists of fees billed to Columbia for professional services rendered by Deloitte in connection with the audit of our financial statements included in Columbia’s Form 10-K, review of financial statements included in Columbia’s Form 10-Q’s, or services to Columbia in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements, including comfort letters and consents. Audit-Related FeesFees.. Consists of acquisition audits and due diligence on mergers and acquisitions. Tax FeesF.ees. Consists of tax compliance, tax advice, and tax consulting services. All Other FeesFees. .Consists of accounting research subscriptions. In considering the nature of the services provided by Deloitte, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with Deloitte and Company management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC to implement Sarbanes-Oxley, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
AudAuditit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors The services performed by Deloitte in 20152018 and 20142017 were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy outlined in the Audit Committee’s adopted Charter. The policy specifies that pre-approval of all permissible auditing and procedures adoptednon-auditing services to be provided by the Company’s independent auditors is the sole responsibility of the Audit Committee. Prior to commencing such services, pre-approval is required by the Audit Committee. This policy is reviewed annually and describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax, and other services (collectively, the “Disclosure Categories”) that Deloitte may perform. The policy requires that prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, a description of the services (the “Service List”) expected to be performed by Deloitte in each of the Disclosure Categories in the following fiscal year be presentedCommittee or as delegated to the Audit Committee for approval. Services providedChair by Deloitte during the following year that are included in the Service List were pre-approved following the policies and procedures of the Audit Committee.
Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services not contemplated on the Service List must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings. However, the authority to grant specific pre-approval between meetings, as necessary, has been delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Chairman must update the Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting of any services that were granted specific pre-approval.
In addition, although not required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Audit Committee generally requests a range of fees associated with each proposed service on the Service List and any services that were not originally included on the Service List. Providing a range of fees for a service incorporates appropriate oversight and control of the independent auditor relationship, while permitting the Company to receive immediate assistance from Deloitte when time is of the essence.
The Audit Committee reviews the status of services and fees incurred year-to-date against the original Service List and the forecast of remaining services and fees for the fiscal year.
AUAUDITDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of the Board makes the following report, which notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of Columbia’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, will not be incorporated by reference into any such filings and will not otherwise be deemed to be proxy soliciting materials or to be filed under such Acts. The Audit Committee consists of the directors listed below. The Board has determined that the membership of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements as defined under the NASDAQ listing standards. The Audit Committee is governed by a charter. A copy of the charter is available on the Company’s website at www.columbiabank.com under “Investor Relations.” The charter was last amended effective July 25, 2018. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal year 2018. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements, expressing an opinion as to their conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and annually auditing the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing Columbia’s financial reporting processes on behalf of the Board. With respect to fiscal year 20152018, the Audit Committee has: | (1) | reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and management represented to the Audit Committee that Columbia’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(1) reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and management represented to the Audit Committee that Columbia’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | (2) | discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; |
(2) discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; | (3) | received from Deloitte the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with Deloitte that firm’s independence; |
(3) received from Deloitte the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with Deloitte that firm’s independence; | (4) | discussed with Columbia’s internal and independent accountants the overall scope and plans for their respective audits; and |
(4) discussed with Columbia’s internal and independent accountants the overall scope and plans for their respective audits; and | (5) | met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, the evaluations of Columbia’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Columbia’s financial reporting. |
(5) met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, the evaluations of Columbia’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Columbia’s financial reporting. The members of the Audit Committee are not full-time employees of the Company and are not performing the functions of auditors or accountants. As such, it is not the duty or responsibility of the Audit Committee or its members to conduct “field work” or other types of auditing or accounting reviews or procedures or to set auditor independence standards. Members of the Audit Committee necessarily rely on the information provided to them by management and the independent accountants. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audits of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting have been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, that the financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or that the Company’s auditors are in fact “independent.” The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the Company’s independent auditor and determines whether to re-engage the current independent auditor. In doing so, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the auditors, the auditors’ capabilities and the auditors’ technical expertise and knowledge of the Company’s operations and industry. Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has retained Deloitte as the Company’s independent auditor for 2019. Deloitte has been the independent auditor for the Company since 1997. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that, due to Deloitte’s knowledge of the Company and its industry, it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to continue retention of Deloitte to serve as the Company’s independent auditor. Although the Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint the independent auditor, the Audit Committee will continue to recommend that the Board ask the shareholders, at the Annual Meeting, to ratify the appointment of the independent auditors. Based on the review and discussions referred to in items (1) through (5) above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in Columbia’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018 for filing with the SEC.
Audit Committee Members David A. Dietzler, Chairman Ford Elsaesser John P. Folsom Thomas M. Hulbert Michelle M. Lantow Randal L. Lund S. Mae Fujita Numata Janine T. Terrano
PRPROPOSALOPOSAL NO. 34 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte currently serves as our independent registered public accounting firm, and that firm conducted the audits of our financial statements since the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997. The Audit Committee anticipates appointinghas appointed Deloitte to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to conduct an audit of the financial statements for fiscal year 2016.2019. Appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required to be submitted to a vote of our shareholders for approval or ratification. However, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board has determined to submit the selection of auditors to our shareholders for an advisory (non-binding)(non- binding) vote. In the event our shareholders do not vote for the appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether to retain Deloitte, and may retain Deloitte or another firm without re-submitting the matter to our shareholders. Even if the appointment is approved, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the Company’s and its shareholders’ best interest. Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. It is also expected that they will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FORFOR”” the appointment of Deloitte to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2019.
SECSECTIONTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers to send reports of their ownership of our stock to the SEC. We believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements that apply to our directors and executive officers were complied with for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2018. In making this disclosure we have relied solely on written representations of our directors and executive officers, and copies of the reports that they have filed with the SEC.
CECERTAINRTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS Transactions between Columbia or its affiliates and related persons (including directors and executive officers of Columbia and Columbia Bank, or their immediate family) must generally be approved by the Audit Committee, in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth in the Related Persons Transactions Policy adopted by the Board. Under the Related Persons Transaction Policy, a transaction between a “related person” will be consummated only if the Audit Committee, or a majority of the disinterested independent members of the Board, approves or ratifies such transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy and if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party. During 2015,2018, certain directors and executive officers of Columbia and Columbia Bank, and their immediate family members, were customers of Columbia Bank, and it is anticipated that such individuals will continue to be customers of Columbia Bank in the future. All transactions between Columbia Bank and its executive officers and directors, and their associates, were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons not related to the Company, and, in the opinion of management, did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. ANNUAANNUALL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND FORM 10-K Columbia’s 20152018 Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152018 (which is not a part of Columbia’s proxy soliciting materials) have been filed with the SEC and are also available on our website. Copies of the 20152018 Annual Report and Form 10-K will be furnished to shareholders upon request to: JoAnne Coy
VP, Corporate CommunicationsInvestor Relations
P. O. Box 2156, MS 83003100 Tacoma, WA 98401-2156 Fax: Email: investorrelations@columbiabank.com
(253) 272-2601305-1921
DeliveryDelivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address In some cases, only one copy of the proxy statement or Notice, as applicable, is being delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. We will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the proxy statement or Notice, as applicable, to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered. To request a separate delivery of these materials now or in the future, a shareholder may submit a written or oral request to the Corporate Secretary at the address and number written above. Additionally, any shareholders who are presently sharing an address and receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement, annual reports or the Notice and who would rather receive a single copy of such materials may instruct us accordingly by directing their request to us in the manner provided above. WE URGE YOU TO VOTE VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE NOTICE OR REQUEST A PROXY CARD AND SIGN AND RETURN IT WHEN RECEIVED AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON. IF YOU DO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY THEN WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY. THE PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE.
AppAppendixendix A Non-GAAP Financial Measures The Company considers its operating noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses and its ratio to average assets to be important measurements as they more closely reflect the ongoing operating leverage of the Company. Additionally, presentation of this measure and ratio allows readers to compare certain aspects of the Company’s noninterest expense to other organizations. Despite the importance of these measures to the Company, there are no standardized definitions for them and, as a result, the Company’s calculations may not be comparable with other organizations. The Company encourages readers to consider its consolidated financial statements in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. The following tables reconcile the Company’s calculation of the operating noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses and its ratio to average assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | Twelve Months Ended December 31, | | | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Noninterest expense (numerator A) | | $ | 266,149 | | | $ | 239,286 | | | | | | | | | | | Adjustments to arrive at noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses: | | | | | | | | | Acquisition-related expenses | | | (10,917 | ) | | | (9,432 | ) | Net benefit of operation of OREO | | | 1,629 | | | | 1,045 | | FDIC clawback liability expense | | | (979 | ) | | | (294 | ) | | | | | | | | | | Noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses (numerator B) | | $ | 255,882 | | | $ | 230,605 | | | | | | | | | | | Average assets (denominator) | | $ | 8,655,243 | | | $ | 7,468,091 | | Noninterest expense to average assets (numerator A / denominator) | | | 3.08 | % | | | 3.20 | % | Noninterest expense before acquisition, OREO and FDIC clawback liability expenses to average assets (numerator B /denominator) | | | 2.96 | % | | | 3.09 | % |
Additionally, for purposes
| | | Twelve Months Ended December 31, | | | | | 2018 | | | 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | Noninterest expense (numerator A) | | $ | 340,490 | | | $ | 291,017 | | | Adjustments to arrive at operating noninterest expense: | | | | | | | | | | Acquisition-related expenses | | | (8,661 | ) | | | (17,196 | ) | | Termination of FDIC loss share agreements charge | | | — | | | | (2,409 | ) | | Net cost of operation of OREO and Other Personal Property Owned (OPPO) | | | (1,218 | ) | | | (466 | ) | | FDIC clawback liability recovery (expense) | | | — | | | | 54 | ) | | Operating noninterest expense (numerator B) | | $ | 330,611 | | | $ | 271,000 | | | Average assets (denominator) | | $ | 12,725,086 | | | $ | 10,134,306 | | | Noninterest expense to average assets (numerator A / denominator) | | | 2.68 | % | | | 2.87 | % | | Operating noninterest expense to average assets (numerator B / denominator) | | | 2.60 | % | | | 2.67 | % |
The Company also considers its core pretax return, its ratio to average assets and average tangible common equity, as well as its ratio of average nonperforming assets to period end total loans + OREO to be important measurements as they more closely reflect the ongoing operating leverage of the annual cash incentive opportunitiesCompany. Additionally, presentation of these measures and ratios allow readers to compare certain aspects of the Company’s pretax return to other organizations. Despite the importance of these measures to the Company, there are no standardized definitions for 2015,them and, as a result, the Company’s calculations may not be comparable with other organizations. The Company encourages readers to consider its consolidated financial statements in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. The following table reconciles the Company’s calculation of the core pretax return on average assets: | | | Twelve Months Ended
December 31, | | | | | 2018 | | | | | | | | Pretax income | | $ | 211,836 | | | Adjustments to arrive at core pretax return: | | | | | | Acquisition-related expenses | | | 8,661 | | | Core pretax return (numerator) | | $ | 220,497 | | | Average assets (denominator) | | $ | 12,725,086 | | | Core pretax return on average assets (numerator / denominator) | | | 1.73 | % |
The following table reconciles the Company’s calculation of the core pretax return on average tangible common equity: | | | Twelve Months Ended
December 31, | | | | | 2018 | | | | | | | | Pretax income | | $ | 211,836 | | | Adjustments to arrive at core pretax return: | | | | | | Amortization of intangibles | | | 12,236 | | | Acquisition-related expenses | | | 8,661 | | | Core pretax return (numerator) | | $ | 232,733 | | | | | | | | | Average shareholder equity | | $ | 1,969,179 | | | Average intangibles | | | (817,685 | ) | | Average tangible common equity (denominator) | | $ | 1,151,494 | | | Tangible core pretax return on average tangible common equity (numerator / denominator) | | | 20.21 | % |
The following table reconciles the Company’s calculation of the ratio of average nonperforming assets to period end total loans, OREO and OPPO: | | | December 31, 2018 | | | September 30, 2018 | | | June 30,
2018 | | | March 31,
2018 | | | Nonperforming assets (numerator) | | $ | 60,891 | | | $ | 67,747 | | | $ | 76,584 | | | $ | 89,971 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Loans | | $ | 8,391,511 | | | $ | 8,514,317 | | | $ | 8,454,107 | | | $ | 8,339,631 | | | OREO and OPPO | | | 6,049 | | | | 7,415 | | | | 7,080 | | | | 11,507 | | | Loans, OREO and OPPO (denominator) | | $ | 8,397,560 | | | $ | 8,521,732 | | | $ | 8,461,187 | | | $ | 8,351,138 | | | Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and OPPO (numerator / denominator) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.91 | % | | | 1.08 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2018 Four
Quarter
Average | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and OPPO – four quarter average | | | 0.88 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Appendix B 2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN OF COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. (as amended though _______________, 2019) The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain the most talented employees and directors available to serve in positions of responsibility with Columbia Banking System, Inc. and its subsidiaries, to provide them with both rewards for exceptional performance and long-term incentives for future so contributions to it and its subsidiaries, and to align their interests with those of its shareholders that they will exert maximum efforts to promote its growth and success for the ultimate benefit of all its shareholders. The Plan replaces the 2014 Stock Option and Equity Compensation Plan, which was approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2014 Annual Stockholder Meeting and effective on April 23, 2014, (the “Prior Plan”), for awards granted on or after the date the Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders (the “Effective Date”). Awards may not be granted under the Prior Plan beginning on the Effective Date, but the Plan will not affect the terms and conditions of any equity award grants under the Prior Plan (or any predecessor plans) granted prior to the Effective Date. Awards granted prior to the Effective Date shall be governed by the terms applicable to such awards and as in effect prior to the Effective Date. The terms of the Plan are not intended to affect the interpretation of the terms of the Prior Plan for Awards granted prior to the Effective Date. In the event that the Plan is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Plan shall be null and void and of no force or effect, but the Prior Plan and the Awards granted thereunder (or under any predecessor plan) on or prior to the Effective Date shall remain in full force and effect. As used herein, the following definitions shall apply: a. “Award” means a grant of an Option, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit (which may or may not include a Dividend Equivalent), Stock Appreciation Right or Cash Award under the Plan. b. “Award Agreement” means a written agreement entered into by and between a Grantee and the Company setting forth terms and conditions relating to an Award granted to such Grantee. The agreement shall take such form, and contain such terms and conditions, as shall be determined from time to time by the Committee in its sole discretion. c. “Cash Award” means an Award granted as described in Section 7 herein. d. “Board” means the board of directors of the Company. e. “Cause” means (i) with respect to a Grantee employed pursuant to a written employment, change in control or similar agreement that includes a definition of “Cause,” “Cause” as defined in that agreement or (ii) with respect to any other Grantee, any of the following: (A) dishonesty in performing one’s duties to the Company or a Subsidiary, (B) willful misconduct, or a willful failure to act, with the intent of injuring, or having the effect of injuring, the reputation, business or business relationships of the Company or a Subsidiary, or any of their officers, directors or employees; (C) conviction of a felony or of any crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or that reflects unfavorably on the Company or a Subsidiary; (D) willful or prolonged absence from work or failure for any reason to perform duties as net income, excluding acquisition-related expenses, dividedan Employee or Director, unless excused by average assets.the Company or a Subsidiary, whichever is the entity for which services are performed; (E) breach of any material terms of an employment or service agreement with the Company or a Subsidiary, including an Award Agreement; or (F) disqualification or bar by any governmental or self-regulatory authority from serving in the capacity required by his or her job description or loss of any governmental or self-regulatory license that is reasonably necessary for such Grantee to perform his or her duties or responsibilities. f. “Change in Control” means the first to occur of the following events: | (i) | | | | | | | | | | 
Columbia Banking System, Inc
c/o Broadridge
PO Box 1342
Brentwood, NY 11717
| | | | VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
UseAny one person, or more than one person acting as a group, acquires (or has acquired during the Internet12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or group) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic deliveryor more than two-thirds (2/3) of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the daytotal gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mailsuch acquisitions or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
| | acquisitions; |
| (ii) | | | | | | TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | | | — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — |
| | | | | THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
| | DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLYOne person, or more than one person acting as a group, acquires ownership of stock of the Company that, together with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than two-thirds (2/3) of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company; provided, however, that the event described in this paragraph (ii) will not be deemed to be a Change in Control by virtue of the ownership, or acquisition, of stock of the Company: (A) by the Company or its Subsidiaries, (B) by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or its Subsidiaries, (C) by any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities or (D) pursuant to a Non-Qualifying Transaction as defined in paragraph (iv) of this definition; |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (iii) | The Boarddate a majority of members of the Company’s Directors recommends you vote FORis replaced during any 12-month period by persons whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the following: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.
| | Electionmembers of Directors
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nominees
| | | | For
| | Against
| | Abstain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1a
| | David A. Dietzler
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | Thethe Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.
| | | | For | | Against | | Abstain | | | | | | 1b
| | Melanie J. Dressel
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | 2.
| | To vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the compensation of Columbia’s executive officers.
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | 1c
| | Craig D. Eerkes
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1d
| | Ford Elsaesser
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | 3.
| | To vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution to appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending 2016.
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | 1e
| | Mark A. Finkelstein
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1f
| | John P. Folsom
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meetingdate of the appointment or election; provided, however, that the appointment or election of any adjournment thereof.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1g
| | Thomas M. Hulbert
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1h
| | Michelle M. Lantow
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1i
| | Mae Fujita Numata
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1j
| | Elizabeth Seaton
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1k
| | William T. Weyerhaeuser
| | | | ¨
| | ¨
| | ¨
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Please sign exactlyindividual initially elected or nominated as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signinga Director as attorney, executor, administrator,a result of an actual or publicly threatened election contest with respect to Directors or as a result of any other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporationactual or partnership, please sign in full corporatepublicly threatened solicitation of proxies by or partnership name,on behalf of any person other than the Board will be deemed to be not endorsed by authorized officer.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
| | Date | | | | | | | | | | Signature (Joint Owners) | | Date | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | ImportantNoticeRegardingthe AvailabilityofProxyMaterialsfor the AnnualMeeting:The Notice & Proxy Statement, AR/10K is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Board; or |
| (iv) | | | | | | | | | | COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
Annual MeetingThe consummation of Shareholders
April 27, 2016 1:00 PM
This proxy is soliciteda merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar corporate transaction of the Company, unless, following such transaction, (A) the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such transaction own directly or indirectly immediately following such transaction more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the entity resulting from such transaction (or the ultimate parent entity that has beneficial ownership of at least 95% of the voting power of such resulting entity) (the “Surviving Entity”) in substantially the same proportion as their voting power immediately prior to the transaction; (B) no person (other than any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the BoardSurviving Entity) is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of Directors
| | | 
| | | | The undersigned shareholder50% or more of COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. (“Columbia”) hereby nominates, constitutes and appoints Melanie J. Dressel and William T. Weyerhaeuser, and each of them (with full power to act alone), the true and lawful attorneys and proxies, each with fulltotal voting power of substitution, for methe outstanding voting securities of the Surviving Entity and in my name, place and stead, to act and to vote(C) at least a majority of the Surviving Entity’s directors were the Company’s Directors at the time the Board approved such transaction (any transaction that satisfies all of the criteria specified in (A), (B) and (C) of this paragraph is a “Non-Qualifying Transaction”). |
g. “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. h. “Common Stock” means the no par value common stock of the Company. i. “Committee” has the meaning given such term in Section 4.a. j. “Company” means Columbia Banking System, Inc., a Washington corporation. k. “Director” means a person elected or appointed as a member of the Board or the board of directors of a Subsidiary. l. “Disability” has the meaning given to such term in Code Section 22(e)(3). m. “Dividend Equivalent” means, with respect to Restricted Stock Units, an amount equal to the total dollar value of all dividends that would have been paid on the shares of Common Stock covered by the Award between the date of grant of the Restricted Stock Units and the date on which the Restricted Stock Units are settled if such shares of Common Stock had been delivered pursuant to such Award. A Restricted Stock Unit does not include a Dividend Equivalent unless the Award Agreement for the Restricted Stock Unit clearly specifies that it does. Further, a Grantee shall have no right to receive payment of a Dividend Equivalent unless and until the Restricted Stock Unit that includes it Vests and is settled as provided herein. n. “Employee” means a person employed by the Company or a Subsidiary. o. “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. p. “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows: | (i) | If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, including without limitation The Nasdaq Stock Market, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid price, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or system for such date (or, if such pricing information is not published for such date, the last date prior to such date for which pricing information is published), as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable; |
| (ii) | If the Common Stock is regularly quoted by recognized securities dealers but selling prices are not reported, its Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for such stock on such date, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable; or |
| (iii) | In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value shall be determined in good faith by the Committee and by taking into account such criteria and information as is required to comply with Code Section 409A to the extent applicable. |
q. “Good Reason” means (i) with respect to a Grantee employed pursuant to a written employment, change in control or similar agreement that includes a definition of “Good Reason,” “Good Reason” as defined in that agreement or (ii) with respect to any other Grantee, the occurrence of any of the following in the absence of the Grantee’s written consent: (A) any material and adverse change in the Grantee’s position or authority with the Company as in effect immediately before a Change in Control, other than an isolated and insubstantial action not taken in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company within 30 days after receipt of notice thereof given by the Grantee; (B) the transfer of the Grantee’s primary work site to a new primary work site that is more than 50 miles from the Grantee’s primary work site in effect immediately before a Change in Control; or (C) a diminution of the Grantee’s base salary in effect immediately before a Change in Control by more than 10%, unless such diminution applies to all similarly situated employees. If the Grantee does not deliver to the Company a written notice of termination within 60 days after the Grantee has knowledge that an event constituting Good Reason has occurred, the event will no longer constitute Good Reason. In addition, the Grantee must give the Company 30 days to cure the event constituting Good Reason. r. “Grantee” means a person who has been granted an Award. s. “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that qualifies as an “incentive stock option,” as that term is defined in Code Section 422. t. “Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option, other than an Incentive Stock Option. u. “Option” means a right granted under the Plan to purchase Common Stock. Options granted under this Plan may be either Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options, and the term means either or both, as the context requires. Each Award Agreement shall state whether an Option subject to the agreement is an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option. v. “Plan” means this 2018 Equity Incentive Plan of Columbia Banking System, Inc., as amended from time to time. w. “Restricted Stock” means a share of Common Stock, issued under the Plan that is subject to such restrictions and conditions as are set forth in the Plan and the related Award Agreement. x. “Restricted Stock Unit” means a right granted under the Plan to receive a payment in cash or Common Stock, or a combination of both, as determined by the Committee, with a value equal to the sum of (i) the Fair Market Value, on the date of that the Restricted Stock Unit is settled, of one share of Common Stock per Restricted Stock Unit, and (ii) the Dividend Equivalent, if the Award Agreement for the Restricted Stock Unit clearly specifies that it includes a Dividend Equivalent. If the Committee determines to settle payment in Common Stock, then it may pay cash in lieu of fractional shares. y. “SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. z. “Shareholder-Employee” means an Employee who owns, at the time an Incentive Stock Option is granted, stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or a Subsidiary. For this purpose, the attribution of stock ownership rules of Code Section 424(d) shall apply. aa. “Stock Appreciation Right” means a right granted under the Plan to receive a payment in cash or Common Stock, or a combination of both, as determined by the Committee, with a value equal to the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value, on the date of exercise of the right, of one share of Common Stock per Stock Appreciation Right, over (ii) the Fair Market Value, on the date of grant of the right, of such share of Common Stock. Such Fair Market Value shall not be increased or otherwise adjusted because of dividends or other distributions paid at any time on or with respect to shares of Common Stock. In addition, the following shall apply to Stock Appreciation Rights: (1) Amounts payable under the Stock Appreciation Right shall not be greater than the excess of the Fair Market Value of Common Stock (disregarding lapse restrictions as defined in Treasury Regulations §1.83-3(i)) on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted over the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock (disregarding lapse restrictions as defined in Treasury Regulations §1.83-3(i)) on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised, with respect to the number of shares fixed on or before the date of grant of the Stock Appreciation Right; (2) the Stock Appreciation Right exercise price shall never be less than the Fair Market Value of the underlying stock (disregarding lapse restrictions as defined in Treasury Regulations § 1.83-3(i)) on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted; (3) the Stock Appreciation Right shall not include any feature for the deferral of compensation other than the deferral of recognition of income until the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right, and (4) no Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable later than the 10th anniversary date of its grant. bb. “Subsidiary” means, (i) in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, a corporation having a relationship with the Company described in Code Section 424(f), and (ii) in the case of any other type of Award, a corporation with which the Company is considered a single employer under Code Section 414(b). cc. “Vest” means satisfaction in full of all conditions precedent, imposed by the Plan and the related Award Agreement, to a Grantee’s right to exercise an Option, to hold Restricted Stock free of any obligation to forfeit or retransfer the same to the Company or to receive payments under a Restricted Stock Unit, Stock Appreciation Right or Cash Award. | 3. | Stock Subject to Plan and Maximum Awards |
a. General. Subject to the adjustments provided in Section 17, the number of shares of Common Stock that may be made subject to Awards of all types shall be Three Million, Fifty Thousand (3,050,000). The Company shall reserve such shares, to the extent that it deems appropriate from authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock and from shares of Common Stock that have been reacquired by it. Shares of Common Stock subject to Awards that are assumed, converted or substituted under the Plan as a result of the Company’s acquisition of another company (including by way of merger, combination or similar transaction) will not count against the number of shares that may be granted under the Plan. Available shares under a stockholder approved plan of an acquired company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect the transaction) may be used for Awards under the Plan and do not reduce the maximum number of shares available for grant under the Plan, subject to applicable stock exchange requirements. b. Share Counting. Shares of Common Stock that are made subject to an Award of Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units (together with any Dividend Equivalent) or Stock Appreciation Rights that will or may be settled in stock shall be counted against the number of shares set forth in Section 3.a, unless and until the Grantee forfeits rights in the Award by failing to satisfy any condition to Vesting; and shares of Common Stock that are made subject to an Award of Restricted Stock Units (together with any Dividend Equivalent) shall not count against such number if, in either case, they are settled in cash. Any shares of Common Stock made subject to an Award shall again become available to be made subject to a new Award if the shares are not issued because the Award is forfeited or cancelled, but shares of Common Stock shall not again become available under Section 3.a to be made subject to an Award in the case of shares that are (i) used to satisfy a withholding obligation of the Grantee, (ii) tendered to the Company to pay the exercise price or consideration required to be paid with respect to an Award, and (iii) subject to a Stock Appreciation Right, to the extent the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised. c. Maximum Awards. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock subject to Incentive Stock Options granted to any one Grantee (other than a non-employee Director) in a calendar year is 100,000. d. Non-Employee Director Awards. | (1) | For the 12-month period following the first Board meeting after each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders (beginning after the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders) (each such 12-month period, the “Annual Period”), each non-employee Director shall receive for service on the Board (A) an annual cash retainer of $47,000 and (B) an annual equity retainer of $70,000, in each case increased by 5% per year beginning with the 2020-2021 Annual Period unless the Board determines in its discretion to defer and cumulate any increase (or portion). |
| (2) | For each Annual Period, the Board may establish a retainer for each non-employee Director chairing or serving on any standing committee of the Board as determined in my namethe discretion of the Board and not exceeding (A) $15,000 for each committee chaired plus (B) $8,000 for each committee on which the non-employee Director serves, in each case increased by 5% per year beginning with the 2020-2021 Annual Period unless the Board determines in its discretion to defer and cumulate any increase (or portion). |
| (3) | The Board may at any time provide any Director with a retainer or other fee for service in addition to that provided for in this Section 3.d., including for service as Chair of the Board, on a specific purpose committee or to any Subsidiary or for any other special service, in each case determined in the discretion of the Board. |
| (4) | Any retainer or fee pursuant to this Section 3.d. may be payable in the form of a Cash Award, Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Unit Award, in such combination and on such terms and conditions as determined in the discretion of the Board. Unless the Board determines otherwise, (A) no fee or retainer shall be prorated for a partial year served except that a non-employee Director who joins the Board after the annual grant of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Unit Award to the Board for that year will receive a prorated Award for such year and any Award of Restricted Stock Units shall accrue Dividend Equivalents, which shall be paid in accordance with Section 6.a. of the Plan. |
| 4. | Administration of the Plan |
a. The Committee. The power and authority to administer the Plan is vested in the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board and, with respect to Awards to non-employee Directors, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board (each such committee as the context requires is the “Committee”), each of which shall be selected by the Board and shall consist of at least two (2) Directors. Persons selected to the Committee shall satisfy applicable independence criteria of the stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock may then be listed or quoted and be a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. If the Committee does not exist or the Board, for any reason determined by it desires to directly administer the Plan, then the Board may take any action under the Plan that would otherwise be the responsibility of the Committee. Once appointed, the Committee shall continue to serve until otherwise directed by the Board. b. Delegation of Responsibilities. Except to the extent prohibited by applicable law or the applicable rules of a stock exchange or quotation system, the Committee may delegate all or some of its power and authority to administer the Plan to one or more of its members, or to any other person or persons selected by it. The Committee may revoke such delegation at any time. c. Powers of the Committee. Subject to the terms and conditions explicitly set forth in the Plan, the Committee shall have the authority and discretion to do the following: | (1) | determine the persons to whom Awards are to be granted, the times of grant, and the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each Award; |
| (2) | subject to the terms of this Plan, determine the exercise price for shares of Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Option; the purchase price, if any, of Restricted Stock; the Fair Market Value of Common Stock used to determine the amount required to be paid under a Restricted Stock Unit (if applicable) or Stock Appreciation Right; and whether a Restricted Stock Unit includes a Dividend Equivalent; |
| (3) | determine all other terms and conditions (which need not be identical between or among Grantees) of each Award; |
| (4) | modify or amend the terms of any Award previously granted, or grant substitute Options, subject to the provisions of Sections 15 and 20; |
| (5) | cancel or suspend Awards, subject to the provisions of Section 20; |
| (6) | interpret the Plan and Awards; |
| (7) | authorize any person or persons to execute and deliver Award Agreements, or to take any other actions deemed by the Committee to be necessary or appropriate, to effectuate the grant of Awards; |
| (8) | waive any conditions to Vesting; and |
| (9) | make all other determinations, and take all other actions that the Committee deems necessary or appropriate, to administer the Plan in accordance with its books on March 7, 2016,terms and conditions. |
All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Committee relating to the Plan and Awards shall be final and binding upon all persons, including all Grantees and any other persons interested in any Awards, unless otherwise expressly determined by a vote of a majority of the entire Board. No member of the Committee or the Board, or any person to whom the Committee delegates its powers, responsibilities or duties in writing (each, a “Covered Person”) shall be liable to any person (including any Grantee) for any action taken or omitted to be taken with respect to the Plan or any Awards. Each Covered Person shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from: | (x) | any loss, cost, liability or expense (including attorneys’ fees) that may be imposed upon or incurred by such Covered Person in connection with or resulting from any action, suit or proceeding to which such Covered Person may be a party or in which such Covered Person may be involved by reason of any action taken or omitted to be taken under the Plan or any Award Agreement, in each case, in good faith; and |
| (y) | any and all amounts paid by such Covered Person, with the Company’s approval, in settlement thereof, or paid by such Covered Person in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding against such Covered Person, provided that the Company will have the right, at its own expense, to assume and defend any such action, suit or proceeding and, once the Company gives notice of its intent to assume the defense, the Company will have sole control over such defense with counsel of the Company’s choice. |
The foregoing right of indemnification will not be available to a Covered Person to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction in a final judgment or other final adjudication, in either case, not subject to further appeal, determines that the acts or omissions of such Covered Person giving rise to the indemnification claim resulted from such Covered Person’s bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct. The foregoing right of indemnification will not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification or coverage to which Covered Persons may be entitled under the Company’s articles of incorporation or bylaws or insurance policies, pursuant to any individual indemnification agreements between such Covered Person and the Company, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any other power that the Company may have to indemnify such persons or hold them harmless. d. Section 16(b) Compliance and Bifurcation of Plan. It is the intention of the Company that the Plan comply in all respects with Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, and the Plan shall be construed in favor of its so complying. If any Plan provision is determined to not comply with such Rule 16b-3, the provision shall be deemed null and void. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions of the Plan, the Board, in its absolute discretion, may bifurcate the Plan so as to restrict, limit or condition the use of any provision of the Plan with respect to Grantees who are officers and directors subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, without so restricting, limiting, or conditioning the use of such provision of the Plan with respect to other Grantees. All Employees and Directors are eligible to be selected to be granted an Award. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions of this Plan, a Director who is not also an Employee may not be selected to be granted an Incentive Stock Option. a. General. Only Employees and Directors selected by the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall be granted Awards. An Award may consist solely of Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units (either including or not including a Dividend Equivalent), Stock Appreciation Rights, Cash Awards or any combination of the foregoing. All Awards are subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. Notwithstanding any actions taken by the Company in connection with the grant of an Award to any person, such person shall have no rights to or under such Award prior to the time he first performs services as an Employee or Director. Any Restricted Stock Units that are granted with Dividend Equivalents shall accrue Dividend Equivalents at the time and at the same rate as dividends are paid on shares of Common Stock, which Dividend Equivalents shall be retained by the Company and shall be paid to the Grantee (without interest) if and to the extent that the Restricted Stock Units vest and shall be forfeited if for any reason the Restricted Stock Units are forfeited. For the avoidance of doubt, no dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall be paid on unvested Awards. b. Award Agreement. Each Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions of the Award. A person who is granted an Award shall have no rights under the Award unless and until such person duly executes and delivers to the Company an Award Agreement. An Award shall expire, and the Company shall have no further obligations with respect thereto, if the person does not so execute and deliver an Award Agreement within any period of time prescribed by the Company. c. Consideration. The Committee shall determine the form and amount, if any, of consideration required to be paid by a Grantee with respect to an Award. Such consideration may take the form of cash, property, shares of Common Stock or services. d. Arrangements to Cancel Restricted Stock. The Company may make such arrangements as it deems necessary or appropriate to hold shares of Restricted Stock in escrow until Grantee satisfies all conditions to Vesting and to automatically cancel such shares if Grantee fails to satisfy such conditions. a. Grant of Cash Awards. Subject to the terms of this Plan, Cash Awards (including, without limitation, retainers and meeting-based fees for Directors) may be granted to Grantees in such amounts, and upon such terms, at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee. b. Value of Cash Awards. Each Cash Award shall have a value as may be determined by the Committee. c. Earning of Cash Awards. Each Cash Award shall be subject to such Vesting conditions (which may include performance goals) as determined by the Committee in its discretion. d. Form and Timing of Cash Awards. Payment of earned Cash Awards shall be as determined by the Committee and as evidenced by the applicable Award Agreement, which shall in any event be no later than as may be required under Section 409A of the Code. a. The Committee may impose any terms and conditions on the Vesting of an Award that it determines to be appropriate, including requiring the Grantee to continue to provide services as an Employee or Director for a specified period of time or to meet performance goals established by the Committee. Such terms and conditions shall be set forth in an Award Agreement. b. Unless otherwise provided in an Award, in the event of the death or Disability of a Grantee who at the time of his death or cessation of service due to Disability was an Employee or Director and who was an Employee or Director at all times since the date of grant of (i) a Restricted Stock Award, or (ii) a Restricted Stock Unit Award, then the target number of shares of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units, as the case may be, shall Vest upon such death or cessation of services due to Disability. | 9. | Exercise and Settlement of Awards |
a. Options. Grantee shall pay the full exercise price for shares of Common Stock purchased under an Option, at the time the Option is exercised, in cash or other consideration of comparable value deemed acceptable by the Committee (including by tendering, by either actual delivery of shares or by attestation, shares of Common Stock acceptable to the Committee and valued at Fair Market Value as of the date of exercise), or in any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may permit a Grantee to elect to pay the exercise price upon the exercise of an Option by irrevocably authorizing a third party to sell shares of Common Stock (or a portion of the shares of Common Stock sufficient to pay the exercise price) acquired upon exercise of the Option and remit to the Company the sale proceeds therefrom sufficient to pay the entire exercise price and any tax withholding resulting from such exercise. b. Restricted Stock. The Company shall take such actions as it determines to be reasonably necessary to release Restricted Stock from forfeiture restrictions as soon as practicable after the Restricted Stock Vests. c. Other Equity-Based Awards. The Company shall settle payment of any amounts due under a Restricted Stock Unit (together with any Dividend Equivalent that it includes) or Stock Appreciation Right upon exercise of such right by the Grantee; provided, however, that notwithstanding any contrary provisions of the Plan, Restricted Stock Units (together with any Dividend Equivalent that it includes) that become Vested shall be settled by payment of amounts owed thereunder on or before the later of (i) the date that is two and one-half (2 1∕2) months after the end of the Grantee’s first taxable year in which such amounts are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, or (ii) the date that is two and one-half (2 1∕2) months after the end of the first taxable year of the person for whom the Grantee performed services in which such amounts are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. d. Cash Awards. Cash Awards shall be paid as described in Section 7 above. | 10. | Terms Applicable to Options |
a. Limit on Value of Options Granted. Subject to Section 3.c. above, any number of Options may be granted from time to time to a person eligible to receive the same hereunder, except that in the case of Incentive Stock Options the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date each Option is granted) of all shares of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options become exercisable for the first time by the Grantee in any one calendar year (under all incentive stock option plans of the Company and all Subsidiaries taken together) shall not exceed $100,000. b. Exercise Price. The exercise price for shares of Common Stock subject to an Option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of grant of the Option; provided, however, that in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee who immediately before the grant of such Incentive Stock Option is a Shareholder-Employee, the Incentive Stock Option exercise price shall be at least 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock as of the date of grant of the Incentive Stock Option. c. Term of Option. No Option granted under the Plan shall in any event be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date such Option is granted; provided, however, that in the case an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee who immediately before such Incentive Stock Option is granted is a Shareholder-Employee, the term of such Incentive Stock Option shall be for not more than five (5) years from the date such Option is granted. Subject to the foregoing and other applicable provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall determine the term of each Option in its sole discretion. d. Exercise During Lifetime of Grantee. During the lifetime of a Grantee, only the Grantee may exercise such Option. | 11. | Termination of Employment or Directorship |
a. Unvested Awards. Subject to the provisions of Section 8 above, a Grantee shall forfeit all rights in, to and under all Awards that have not Vested prior to the time the Grantee first ceases to be an Employee or Director. Such forfeiture shall occur without the need for further action by any person. b. Vested Restricted Stock Units and Cash Awards. All Restricted Stock Units and Cash Awards that are Vested at the time a Grantee first ceases to be an Employee or Director shall be settled promptly following such event. c. Vested Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are Vested at the time a Grantee first ceases to be an Employee or Director shall terminate on, if not exercised before, the earlier of (i) the same day of the third month after the date of termination of his status as an Employee or Director, or (ii) the expiration date of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right provided in the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence: | i. | Upon the death of a Grantee who at the Annual Meetingtime of Shareholdershis death is an Employee or Director, and who has been an Employee or Director at all times since the date of grant of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right, all of such Grantee’s Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are Vested at the time of his death shall terminate, and may no longer be exercised, on the earlier of (a) one year after such date of death or at such later date as the Committee may set, in is sole discretion; or (b) the expiration date of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right provided in the Award Agreement, except that if the expiration date should occur during the 90-day period immediately following the Grantee’s death, then the Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall terminate, and may no longer be exercised, at the end of such 90-day period. The Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable at any time prior to such termination by the Grantee’s estate, or by any person or persons who acquire the right to exercise the Option or Stock Appreciation Right by bequest, inheritance or otherwise by reason of the death of the Grantee; |
| ii. | If a Grantee ceases to be held at the Greater Tacoma Convention and Trade Center, 1500 Broadway, Tacoma, Washington, 98402, on April 27, 2016, at 1:00 PM, andan Employee or Director at any adjournment thereof, withtime during the term of his or her Option or Stock Appreciation Right by reason of a Disability and the Grantee has been an Employee or Director at all times since the powersdate of grant of the undersigned would possess if personally present, as shownOption or Stock Appreciation Right, an Option or Stock Appreciation Right that is Vested at such time shall terminate, and may no longer be exercised, on the reverse side.earlier of (i) one year after the date the Grantee ceases to be an Employee or Director, or (ii) the expiration date of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right provided in his or her Award Agreement; |
| iii. | If a Grantee ceases to be an Employee or Director for Cause, then all Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are Vested at such time shall terminate, and may no longer be exercised, immediately upon his or her ceasing to be an Employee or Director; and |
| iv. | Nonqualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted to a person who is a Director but who ceases thereafter to be a Director (other than due to death or Disability or Cause) shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine, but in no event more than six (6) months after the person ceases to be a Director, and shall otherwise be exercisable on such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine. |
d. Permitted Absences From Work. A person shall not be treated as ceasing to be an Employee or Director if the interruption of his or her services as such is caused by military leave, sick leave or any other bona fide leave of absence approved by the Company or a Subsidiary, whichever is the entity for which the person primarily performs services; provided, however, that in the case of Incentive Stock Options, the foregoing is subject to any restrictions of laws or regulations applicable to such Options. | 12. | Compliance with Applicable Law and Clawback Policies |
a. Shares of Common Stock shall not be issued pursuant to the Plan or any Award granted hereunder, unless the issuance and delivery of the shares will not violate, and can otherwise be done in a manner that complies with, the provisions of applicable law (including, without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act), and the rules regulations of any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock may then be listed or quoted. Issuance of shares of Common Stock is further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Company will not be required to make any payment or grant any Award under the Plan or any Award Agreement that would otherwise be a prohibited golden parachute payment within the meaning of Section 18(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. b. If the Committee at any time determines that any consent is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the granting of any Award, the delivery of shares of Common Stock or the delivery of any cash, securities or other property under the Plan, or the taking of any other action thereunder (each such action a “Plan Action”), then, subject to Section 22 such Plan Action will not be taken, in whole or in part, unless and until such consent will have been effected or obtained to the full satisfaction of the Committee. The Committee may direct that any certificate evidencing shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to the Plan will bear a legend setting forth such restrictions on transferability as the Committee may determine to be necessary or desirable, and may advise the transfer agent to place a stop transfer order against any legended shares. The term “consent” for this purpose shall include (i) any listings, registrations, qualifications, consents or approvals upon or by any securities exchange or governmental agency or regulatory body, (ii) other consents or authorizations required to comply with applicable law or (iii) any consents by the Grantee to any restrictions on the shares of Common Stock or other property delivered under the Plan. Nothing herein will require the Company to list, register or qualify the Shares on any securities exchange. c. Awards under the Plan will be subject to any clawback or recapture policy that the Company may adopt from time to time to the extent provided in such policy and, in accordance with such policy, may be subject to the requirement that the Awards be repaid to the Company after they have been distributed to the Grantee. The Company, in its sole discretion, may take any actions that it deems to be necessary or advisable to comply with all tax reporting and withholding requirements applicable to Awards under applicable law, including, but not limited to, withholding or causing to be withheld from any form of compensation or other amount due a Grantee such amounts as the Company determines is required to be withheld. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event will the Company be liable to a Grantee on account of an Award’s failure to (a) qualify for favorable United States or foreign tax treatment or (b) avoid adverse tax treatment under United States or foreign law, including, without limitation, Section 409A. No Award or rights under an Award may be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner, other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution if permitted herein. Shares of Restricted Stock may be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of only after such shares Vest and are released from forfeiture restrictions in accordance with Section 9.b. and only in compliance with the Company’s policies as in effect from time to time. a. Except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control, then all Awards (including Awards subject to performance-vesting conditions) shall immediately Vest as of the date of the closing of such transaction, unless the Committee elects to Vest the Awards as of an earlier date. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, if the surviving, successor or acquiring corporation in the transaction (or its parent) agrees to replace Awards with rights to its equity that confer substantially the same benefits as those represented by the Awards, as determined by the Committee, then the Awards shall not Vest but shall be so replaced. The Committee shall notify each Grantee in writing of any action to Vest or replace Awards hereunder not less than twenty (20) days prior to the expected closing date of the transaction that prompts such action. Unless the Committee determines otherwise or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, if a Grantee’s Employment is terminated by the Company or any successor entity thereto without Cause, or the Grantee resigns his or her Employment for Good Reason, in either case, on or within two (2) years after a Change in Control, (i) each Award granted to such Grantee prior to such Change in Control will become fully vested (including the lapsing of all restrictions and conditions) and, as applicable, exercisable, and (ii) any Shares deliverable pursuant to Restricted Stock Units will be delivered promptly (but no later than 15 days) following such Grantee’s termination of employment. b. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, as of the Change in Control date, any outstanding Awards that are subject to performance-vesting conditions shall be deemed earned at the greater of the target level and the actual performance level as of the date of the Change in Control with respect to all open performance periods and will cease to be subject to any further performance conditions. Such Awards will continue to be subject to time-based vesting following the Change in Control in accordance with the original performance period except as provided in Section 15.a. or as determined by the Committee in accordance with Section 15.c. c. In the event of a Change in Control, a Grantee’s Award will be treated, to the extent determined by the Committee to be permitted under Section 409A, in accordance with one or more of the following methods as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion: (i) settle such Awards for an amount of cash or securities equal to their value, where in the case of stock options and stock appreciation rights, the value of such awards, if any, will be equal to their in-the-money spread value (if any), as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee; (ii) provide for the assumption of or the issuance of substitute awards that will substantially preserve the otherwise applicable terms of any affected Awards previously granted under the Plan, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; (iii) modify the terms of such awards to add events, conditions or circumstances (including termination of Employment within a specified period after a Change in Control) upon which the vesting of such Awards or lapse of restrictions thereon will accelerate; or (iv) provide that for a period of at least 20 days prior to the Change in Control, any stock options or stock appreciation rights that would not otherwise become exercisable prior to the Change in Control will be exercisable as to all Shares subject thereto (but any such exercise will be contingent upon and subject to the occurrence of the Change in Control and if the Change in Control does not take place within a specified period after giving such notice for any reason whatsoever, the exercise will be null and void) and that any stock options or stock appreciation rights not exercised prior to the consummation of the Change in Control will terminate and be of no further force and effect as of the consummation of the Change in Control. In the event that the consideration paid in the Change in Control includes contingent value rights, earnout or indemnity payments or similar payments, then the Committee will determine if Awards settled under clause (i) above are (a) valued at closing taking into account such contingent consideration (with the value determined by the Committee in its sole discretion) or (b) entitled to a share of such contingent consideration. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event of a Change in Control where all Options and Stock Appreciation Rights are settled for an amount (as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee) of cash or securities, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, terminate any Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right for which the exercise price is equal to or exceeds the per share value of the consideration to be paid in the Change in Control transaction without payment of consideration therefor. Similar actions to those specified in this Section 15 may be taken in the event of a merger or other corporate reorganization that does not constitute a Change in Control. | 16. | Rights as a Shareholder |
No person shall have any rights as a shareholder by reason of an Award until and unless the Company actually issues and delivers shares of Common Stock to such person pursuant to the Award. In the case of Restricted Stock, the Grantee thereof shall have all the rights of a shareholder (including voting and liquidation rights) with respect to shares of Restricted Stock that are issued and delivered to the Grantee, until such shares are forfeited or reacquired by the Company in accordance with the terms of the Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all ordinary cash dividends or other ordinary distributions paid upon any share of Restricted Stock during the period of restriction shall be retained by the Company and shall be paid to the Grantee (without interest) if and to the extent that the Award of Restricted Stock vests and shall revert back to the Company if for any reason the share of Restricted Stock upon which such dividends or other distributions were paid reverts back to the Company. Any extraordinary dividends or other extraordinary distributions shall be treated in accordance with Section 17. If any such dividends or distributions are paid in Shares, such Shares shall automatically be subject to the same restrictions and conditions as the shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid. | 17. | Adjustments on Change in Capitalization |
Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to Awards, the number of shares of Common Stock available for grants under additional Awards, the exercise price for shares of Common Stock specified in each outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right, the value of Common Stock used to determine amounts required to be paid under Restricted Stock Units (together with any Dividend Equivalent that it includes) and Stock Appreciation Rights and the individual Grantee limitations set forth in Section 3.c. shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a stock split or other subdivision or consolidation of shares, the payment of any extraordinary cash or stock dividend on the Common Stock or any other increase or decrease in the number of such shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” The Committee shall make such adjustments and its determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive. No Incentive Stock Option shall be adjusted by the Committee pursuant to this Section 17 in a manner that causes the Incentive Stock Option to fail to continue to qualify as an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Code Section 422. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Section 17, no Grantee shall have any rights by reason of any stock split or other subdivision or consolidation of shares, any payment of an extraordinary cash or stock dividend, or any other increase or decrease in the number of such shares of Common Stock. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Section 17, any issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall not affect the number of shares or price of Common Stock subject to any Award, and no adjustments in Awards shall be made by reason thereof. The grant of an Award shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company to adjust, reclassify, reorganize or change its capital or business structure. The Plan became effective on March 28, 2018 and was approved by shareholders on May 23, 2018. The Plan, as amended by the Board on March 27, 2019 shall be effective on shareholder approval. Revisions and amendments to the Plan requiring the approval of shareholders of the Company, as described in Section 20, shall be effective when approved by the shareholders. Subject to Section 20, the Plan shall have a term of 10 years following the date of shareholder approval on May 23, 2018. In the event the Plan terminates or is terminated as provided in this Section 18 or Section 20, it shall remain in effect with respect to any Awards granted under it that are outstanding at the time of such termination. | 19. | No Right to Employment |
Neither the adoption of the Plan nor the granting of an Award shall (i) confer upon any person a right to be employed by or to provide services to the Company or any Subsidiary, or to continue such employment or service; or (ii) interfere in any way with the right of a person, or the right of the Company or a Subsidiary, to terminate such employment relationship or service at any time. | 20. | Amendment or Early Termination of the Plan |
a. Amendment or Early Termination. The Board may terminate the Plan at any time. The Board may amend the Plan from time to time in such respects as the Board deems advisable, except that, without proper approval of the shareholders of the Company, no such revision or amendment shall: | 1. | increase the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan, other than in connection with an adjustment under Section 17; or |
| 2. | otherwise modify the Plan in a manner that would require shareholder approval under any applicable laws or regulations or the rules of any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock may then be listed or quoted. |
Subject to the foregoing, it is specifically intended that the Board or Committee may amend the Plan without shareholder approval to comply with legal, regulatory, and stock exchange or quotation system requirements and to avoid unanticipated consequences deemed by the Committee to be inconsistent with the purposes of the Plan or any Award Agreement. b. Modification and Amendment of Awards. The Board or Committee may modify or amend outstanding Awards granted under the Plan; provided, however that the modification or amendment shall not, without the consent of the Grantee, materially impair or diminish any of the Grantee’s rights or any of the obligations of the Company under such Award. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, no outstanding Award shall be terminated without the consent of the Grantee. Unless the Grantee otherwise agrees, any changes or adjustments made to outstanding Incentive Stock Options granted under this Plan shall be prospective only and shall be made in a manner that will not constitute a “modification,” as defined in Code Section 424(h), and will not cause such Incentive Stock Options to fail to qualify as “incentive stock options” under Code Section 422. c. Re-pricing or Repurchase of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The exercise price of outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may not be changed, and the Company may not make an offer to purchase outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights for cash or exchange outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights for other securities, at a time when the exercise price of the outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights exceeds the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock covered by the Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, except (i) with the approval of shareholders of the Company, or (ii) as otherwise required or permitted in the Plan. | 21. | Nature of Awards; Other Payments or Awards |
All Awards are unfunded and unsecured obligations of the Company. Any bookkeeping entries maintained by the Company with respect to Awards are merely for the convenience of the Company. The Company is not required to segregate any assets that may at any time represent an Award and no Grantee or other person shall have any rights or interests in any particular assets of the Company by reason of an Award. A Grantee is a mere general unsecured creditor of the Company with respect to an Award. Nothing contained in the Plan will be deemed in any way to limit or restrict the Company from making any award or payment to any person under any other plan, arrangement or understanding, whether now existing or hereafter in effect. The provisions of this Plan are intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code, U.S. Treasury regulations issued thereunder, and related U.S. Internal Revenue Service guidance (“Section 409A”). Such provisions will be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with Section 409A so that payments and benefits provided to Employee hereunder will not, to the greatest extent possible, be subject to taxation under such Section 409A. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions hereof, this Plan may be amended if and to the extent the Company determines that such amendment is necessary to comply with Section 409A. Without limiting the generality of this Section 22, with respect to any Award made under the Plan that is intended to be “deferred compensation” subject to Section 409A: a. Any payment due upon a Grantee’s termination of employment will be paid only upon such Grantee’s separation from service from the Company within the meaning of Section 409A; b. Any payment due upon a Change in Control of the Company will be paid only if such Change in Control constitutes a “change in ownership” or “change in effective control” within the meaning of Section 409A, and in the event that such Change in Control does not constitute a “change in the ownership” or “change in the effective control” within the meaning of Section 409A, such Award will vest upon the Change in Control and any payment will be delayed until the first compliant date under Section 409A; c. Any payment to be made with respect to such Award in connection with the Grantee’s separation from service from the Company within the meaning of Section 409A (and any other payment that would be subject to the limitations in Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Code) will be delayed until six months after the Grantee’s separation from service (or earlier death) in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A; d. To the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A, any other securities, other Awards or other property that the Company may deliver in lieu of Shares in respect of an Award will not have the effect of deferring delivery or payment beyond the date on which such delivery or payment would occur with respect to the Shares that would otherwise have been deliverable (unless the Committee elects a later date for this purpose in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A); e. With respect to any required consent described in Section 12(b) or the applicable Award Agreement, if such consent has not been effected or obtained as of the latest date provided by such Award Agreement for payment in respect of such Award and further delay of payment is not permitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A, such Award or portion thereof, as applicable, will be forfeited and terminate notwithstanding any prior earning or vesting; f. If the Award includes a “series of installment payments” (within the meaning of Section 1.409A-2(b)(2)(iii) of the Treasury Regulations), the Grantee’s right to the series of installment payments will be treated as a right to a series of separate payments and not as a right to a single payment; g. If the Award includes Dividend Equivalents, the Grantee’s right to the Dividend Equivalents will be treated separately from the right to other amounts under the Award; and h. For purposes of determining whether the Grantee has experienced a separation from service from the Company within the meaning of Section 409A, “subsidiary” will mean a corporation or other entity in a chain of corporations or other entities in which each corporation or other entity, starting with the Company, has a controlling interest in another corporation or other entity in the chain, ending with such corporation or other entity. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “controlling interest” has the same meaning as provided in Section 1.414(c)-2(b)(2)(i) of the Treasury Regulations, provided that the language “at least 20 percent” is used instead of “at least 80 percent” each place it appears in Section 1.414(c)-2(b)(2)(i) of the Treasury Regulations. | 23. | Non-Uniform Determinations; Waiver of Claims; No Third-Party Beneficiaries |
a. The Committee’s determinations under the Plan and Award Agreements need not be uniform and any such determinations may be made by it selectively among persons who receive, or are eligible to receive, Awards under the Plan (whether or not such persons are similarly situated). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee will be entitled, among other things, to make non-uniform and selective determinations under Award Agreements, and to enter into non-uniform and selective Award Agreements, as to (a) the persons to receive Awards, (b) the terms and provisions of Awards and (c) whether a Grantee’s employment has been terminated for purposes of the Plan. b. Each Grantee of an Award recognizes and agrees that before being selected by the Committee to receive an Award the Grantee has no right to any benefits under the Plan. Accordingly, in consideration of the Grantee’s receipt of any Award hereunder, the Grantee expressly waives any right to contest the amount of any Award, the terms of any Award Agreement, any determination, action or omission hereunder or under any Award Agreement by the Committee, the Company or the Board, or any amendment to the Plan or any Award Agreement (other than an amendment to the Plan or an Award Agreement to which his or her consent is expressly required by the Plan or the express terms of an Award Agreement). Nothing contained in the Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, will create or be construed to create a trust of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Grantee. The Plan is not intended to be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. c. Except as expressly provided in an Award Agreement, neither the Plan nor any Award Agreement will confer on any person other than the Company and the Grantee of any Award any rights or remedies thereunder. The exculpation and indemnification provisions of Section 4.c. will inure to the benefit of a Covered Person’s estate and beneficiaries and legatees. | 24. | Construction of Certain Terms |
The term “Section” or “Sections,” as used herein, shall mean a Section or Sections of this Plan, unless otherwise required by the context. As required by the context (i) the masculine form of words shall include the feminine, and vice-versa, and (ii) the singular form of words shall include the plural form, and vice-versa. This Plan and any agreements or other documents hereunder shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and applicable Federal law. Any reference in this Plan or in any Award Agreement to a provision of law or to a rule or regulation shall be deemed to include any successor law, rule or regulation of similar effect or applicability. * * * * * CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION I certify that the foregoing Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Columbia Banking System, Inc. on March 28, 2018 and duly approved by the shareholders of Columbia Banking System, Inc. on May 23, 2018. | | Cathleen Dent, Assistant Secretary | | |
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT I certify that the foregoing Plan was duly amended by the Board of Directors of Columbia Banking System, Inc. on March 27, 2019 and duly approved by the shareholders of Columbia Banking System, Inc. on [●]. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders for the April 27, 2016 Annual Meeting, and the accompanying documents forwarded therewith, and ratifies all lawful action taken by the above-named attorneys and proxies.
| | |
| | | | THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OR, IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES LISTED AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 and 3.
| | |
| | | Continued and to be signed on reverse side
| | Cathleen Dent, Assistant Secretary |
